iBracewell’s Ann Navaro, Sara Burgin and Daniel Pope discussed the implications of the US Supreme Court’s recent decision in Sackett v. EPA for the reach of the Clean Water Act at the federal level and in the states. They shared insights on the Court’s interpretation of the phrase “Waters of the United States,” including how agencies may implement the ruling.
(Partial transcript) I'm Ann Navarro in Washington, DC and I'm joined by Sarah Bergen and Daniel Pope in Austin Texas. We are very glad that you could join us this morning to talk about the outcome of the Sackets second trip to the Supreme Court in a Clean Water Act case which brings us to at least by my count the ninth interpretation of the meaning of Waters of the United States the phrase that defines the scope of jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act…..(Listen + Watch for more)
