August 6, 2020

Volume X, Number 219

August 06, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 05, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 04, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Court Excludes Expert Because He Had No Specific Qualifications as to the Specific Opinion He Intended to Offer

In Crouch v. Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc., 2011 WL 2600450 (S.D. Ala 2011), the court analyzed whether a mechanical engineer with a Masters Degree in structural analysis was qualified to testify whether a fire occurred in-flight or post-crash. The court looked at his specific qualifications as to the specific opinion the expert intended to offer. 

The court noted that neither the expert's resume nor his testimony at the hearing provided any basis for the expert to opine when the fire occurred. The expert was unable to state the cause or origin of the fire but relied upon soot patterns to indicate that the fire occurred post-crash. The court found that the opinion was not supported by any specialized knowledge, training or experience in identifying when the fire occurred.  

© Copyright 2020 Armstrong Teasdale LLP. All rights reserved National Law Review, Volume II, Number 273

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Our fire and electrical liability attorneys are fully immersed in fire and explosion issues. We are experienced in fire and explosion training, are active members of professional and legal organizations devoted to these areas and are respected leaders in the industry. In fact, our attorneys are so well-versed in the industries they serve, they are often called upon to share knowledge and experience as instructors, authors and advisors. Our fire and electrical liability clients include well-known companies in the energy, chemical, gas and petroleum industries; product manufacturers and...

816.221.3420 ext. 5217