January 28, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 28


January 27, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 26, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 25, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Can U.K. Employers Make COVID-19 Vaccinations Mandatory?

Many employers will be hoping to return to the workplace in 2021 and the newly approved vaccines are likely to play a major role in this push. In the U.K., the National Health Service (NHS) has begun its rollout of the COVID-19 vaccine. The rollout will initially focus on nine high-priority groups (including people aged over 50 and the clinically vulnerable), so the majority of the working population may not receive the vaccine until late summer or early autumn. It is unlikely that the vaccine will be available in the private sector until the NHS has completed a significant part of its rollout, which means employers are unlikely to be able to purchase and administer it to their own workforce for the foreseeable future. As such, employers will have to rely on the NHS rollout. The NHS is offering the vaccine on a voluntary basis and therefore individuals can decide whether or not to have it.

So, can employers mandate that their workforce receive the vaccine? Employers have a legal duty to ensure the health and safety of their workforce as far as reasonably possible, so such a requirement would appear to be an effective means of satisfying this duty. However, whilst there may be certain settings where such a requirement is reasonable — for example, in health care or other high-risk areas — employers should be very cautious about pursuing a policy of mandatory vaccination since this could have a number of legal implications.

Primarily, such a policy could expose an employer to claims, including for discrimination and/or constructive dismissal if an employer were to take detrimental or disciplinary action because an employee refuses to be vaccinated and such refusal is related to a characteristic that is protected under U.K. discrimination law (namely, age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex or sexual orientation). For example, there is a risk of maternity or disability discrimination where employees who are pregnant or suffering from a medical condition that amounts to a disability are not able to have the vaccine and are consequently treated less favourably by their employer than employees who have had the vaccine. Likewise, such a requirement could also amount to age discrimination if younger employees, who are likely to be the last category of people being offered the vaccine as part of the NHS rollout, are treated less favourably than older employees who have had the vaccine.

A policy of mandatory vaccination could also infringe employees’ right to privacy under Article 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998. Technically an employer may be able to justify such a breach, but this is likely to be difficult where less personally invasive measures are available to employers to maintain the health and safety of their workforce, such as social distancing and the wearing of face coverings.

Employers should also consider the data protection implications of mandating vaccinations since holding data on whether an employee has had the vaccine is likely to be considered a special category of data under applicable data protection law (meaning that it needs more protection because it is sensitive). In order to lawfully process such data, there must be a lawful basis for the processing, and additional conditions and supporting documentation must be put in place, including conducting an impact assessment to identify and minimise any risks.

Whilst a policy of mandatory vaccination may present difficulties from a legal perspective, employers may want to put in place nonmandatory guidance about the vaccine to encourage their employees to have it. Additionally, employers should not rely on vaccination to replace other protective measures in the workplace, such as social distancing and the wearing of face coverings, and should continue to assess their workplace risks as the pandemic unfolds.

© 2023 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 20

About this Author

Alex Denny Employment Attorney Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath London, UK

Alex Denny helps companies ranging from startups to Fortune 500 businesses on all aspects of the employment relationship both in the U.K. and internationally. He has particular experience in the areas of business protection and restrictive covenants, employment issues that come up in the context of mergers and acquisitions, large scale restructuring projects across multiple jurisdictions and the management of executive terminations.

Alex’s clients come from the financial services, insurance, publishing, technology and recruitment industries. He also advises senior executives on all...

44 (0) 20 7450 4568
Emma Vennesson Employment Attorney Faegre Drinker

Emma Vennesson counsels clients on national and international employment issues. She also represents them in litigation and in cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Emma has the unique perspective of having been seconded to a global software company to manage its employment-related issues across EMEA and APAC.

Employment Counseling

Emma advises employers on a wide range of matters, including:

  • Fair recruitment procedures 
  • Employment status
  • Contracts of employment and service agreements
  • Employment policies and procedures, including...
+44 (0) 20 7450 4562