September 26, 2022

Volume XII, Number 269

Advertisement

September 23, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

Deciding Your Entitlement To Public Records May Have Just Gotten Less Expensive

The Ohio General Assembly just created a potentially less expensive option for deciding public records disputes. As opposed to expensive lawsuits, anyone who challenges the denial of their public records request will be able to seek mediation in the Ohio Court of Claims for only $25. The paperwork can be filed at any of Ohio’s 88 county clerk of court offices without the need to hire a lawyer. 

Under SB 321, the majority of mediations will be resolved within 45 days – far more quickly than the current court process. If mediation does not resolve the matter, public records law experts in the court of claims will make a recommendation to the court as to how the dispute should be resolved. 

Ohio’s Open Records Act – a state version of the federal Freedom of Information Act – defines which public records are to be made available to anyone who requests them. Though the general principle has long been in favor of public access to most records, local and state governments also have legitimate claims of confidentiality, and courts are regularly required to decide particular cases. 

In the past, requestors had to file a lawsuit to secure access to records where a local or state government denies a request for production. Such litigation can be expensive, even though successful litigants can recover their attorney fees. 

The Court of Claims mediation option that SB 321 creates is just that – an option. Aggrieved citizens may still go directly to court if they choose. But for citizens who are truly interested in prompt access to public records at a reasonable cost, the bill provides a promising way to accomplish that goal. 

© 2022 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.National Law Review, Volume VI, Number 212
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

William J. Seitz III, Dinsmore, antitrust proceedings lawyer, franchise distribution attorney
Of Counsel

As both a respected state senator and an accomplished litigator, Bill brings unique experience and perspective to clients. He has more than 30 years of experience handling a wide range of matters, ranging from antitrust proceedings to franchise and distribution law. As a long-time leader in supporting criminal and civil justice reform, he is able to draw upon his knowledge to help clients navigate through complex regulations and resolve disputes efficiently. 

He has practiced antitrust law for nearly 40 years and was recognized in 2014 by Best...

(513) 977-8303
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement