May 28, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 148

Advertisement
Advertisement

May 26, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 25, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

Defense Contractors - Check Your Non-Disclosure Agreements for Compliance with DoD Rules

Defense industry contractors commonly use non-disclosure agreements to protect their confidential information against potential misappropriation by departing employees, but they must exercise caution regarding the scope of these agreements.  

On October 28, 2022, the Department of Defense (DoD) announced a final rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to prohibit the award of any DoD contracts to an entity that requires its employees to sign internal confidentiality agreements or statements that would prohibit or otherwise restrict its employees from lawfully reporting waste, fraud, or abuse related to the performance of a DoD contract to a designated investigative or law enforcement representative. The prohibition applies to contracts for commercial products and services, as well as contracts below the simplified acquisition threshold.

Non-disclosure agreements are ubiquitous in the defense industry. Employers sometimes draft these agreements very broadly, believing that it will provide the broadest level of protection for their confidential information. Under regulations such as the new DoD rule, however, employers must be careful that their non-disclosure agreements are not so broad that they might restrict employees from reporting potential violations of law to appropriate law enforcement agencies. Many employers may already be familiar with the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016, which contains safe harbor provisions for whistleblowers. The new DoD rule takes the approach a step further. Not only will an overly broad agreement fail in any objective to deter whistleblowers, the consequence of requiring employees to sign such overly broad agreements could be the loss of a lucrative defense contract.

Now is a good time for defense contractors to review their non-disclosure agreements to ensure that they are not overly broad in their restrictions concerning the reporting of fraud, waste, and abuse.  

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/28/2022-23281/defense-federal-acquisition-regulation-supplement-prohibition-on-award-to-contractors-that-require

Copyright © 2023 Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume XII, Number 305
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Christopher L. Lockwood Huntsville Business Attorney WBD
Partner

Chris Lockwood is a partner in Womble Bond Dickinson's Huntsville office and focuses his practice on government contracts and business litigation. He represents government contractors in litigation matters and provides general counsel in all aspects of procurement law, including bid protests, size issues, contract disputes, and regulatory matters.

Chris frequently handles bid protests before the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) and U.S. Court of Federal Claims, as well as size protests before the Small Business Administration and its...

256-864-5547
Richard J.R. Raleigh Jr. Business Litigator Womble Bond Dickinson
Partner

Rich Raleigh is a Partner at Womble Bond Dickinson. He focuses his practice on litigation with an emphasis on government contracts, employment law, complex business litigation (including trade secret and non-compete litigation), and civil litigation.

Drawing upon his experience in the U.S. Army Judge Advocate General’s (JAG) Corps, Rich has successfully represented clients dealing with issues related to government contracts, non-competition agreements, and trade secrets throughout the Southeast. He regularly handles matters requiring immediate...

256-864-5551