August 14, 2020

Volume X, Number 227

August 14, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 13, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 12, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 11, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

CARES Act Authorizes the PTO to Extend Patent and Trademark Deadlines during Coronavirus Emergency

Other Squire Patton Boggs articles on the SPB Coronavirus Hub have highlighted the many remedial provisions of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act of 2020. Intellectual Property owners were not left out. Section 12004 gives the Director of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) the authority to “toll, waive, adjust, or modify” statutory deadlines under the Patent Act and the Trademark Act during the Emergency Period, if the Director determines that the emergency “materially affects” the functioning of the PTO, prejudices the rights of trademark or patent applicants, registrants, owners or others appearing before the PTO, or prevents them from filing a document with the PTO or paying a PTO fee.

The Emergency Period, for this purpose, commenced with the passage of the CARES Act on March 27, 2020, extends for 60 days following the end of the Coronavirus National Emergency declared by the President. The PTO Director must publish a public notice of any determinations under this provision, along with his reasons; if the modifications will be in effect for more than 120 days, the Director must also submit an explanatory statement to Congress.

This is significant to trademark and patent owners because they face certain statutory deadlines when prosecuting trademark and patent applications, or renewing them, or making other filings or payments necessary to protect patent or trademark rights. Understandably, many patent and trademark owners are now grappling with efforts to address health issues, and to save their businesses and staffs, during this unprecedented crisis; they simply may not be able to focus on mandatory trademark or patent deadlines at this time. Without this action by Congress, the PTO would be unable to modify or extend any of these statutory deadlines, regardless of the reasons or hardship that triggered the inability to meet those deadlines.

The PTO acknowledged its inability to address this problem in its PTO’s March 16, 2020 Notice. That Notice waived certain fees for Petitions to Reinstate or Revive applications or registrations where patent or trademark owners and others missed certain renewal or other filing dates as a result of the Coronavirus Emergency (see our prior blog post). The Notice stated that the petition fee waivers were not extensions of the filing deadlines, as the Director lacked the statutory authority to modify or extend those deadlines. So while PTO Director Andrei Iancu ameliorated the situation as best as the PTO could, the Notice reflected the agency’s frustration with the limits on its ability to help patent and trademark owners during this crisis.

The CARES Act resolves that quandary and gives the PTO the needed flexibility to ensure that important trademark and patent rights are not lost due to the Coronavirus Chaos. It is a welcome acknowledgement that Congress also cares about intellectual property and shielding patent and trademark owners from the inadvertent and unintentional losses of their rights during the National Coronavirus Emergency.

© Copyright 2020 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPNational Law Review, Volume X, Number 90


About this Author

Deborah M. Lodge, Squire Patton Boggs, IP Lawyer, Privacy Attorney, Internet law

Deborah Lodge specializes in intellectual property, privacy and Internet law. Among her diverse clients are financial institutions, communications and media companies, retailers, and technology pioneers. With her broad legal experience and practical business perspective, Deborah helps clients achieve their strategic goals while complying with the legal regulations that govern privacy, e-commerce, and advertising.

Deborah advises clients concerning privacy and data security, social media, cybersquatting, telemarketing and consumer protection...

202 457 6030
Christopher W. Adams Intellectual Property & Technology Attorney Squire Patton Boggs Washington DC
Of Counsel

Chris Adams’ combination of more than 10 years of information technology (IT) industry work with more than 12 years of intellectual property (IP) experience provides him with the rare ability to help both emerging growth and global companies negotiate the thicket of legal issues related to IT and computer internet technology (CIT). That is why technology innovators and service providers, software developers, and universities – across a gamut of security and internet areas – seek Chris’ counsel to help them thoroughly exploit their IP assets. He guides clients in creating and protecting patents and other forms of IP through commercialization, licensing and, when needed, enforcement.

Before joining the firm, Chris gained hands-on IT and CIT industry experience at several Northern Virginia federal government IT solutions providers. His experience extends to all phases of the software development lifecycle, as well as other IT and CIT areas, and he holds many industry certifications.

Although Chris has vast experience in the IT and CIT areas, his chemistry background has often come into play in his legal work. As a result, Chris has a substantial amount of IP experience in the life and health sciences.

Christopher is a member of the Advisory Committee of the Squire Patton Boggs Foundation, which promotes the role of public service and pro bono work in the practice of law and the development of public policy.

Related Services 

  • Intellectual Property & Technology
  • Intellectual Property Litigation
  • Patent Challenge Proceedings
  • Life Sciences
  • Patent Counseling
  • USITC Section 337 Investigations
  • Technology Transactions