November 14, 2019

November 14, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

November 13, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

November 12, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

CF on Cyber: Cybersecurity Due Diligence in M&A Deals Under the CCPA and GDPR [PODCAST]

Sophisticated due diligence in corporate mergers and acquisitions has long included an assessment of the cybersecurity posture and privacy protocols of the target company. But the new California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and the European Union’s General Data Privacy Regulation (GDPR) have raised the stakes for compliance, particularly for target companies that process or collect personal information or otherwise earn a living from consumer data. In this podcast, cybersecurity attorneys Jack Clabby and Joe Swanson and M&A attorney Jackie Swigler offer their top five inquiries for cyber due diligence in this enhanced landscape. The discussion is of use both to those looking to invest in or acquire companies subject to the CCPA or the GDPR and to such companies or owners who are preparing for a sale or strategic partner. After a helpful overview of the applicable regulations and their impact generally, the podcast turns to a discussion of the top five tips beginning at around the 7:00 minute mark.

Transcript:

Jack: So welcome to CF on Cyber, we, we have a topic today that came out of conversations with some of our clients and friends about what impact the new California privacy statute is going to have on investments, private equity and other entities might be making. In businesses that process or collect consumer data and we thought through some of our talking points for that and said, you know what, this would be a good podcast. But Joe Swanson, the usual suspects had to bring in some help with this one so we have Jackie Swigler here, who's an M&A and corporate transactions attorney in our Tampa office. She works with companies that are both up for sale and companies that are making investments or purchases so Jackie, thank you for joining us on the podcast today. And as always, we've got Joe Swanson who's the co-lead of our national cyber-security and data privacy practice and, me, Jack Clabby, A Shareholder here in the Tampa office of Carlton Fields. So let's get in to it today, Joe, we've been on a couple of these phone calls where our friends or our clients are asking us about not just compliance with the new California data protection statute but if they're looking at making an investment or acquiring a company that processes data, how it affects them. What's sort of happening here in this cyber due-diligence space?

Joe: Thanks, Jack. So the cyber due-diligence space has really picked up and it's due in part, I think to some mega breaches that have hit the news over the last couple of years and what's that meant for a couple of M&A deals. Most notably, the Yahoo and Verizon merger that had a significant data breach occur in the midst of it and then it resulted in a significant decrease in the price. And then more recently, the Marriott data breach which as it turns out spanned the period of time during which they were conducting due-diligence for the Starwood acquisition. So that's why there's a lot of attention in this space and it's not just on M&A deals, we have been called quite frequently in recent months to assist our partners for example in negotiating reps and warranties for a commercial lease or other types of transactional documents that, you know, the parties to those deals now want assurances that their cyber house is in order.

Jack: Alright, so one of the lawyers who calls us from time to time to help out is here, Jackie. Jackie, can you tell us a little bit about, let's put aside the GDPR and sort of the special problems from the California Consumer Privacy Act, what is usual in cyber due-diligence?

Jackie: Right. So in cyber due-diligence, you would be looking at, you would want to know what laws and regulations are applicable to the company that you're investigating. If you're buying a company then it would be the target company or if you are putting your company up for sale, ideally you are looking into these kinds of questions before you go through the process of putting up your company for sale. So you would want to know the laws and regulations that are applicable and how the company is doing in terms of complying with those laws and regulations. And in order to do that, you would want to look at, for example, policies that are in place whether they are privacy policies, terms of use for, you know, for online operations or policies just internally for employees to be operating under. A lot of companies have vendor contracts so that they, you know, they outsource to third parties to help them into compliance. So you would want to know what vendor contracts they have and if they're complying with their vendor contracts and how they're using third parties to help them with their compliance. You would want to know if there have been any incidents related to cyber and data security and data protection, you know, large incidents but also, you know, small incidents where they're having troubles with people complying with their policies. Insurance coverage is an important part of this as well, whether the company has proper insurance coverage to, you know, to cover for any sort of these breaches.

Jack: Alright. So, essentially that's what you would usually do.

Jackie: Mm-hmm.

Jack: Joe, could you talk to us about why the GDPR and the CCPA have changed this a bit.

Joe: Sure, Jackie talked about looking at applicable laws and regulations and increasingly for businesses that is the GDPR and will be the CCPA. The GDPR took effect in May of last year; the CCPA was passed last year and will take effect in January of this coming year. And each of them imposes significant obligations on organizations around the world, they have extra-territorial reach and for that reason a number of our clients are interested in how they apply and what their impact might be on these types of deals.

Jack: Alright. So these privacy issues that are raised by the GDPR and the California Consumer Privacy Act, the CCPA, am I getting that right?

Joe: You are.

Jack: Alright. The, you know, they're particularly acute when the company that's being put up for sale or contemplating a merger or investment is a business that earns its revenue from the collection and the processing of personal data, right? So the average retail company has its own risks from consumer lawsuits, for example, but a company that's business is buying, selling, processing or earns revenue from the buying, selling or processing of that data, has special considerations and could essentially be wiped out if the wrong calls are made under compliance with these statutes. I think we've got some, I think we have top five hits that we want to talk about today. So let's get through these top five suggested inquiries from parties to transactions or M&A deals that might involve these kinds of company. Joe, could you walk us through what the first of these inquiries.

Joe: Sure, the first inquiry would be just basically where does the data come from? And by that I mean, how much of a target company's business model relies on data that is collected from public sources versus data that is purchased from other data aggregators versus data that's collected from the consumers directly.

Jackie: And where the data comes from matters. That's one of the key establishing questions in your due-diligence investigation. As a deal lawyer on either side of the transaction, knowing the answer to these questions helps me locate the right vendor contracts that I mentioned earlier, to see how the rest has shifted. It also helps me to understand what's sort of specialized cyber advice I might need and to advise my client whether it should invest in that specialized cyber advice.

Jack: Right, and that's because the GDPR and the CCPA do a lot more than state data breach notification.

Joe: They do. They govern how organizations collect, store and use data and what those organizations promise and disclose to the individuals. These would be their use data and their rights and that's what has made it such a paradigm shift.

Jack: So that's why you want to start these, sort of specialized inquiries with where is this data coming from? It might be treated differently, or the incident might be treated differently under the regulations depending on what originates that data. And it also flows through to the questions that are followed. The second inquiry is how is that data used for each individual? And critical here is this idea of profiles. Does the company set up profiles for individual people, right? To track that person across time, across their spending habits or across other behavior and then does the company segregate the data within that individual profile by where it came from? The answers to these questions, I think, can help the potential investor in the target company know, again, where the cascading risk arises.

Joe: Yeah, profiles are really a double-edged sword on the one hand. You know, the downside of them is that if a company keeps profiles, that may trigger a number of reporting and compliance obligations if GDPR and CCPA come into play. On the other hand, the good news is that if the company is keeping profiles it's more likely to be able to comply with customer request to surrender, delete or transfer data all of which at a high level are the rights that are conferred by the GDPR, the CCPA and surely in what will be other statutes like them and active in the coming months. So the bottom line is, if all of this information is one place and the company has a good handle on that, they have a higher regulatory risk profile but their ability to comply is going to be that much greater.

Jack: And there's a big difference between companies that, you know, track consumer data in individual files in individual folders essentially for those consumers. And those that simply are aggregators that sort of separate that consumer data from identifying whose it is. So our first inquiry then is where does the data come from, our second is how is the data used for each individual and our third inquiry is, you know, what is in the privacy policies that the target entity has in place? And are the things that the entity says it's doing in the privacy policy, in fact, being done? Alright, so if a company is collecting data from the individuals directly, what does it tell those individuals and how does it inform them of what it's collecting, why it's collecting it and what their rights are with respect to that data. And can the potential investor, right, maybe the private equity firm or the larger company, can they get copies of those privacy policies? Are they readily available? And critical to this right is getting the privacy policies that actually exist at the point of collection.

Jackie: Like any due-diligence, the target company's willingness to share the information tells us as much, if not more, than the actual information itself. Willingness or ability. This is why when we're helping companies to sell themselves, ideally we would spend a little bit of time helping them to clean up their contracts in their books and records, will often suggest changes to the privacy policies and their procedures if data collection and processing is integral to the company value.

Joe: And I would add one other thing to this discussion and that is that if collection of the data is done through a proxy-vendor or some third party, you know, it's important to consider what review does the target company do for those point of collection disclosures and does the vendor, the third party, comply with those disclosures strictly because liability here for the target company is not just what it promises to do about its consumers or its employees and information it collects about those individuals but also what these third parties are promising on their behalf with regard to collection, storage and processing of data that could ultimately cause problems for the target company.

Jack: But in a lot of what the work the companies are doing now in the run-up to the California statute is cleaning up their privacy policies, right, for exactly this purpose. And Jackie, you were saying, if a company is getting ready for a sale, it's a pretty easy thing for a company to do to rewrite the policy, the hard part is determining whether the company is actually doing things it's promising in the policy.

Jackie: Mm-hmm.

Jack: And inquiry four is based around the new requirements of the statute we see in California that may be adopted. And that's essentially; it may be adopted in other states. Inquiry four is can an individual actually see his or her data and can they delete it, right? So if a particular individual has requested to the company I want to see all my personal data that you have on me and if I don't like what you have, I want you to destroy it. Can the company comply with this? And if so, how quickly and how completely can they comply? This at the heart of sort of the GDPR's right to be forgotten which we've talked about on other podcasts and also part of what's essential to the CCPA's structure, right? Can the company destroy all data on an individual on demand and if not, why not? That's the question that I want to know if I was planning on making an investment and if they can't do it, that's not fatal, right? While we're in this sort of run-up period, but how soon can the company gets its compliance structures in place and what resources would it need from me and my investment firm, right, in order to get there?

Jackie: Right and that will certainly be one of the stumbling blocks to compliance with the GDPR and the CCPA as how can the target company comply with a consumer's request to see, delete and transfer all of the data on that individual.

Joe: So that brings us to the fifth of the inquiries that we wanted to cover today and that is what is in the vendor contracts and are they being followed? Will the target company allow you to review all contracts or just a few example contracts that it has in place with its third parties from which it receives personal data, for which it holds personal data or to which the company transfers personal data either for processing or storage.

Jack: And Joe, that's particularly true about those profiles that we were talking about a moment ago, right?

Joe: Yeah.

Jack: Is the target company selling its profiles, right? It's making these profiles but does it actually profit from the fact that the data is segregated by individuals, right? If that's the case, then all sorts of risk arises and the due-diligence needs to dig in a little bit more.

Joe: That's right.

Jackie: Right. And what we really want to know when we see these contracts is how they spread the risk of data security and compliance? What are the companies promising to each other as far as legal compliance is concerned? Separately, if the target company has made a number of commitments in these contracts, is it actually following them? Does it have the ability to track what its employees are doing? And are the employees following the commitments that are being made?

Joe: And so, you know, the bottom line here within this inquiry is that it's important to know how many vendors are there, where are they located and do they do business in Europe or in particular United States jurisdictions such as California that would pose a heightened risk because of the CCPA and frankly as 2019 goes on, California is probably not going to be the only statute, or the only state with a law like it and so any target company should have its house in order so to speak with a view to these issues.

Jack: Alright, so in sum, sort of there are these five inquiries that we use in connection with M&A due-diligence as to cybersecurity and privacy that takes into account the GDPR and the new California statute. First, where does the personal data come from? Second, how is that personal data used by the company to support revenue, that is, how does the money get made by the use of this personal data? Three, what are the privacy policies and is the company following them? Four, can an individual see the data that the company has on her and successfully request its deletion? And fifth, and finally, what are in these vendor contracts and are they being followed by the target company and its vendors?

Jackie: And remember, it's a cliché but a hard compliance environment is an opportunity for competitive advantage. For a company that's preparing for sale and particularly one that believes it has significant growth ahead, compliance with these emerging privacy standards will be immediately apparent and it will stand out in the sale process.

Joe: Well thanks for joining us and special thanks to Jack and Jackie. Thanks to everyone for listening and we hope you'll join us again soon.

 

©2011-2019 Carlton Fields, P.A.

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Jack Clabby Attorney Carlton Fields Law Firm Tampa FL
Shareholder

Jack Clabby’s practices focus on corporate governance, fraud, and shareholder litigation, including the defense of securities fraud class actions and derivative lawsuits. A former Assistant U.S. Attorney, he also represents companies and special litigation committees in connection with internal corporate investigations. 

As a former cyber prosecutor, Jack also advises corporate boards and management on legal issues regarding cybersecurity and represents companies in litigation, including class actions, concerning breaches and data loss incidents. Jack serves as a...

813.229.4229
Joseph Swanson Cybersecurity Privacy Attorney
Shareholder

Joe Swanson is a former federal prosecutor who advises clients on a variety of issues related to cybersecurity and privacy. He has investigated and responded to data breaches and similar cyber incidents, and he has defended clients in litigation stemming from those incidents. In addition, Joe advises on best practices for interacting with law enforcement, regulators, and other constituencies in the event of a cyber incident. Joe also assists clients with drafting incident response guides and related cyber policies and procedures, as well as complying with privacy laws and regulations, such as the EU General Data Protection Regulation.

In addition to Joe's privacy and cybersecurity practice, he represents companies and individuals in government and criminal investigations and conducts internal investigations. His experience in this area has encompassed a range of issues, including cybercrime, theft of government property, pharmaceutical marketing, health care, gambling, securities, public company accounting, and compliance with professional standards of conduct. The internal investigations have been prompted by government enforcement proceedings, as well as company-initiated investigations based on suspected wrongdoing by employees, competitors, and other third parties. Joe has experience referring the findings of those investigations to federal prosecutors.

Joe also defends companies, executives, and directors in shareholder litigation and high-stakes commercial litigation in federal and state court.  These matters have included securities claims, trade secret disputes, and claims for breach of fiduciary duty.

Before joining the firm, Joe served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Criminal Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida. This experience provides the foundation for his practice. As an AUSA, Joe investigated and prosecuted a broad range of offenses, including computer/privacy crimes, obstruction of justice, tax fraud, mortgage fraud, and money laundering. He tried seven cases to verdict and handled hundreds of hearings and other proceedings on behalf of the government. He also served as the Computer Hacking and Intellectual Property (CHIP) Coordinator in Tampa, where he advised other prosecutors on investigative techniques involving internet and email providers, computers, websites, and other electronic evidence.

In 2017-18, Joe was appointed by the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida to chair three merit selection panels that recommended appointments for federal magistrate positions. He co-leads the firm’s cybersecurity and privacy practice.

813.229.4335
Jacqueline Swigler Corporate Business Transaction Attorney
Associate

Jacqueline Swigler represents clients in general corporate and business transactions, mergers and acquisitions, public and private offerings of equity and debt, corporate finance, federal and state securities law compliance and general corporate governance matters. Her experience includes work for companies in a wide variety of industries, including technology, renewable energy, financial services, insurance, wine, real estate, and cannabis, as well as representation of individuals and institutions investing in various industries.

Jacqueline regularly advises clients on general...

813.229.4375