July 15, 2017

July 14, 2017

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 13, 2017

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

European Commission Publishes CMU Report on National Barriers to Capital Flows

On February 27, the European Commission (EC) published a report (Report) on its capital markets union (CMU) initiative addressing national barriers to capital flows. The Report sets out the initial findings of the EC’s group of representatives of member states on national barriers to cross-border capital flows and the steps that the EC expects member states to take to address them.

The Report includes a section on barriers to the cross-border distribution of investment funds. As an illustration of the barriers, the Report states that a third of funds marketed cross-border are sold in only one other member state and another third in no more than four other member states. The Report goes on to highlight the disparities in national rules concerning the marketing of funds (particularly in relation to pre-marketing and reverse solicitation), administrative arrangements imposed on the Undertakings for the Collective Investment of Transferable Securities (UCITS) and alternative investment funds, and regulatory fees for cross-border marketing.

The EC requests that member states review their national rules on marketing and take further steps to map administrative arrangements, such as requiring that paying agent tasks be performed by a local credit institution or requiring a local distributor to be appointed once a fund is marketed to retail investors, with a view to eliminating unnecessary administrative burdens by 2019.

It also calls on member states to ensure that all fund notification-related fees charged by member states are published in a comprehensive and user-friendly manner on a single national public website. The Report states that the EC is assessing whether notification fees are compatible with an efficient notification procedure, the passporting rights provided for in legislation, and how to ensure that fees are proportionate and not excessive. To the extent fees are allowed, the EC will consider the introduction of a single public domain for fee-related information, in the form of a comparative website or a central repository.

The Report is available here.

©2017 Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP


About this Author

Nathaniel Lalone, Katten Muchin Law Firm, Financial Institutions Attorney
Senior Associate

Nathaniel Lalone, a partner at Katten Muchin Rosenman UK LLP, has a broad range of experience in the regulation of financial products and financial markets, and frequently provides regulatory and compliance advice to trading venues, clearing houses and buy-side firms active in the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives, futures and securities markets. He is actively involved in advising clients on the implementation of MiFID 2 and MiFIR in the European Union as well as the international reach of US financial services regulation. He also has significant experience with structuring...

+44 0 20 7776 7629
Neil V. Carbone, Estate, Trust, Attorney, Katten, Law Firm

Neil V. Carbone concentrates his practice in trust and estates law, with a focus in estate planning, administration and litigation, including issues pertaining to taxation, business organizations, property rights, estate plans, wills, trusts, insurance trusts, living wills, health care proxies and powers of attorney. He has an extensive background in litigation and in Surrogate’s Court matters and procedures.

Prior to entering private practice, Neil was a senior court attorney at the New York Court of Appeals.