September 29, 2020

Volume X, Number 273

September 29, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 28, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Faxing Without Opt-Out Leads to $1.35M Payment to Get Out of TCPA Class Action

Florida-based radiology provider, SRA Ventures, and two units of Canada-based cardiology and imaging service provider, KMH Labs, have agreed to pay Medical & Chiropractic Clinic Inc. $1.35 million to settle a proposed class action lawsuit after the providers faxed nearly 5,600 advertisements that did not contain necessary opt-out language, allegedly in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), as amended by the Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005 (“JFPA”), and FCC regulations.

According to the notice of settlement agreement filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, on May 2, 2017, defendants SRA Ventures, a Florida-based radiology provider doing business as WestCoast Radiology, and two units of KMH Labs, a Canadian cardiology and imaging service provider, will pay the amount into a settlement fund to be distributed to class members who received the faxes, in addition to attorneys’ fees, costs, administering the settlement, and incentive awards.

Under the JFPA, it is unlawful for a person to use a telephone fax machine, computer or another device to send an unsolicited advertisement to a telephone fax machine. Additionally, the JFPA requires that senders of faxed advertisements place a clear and conspicuous notice on the first page of the transmission regarding the ability to opt-out. In this case, the sender did not include the opt-out notice and did not meet any of the exceptions such as a prior business relationship.

The faxes at issue were sent to 1,805 different fax numbers during four days in early February and early March 2016. Settlement class members who submit timely claims will receive proportional shares of the fund, up to $500 per fax received, which is the same amount they would receive as statutory damages.

The use of faxes has decreased in recent years, but litigation regarding junk faxes that violate the TCPA is not likely to go away anytime soon. On the same day Medical & Chiropractic Clinic, Inc. v. KMH Cardiology Centers, Inc. et al. was decided, an Illinois appellate court ruled on a different case regarding a settlement reached regarding alleged junk faxes in CE Design Ltd. v. HealthCraft Inc. et al. Although the court upheld the trial court’s decision not to revive an eight-year legal battle about the indemnification of a Canadian home health-support company regarding the alleged junk faxes, each case underscores the spectrum of complex issues involved in TCPA cases.

© Polsinelli PC, Polsinelli LLP in CaliforniaNational Law Review, Volume VII, Number 131

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Amanda Katzenstein, Polsinelli, Media Technology Lawyer, Trademark Rights Attorney
Associate

Amanda Katzenstein uses her extensive media and technology experience to assist clients with resolving their legal challenges. She started her career in television news, serving as a reporter and producer for CLTV, Chicago’s 24-hour news network; as a reporter, editor, and photographer for both WYCC-TV and the Evanston Community Cable Channel; and working in production for a nationally syndicated TV talk show.

Additionally, Amanda’s experience includes dealing with the practical effects of trademark rights at a national advertising agency,...

202.626.8304
Jean Marie R. Pechette, Polsinelli, Business Strategy Attorney, Life Sciences Industries lawyer
Shareholder

Jean Pechette is a creative yet practical thinker who partners with clients and fully engages in assisting them to achieve their matter-specific goals by first understanding their overall business strategies. Jean has over 20 years of experience in information technology, privacy and intellectual property law, with a focus on health care and life sciences industries, including serving as a division general counsel for a Fortune 50 company.  She brings to clients a unique perspective to help them navigate novel and complex technology-related problems.

312.873.3690
Jarno Varno, Privacy Attorney, Polsinelli Law FIrm
Shareholder

Jarno Vanto's strengths lie in his ability to intimately understand each client’s specific industry technology and his awareness of the complex international environment. His extensive international experience allows him to provide a differentiated perspective to clients on privacy, cyber security, intellectual property, and corporate matters. 

212.413.2841