October 29, 2020

Volume X, Number 303

Advertisement

October 29, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 28, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 27, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

California Governor Gavin Newsom Suspends Provisions of Public Meeting Laws to Aid Social Distancing Efforts

In the wake of COVID-19 pandemic, on March 12, 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-25-20 (“EO N-25-20”).  Among other things, EO N-25-20 suspends provisions of the Brown Act (Govt. Code §§ 54950 et seq.) and Bagley-Keene Act (Govt. Code §§ 11120 et seq.), which otherwise require special noticing and public access to teleconference locations for public meetings held via teleconference.  EO N-25-20 provides that, during the period in which state or local public officials impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing,[1] including limitations on public events, state and local bodies may conduct entirely teleconferenced public meetings (a) so long as each state or local body complies with noticing requirements of the pertinent state law, and (b) provides at least one publicly accessible location from which members of the public have the right to observe and offer public comment at the public meeting.

To further encourage social distancing, the local or state agency may also permit members of the public to attend the meeting telephonically or otherwise.  EO N-25-20 authorizes the body “to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeking to attend and to address the local legislative body or state body, during the period in which state or local public officials impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing.”

Unfortunately, EO N-25-20 does not clearly state whether the public has the right to attend telephonically or electronically as a condition of holding a public meeting pursuant to the provisions of the Executive Order.

As the understanding of combatting COVID-19 is fluid and ever-evolving worldwide, so do federal, state and local governments’ responses.  Sheppard Mullin will monitor the situation and continue to provide updates as they become available.

FOOTNOTE

[1]  Social distancing measures are taken to restrict when and where people can gather to stop or slow the spread of infectious diseases. Social distancing measures include limiting large groups of people coming together, closing buildings and canceling events.

Copyright © 2020, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.National Law Review, Volume X, Number 76
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Michael B. Wilmar, Real Estate, Attorney, Sheppard Mullin, law firm
Special Counsel

Michael B. Wilmar is special counsel in the Real Estate, Land Use and Natural Resources Practice Group in the firm's San Francisco office.

Mr. Wilmar specializes in all aspects of land use law, including local, state and  federal land use and water quality issues, particularly with respect to waterfront projects.  His environmental and land use expertise includes representation of a wide variety of private and public entities with respect to local, state and federal land use and water quality issues under the McAteer-Petris Act, the California...

415-774-3242
Attorney

John Truxaw is an attorney in the Real Estate, Land Use, and Environmental Practice Group in the firm's San Francisco office. 

415-774-2936
Advertisement
Advertisement