June 25, 2022

Volume XII, Number 176

Advertisement
Advertisement

June 24, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 23, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) Extends Comment Deadline for Proposed Rule to Cap Carbon Emissions from New Power Plants

On March 6, a notice of extension of public comment period was published in the Federal Register for EPA’s proposed rule to regulate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from new power plants.  The comment deadline for the proposed rule will be extended for 60 days until May 9, 2014. 

As we previously reported, the comment period initially was only 60 days (comments had been due March 10, 2014). On Jan. 15, 2014, EPA received a bi-partisan letter from 71 members of Congress seeking this 60-day extension, given the potential impacts of the proposed rule not only on power plants, but also on energy-intensive manufacturers and homeowners who pay electricity bills. 

In addition to extending the time for comment on the proposed rule, the comment period extension will provide additional time to respond to EPA’s Feb. 26, 2014, notice of data availability in requesting comments on EPA’s arguments about what data the agency is allowed to consider in making its determination that carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) is the “best system of emission reduction” that is “adequately demonstrated,” as required by the Clean Air Act. In making that determination, EPA relied on data from three power plants that received federal assistance. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 limits the use of data from federally- subsidized facilities when setting standards.  EPA is arguing that this limitation only prohibits “sole” reliance on data from subsidized projects.

On Jan. 15, 2014, the State of Nebraska filed suit in the District Court for the District of Columbia seeking withdrawal of the proposed rule on the grounds that it violates the Energy Policy Act, and an injunction against EPA to bar the agency from using data from federally-subsidized projects to identify the “best system of emission reduction” that is “adequately demonstrated.” 

A copy of the notice extending the comment deadline is available here: http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-02/documents/commentexte...

A copy of the notice of data availability is available here: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-02-26/pdf/2014-03115.pdf

© 2022 BARNES & THORNBURG LLPNational Law Review, Volume IV, Number 71
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Joel Bowers Environmental Attorney
Partner

Environmental lawyer Joel Bowers is dedicated to finding creative solutions to even the most difficult enforcement proceedings and complex deals. Joel is experienced in transforming technical analysis into practical legal counsel that takes into account big-picture client objectives.

Joel focuses his practice on environmental compliance and enforcement, including air quality and chemical regulation. He advises on remediation, corrective action and voluntary cleanups, as well as cost recovery defense.

In addition, Joel advises on environmental diligence for commercial and real...

574-237-1287
Charles Denton Environmental Attorney
Partner

Charlie Denton represents an array of clients in environmental and toxic tort litigation, enforcement defense, regulatory compliance solutions and pollution insurance coverage disputes. He also serves as an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) neutral mediator and arbitrator. Persistent and highly collaborative, Charlie can take complicated issues and challenges and then identify a strategic path to achieve the client’s objectives.

Charlie’s representation of industrial, municipal, institutional, educational and individual clients includes judicial and administrative environmental...

616-742-3974
Michael Elam Environmental Energy Attorney
Partner

Veteran attorney Michael Elam brings more than three decades of experience in environmental, energy, infrastructure and natural resource law in both the private and public sectors. He structures creative agreements and helps secure approvals and financing for complex national and international agreements involving the development, remediation and financing of environmentally challenged or controversial projects surrounding energy and sensitive water bodies or sources.

Michael represents businesses and other clients in complex projects and transactions, disputes and litigation. He is...

312-214-5630
Anthony C. Sullivan, Barnes Thornburg Law Firm, Indianapolis, Environmental and Litigation Law Attorney
Partner

Anthony (Tony) C. Sullivan, a partner in Barnes & Thornburg LLP’s Indianapolis office, concentrates on environmental law. His practice focuses primarily on air and water issues, but it also covers virtually all areas of environmental law, including solid waste issues, Superfund matters, underground storage tanks, and asbestos concerns.

Mr. Sullivan’s practice generally involves litigation, counseling, and negotiation. In addition to appearing before federal courts, state courts, and administrative courts on behalf of his clients, he has...

317-231-7472
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement