August 14, 2022

Volume XII, Number 226


August 12, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 11, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

COVID-19: Camps and Summer Programs in Massachusetts Updated July 1

Updated July 1

With this unprecedented school year winding down across the Commonwealth, there has been uncertainty about organized, out-of-the-home activities for children this summer and how to ensure that kids are safe when taking part in these programs.

As part of Phase 2 of its Reopening Massachusetts plan, Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker and relevant state agencies have issued guidance for a number of summer programs, which we summarize below. Phase 2 officially began on June 8 when Order 37 went into effect. Check out our previous alerts here, and here for reopening plans across New England.


On June 1, 2020 Governor Baker issued Order 35 to clarify preparations for Phase 2 of the Commonwealth’s reopening plan. During Phase 2, organizations that operate outdoor sports facilities (including athletic fields, courts, outdoor pools, and sailing and boating facilities) will be allowed to reopen their premises and facilities for supervised youth sport leagues, summer sports camps, and other athletic activities.

Operators of athletic programs must follow all applicable guidance for summer camps, outlined further below. In addition, the framework provided in the order and EEA guidance also contains the following restrictions:

  • Outdoor facilities: open and available for organized youth (and adult) sports activities.

  • Indoor athletic facilities: open and available exclusively for the use of supervised sports programs, including sports camps, for participants younger than 18.

  • Group size: limited, with programs separating participants into groups of 12 or fewer, including coaches and staff.

  • Inter-team games, scrimmages, and tournaments: not permitted for any organized sports activities.

  • Contact sports: must limit activities exclusively to no-contact drills and practices. This includes basketball, football, baseball, soccer, field and ice hockey, lacrosse, and other sports where ordinary play puts players in direct contact or close proximity.

  • Locker rooms: must remain closed, as well as weight rooms and other indoor common areas.

In addition, personal equipment, including gear worn by players, may not be shared and should be disinfected regularly. Shared food or drink is also not permitted. Phase 3 contemplates adjustments to group sizes and allowing games and tournaments, with some limitations still in place.


Recreational camps and municipal or recreational youth programs not traditionally licensed as camps may open during Phase 2. These programs must engage in preparedness planning prior to opening, and are required to follow certain minimum health and safety requirements, including:

  • Screening all staff and children with a temperature check before entering the space.

  • Requiring parents or providers to wear masks or face coverings during pick-up and drop-off, which should be conducted on a staggered schedule.

  • Encouraging children over two-years-old to wear face coverings (at the discretion of parents or guardians) except when outdoors and maintaining six feet of social distance.

Recreational camps are open in Phase 2 with activity restrictions and limited opening for groups 12 or fewer. Camps may have multiple groups of 12 campers and counselors, provided physical distancing is maintained between and within groups and counselors may not “float” between groups of campers unless necessary to provide supervision for specialized activities such as swimming or archery, or to provide other staff with breaks. Further, enrollment must be based on the number of individuals that may be housed in an emergency; emergency shelter occupancy must have sufficient space to provide 6 ft. of separation between individuals. Additionally, the following guidance is in place:

  • Snacks and meals should be brought from home in pre-packaged, or ready-to-serve individual portions to minimize handling and preparation. When this is not feasible, staff must prepare and serve meals. No family-style food service.

  • Camps may not take campers on field trips or any other offsite travel.

  • Shared items that cannot be cleaned or disinfected must be removed from activity rotation.

  • Camps must ensure that a minimum of two properly trained health care supervisors are present at all times at camp in the event a camper becomes symptomatic while there.

Notably, the requirement of Massachusetts residency for campers and staff was removed on June 8. Additional guidance is available here, with the Department of Early Education and Care’s minimum requirements, applicable to child and youth programs including recreational summer programs and camps available here.

Phase 3 contemplates a relaxation on activities, including the use of shared equipment, as well as an increase in group size and certain off-site travel. Residential camps are also expected to open during Phase 3.

It should be noted that summer camps qualify as “places of care” for purposes of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”), which requires covered employers to provide eligible employees with up to twelve weeks of childcare leave when the employee is unable to work or telework due to a need to care for a child whose place of care is closed due to COVID-19-related reasons. The FFCRA was enacted on April 1. Additional information from the Department of Labor is available here.

We have also written about guidance for overnight camps in Maine, available here.

©2022 Pierce Atwood LLP. All rights reserved.National Law Review, Volume X, Number 167

About this Author

Kathleen Hamann White Collar Attorney Pierce Atwood Washington, DC

Kathleen Hamann is an internationally recognized authority in the field of white collar enforcement and compliance matters. Drawing on her nearly 20 years of service to the federal government, in roles at the US Department of Justice and Department of State, Kathleen helps clients navigate the complexities of U.S. and transnational criminal liability and multijurisdictional government investigations.

Since returning to private practice, Kathleen has represented clients in a number of transnational matters, conducting global risk assessments, designing compliance programs, and...

Melanie Conroy Commercial Litigation Attorney Pierce Atwood Law Firm

Melanie Conroy focuses her practice on class action defense and complex commercial litigation. She has represented clients in connection with internal, government, and regulatory investigations, and has counseled boards of directors, board committees, and senior management on a broad range of matters, including securities, corporate governance, disclosure, and regulatory issues.

Melanie represents businesses and organizations across a wide range of industries, including life sciences, financial services, insurance, private equity, real estate, energy, media, consumer electronics,...

Sarah Remes Employment Lawyer Pierce Atwood Law Firm

Sarah Remes represents clients in complex commercial litigation, including class actions, employment-related disputes, and internal investigations.

Prior to joining Pierce Atwood, Sarah was an associate at a litigation boutique in Boston. During law school, Sarah was a judicial intern for Massachusetts Appeals Court Justice Judd. J. Carhart. She was also the articles editor for the Journal of Business & Intellectual Property Law and a member of the Pro Bono Honor Society. Prior to law school, Sarah worked in risk management and internal audit at a Boston-area bank.