May 21, 2022

Volume XII, Number 141


May 20, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 19, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 18, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Cat Bond Update: Florida Assignment of Benefits

On April 24, 2019, the Florida Legislature passed a bill (the “Act”)1 to reform the requirements for the assignment of benefits of claims for residential and commercial property insurance.  The Act is expected to become law.  Assignment of benefits in Florida has been a concern for the ILS market as related litigation has become a significant factor in losses and claims development for a number of outstanding catastrophe bonds.


For a number of years, legislators in Florida had attempted to address perceived abuses in the assignment of benefits of property insurance claims.  Attorneys and contractors would find homeowners, identify a basis for a potential claim and offer “free” repairs in exchange for an assignment of these claims. Often an inflated or spurious claim would then be submitted to the insurer. In a legal dispute, under the prior statute, the insurer would be liable to pay attorney’s fees in the event the insurer was found to be liable, whereas the plaintiff could not be liable to pay the insurer’s attorney’s fees. The resulting increase in claims and litigation has led to higher insurance rates in Florida and much greater uncertainty in loss development.

The Act

The Act, which passed the legislature and is expected to be signed by Governor Ron DeSantis, creates new sections 627.7152 and 627.7153, and amends certain existing statues. Notable provisions of the Act include:

  • conditions2 for an effective assignment and other rules for the effectiveness of such assignment and the availability of assignment. Such an agreement must, among other things:

    • be in writing, executed and contain an itemized estimate of services; and

    • provide notice to the insurer upon the earlier of three (3) business days from execution of the assignment or the day of commencement of the related work.

In addition, the Act:

  • provides conditions for the insurer to recover attorney fees,3 including that the insurer inspects the property or authorizes repairs within specified time periods, and limitations on the availability of attorney fees to the assignee, subject to the following;

    • If the difference between the judgment obtained by the assignee and the presuit settlement offer is:

      • less than 25 percent of the disputed amount, the insurer is entitled to an award of reasonable attorney fees;

      • at least 25 percent but less than 50 percent of the disputed amount, no party is entitled to an award of attorney fees;

      • at least 50 percent of the disputed amount, the assignee is entitled to an award of reasonable attorney fees;

  • shifts to the assignee (i)specified duties under relevant policy and (ii) the burden to prove that any failure to carry out such duties has not prejudiced the insurer, including, without limitation, the duty to maintain and provide a record of services performed;

  • allows insurers to offer an insurance policy which prohibits, under certain conditions, the assignment of benefits;4

    • such conditions include making available an alternative policy which permits assignment of benefits at a higher premium rate, and the inclusion of a boldfaced legend specifying the policy is not assignable, where applicable;

    • Section 627.422 is also amended to provide that post-loss benefits will be assignable or not assignable, pursuant to the terms of the policy; and

  • provides for advance notice of a threatened litigation to the insurer and the assignor as a precondition to filing suit, including a detailed invoice or estimate of the disputed services.

The Act, upon being signed by the Governor, will be effective July 1, 2019, and will not apply to ongoing assignment of benefits litigation.  The Act could rationalize loss development for Florida catastrophe bonds as incentives for opportunistic litigation would be reduced while requiring the provision of detailed claims information; consequently, predictability of claims and losses for such bonds could improve.

1   Florida House of Representatives Bill 7065, Senate Bill SB 122 

2   Fla. Stat. §  627.7152 (2)(a)(1)-(7).  All references to the Florida Statues are upon effectiveness of the Act.

3   Fla. Stat. § 627.7152 (10)

4   Fla. Stat. § 627.7153

© Copyright 2022 Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLPNational Law Review, Volume IX, Number 121

About this Author

Matthew Feig Corporate Finance Attorney
Special Counsel

Matthew Feig is a special counsel in the firm’s Capital Markets Group. Matthew concentrates his practice on risk-linked securities and structured and corporate finance, and has particular experience in the areas of catastrophe bonds, cell tower transactions and other asset classes.

Matthew has written several articles on structured finance issues, including “The Credit Crisis and Insurance-Linked Securities: No Catastrophe for Catastrophe Bonds” in The Journal of Structured Finance, and co-authored a chapter of The Handbook of Insurance-Linked Securities. In 2016...

212 504 6776
Robert Cannon, Capital Markets attorney, Cadwalader law firm
Special Counsel

Robert Cannon is a special counsel in the Capital Markets Group in Cadwalader's London office.

He focuses on structured finance and securitisation, and has acted for arrangers, originators and asset managers on transactions involving a variety of structures and asset classes, including CDOs, CLOs, mortgage securitisations and commercial paper conduits.

Prior to joining Cadwalader in 2007, Robert worked in the structured finance practice at Clifford Chance's London office for two and a half years and, prior to that, in the banking and financial services group at Matheson...

+44 (0) 20 7170 8735