August 18, 2019

August 16, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 15, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Federal Contractors Face Disqualification From Future Work

Federal contractors, including businesses and universities performing on federally funded projects, have new reporting obligations regarding their labor and safety practices. On May 28, 2015, the Department of Labor published proposed guidance on the implementation of Executive Order 13673, "Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces," aimed at promoting economy and efficiency in federal contracting.

The guidance requires contractors to report violations of federal and state labor laws when bidding on certain government contracts. Government contracting officers will be required to consider a contractor’s history of labor law violations when awarding certain federal contracts. Labor unions and employee organizations stand poised to increase their leverage by filing charges of labor and safety violations to build an unfavorable record for companies refusing to recognize and bargain with employees.

The new guidance contains several compliance requirements that federal contractors must complete prior to the award of certain contracts valued over $500,000. Among other requirements:

  • Contractors and subcontractors must report administrative merits determinations, civil judgments, and arbitral awards or decisions rendered against them within the previous three years for a violation of 14 different federal labor laws "or any equivalent State laws."

  • Contractors must disclose any similar labor law violations by subcontractors that will perform on the contract.

  • Contractors must update their labor law violation reporting semi-annually during the performance of the contract.

Government contracting officers will look unfavorably upon labor law violations that are "serious," "repeated," "willful," or "pervasive," and violations will be "assessed on a case-by-case basis in light of the totality of the circumstances, including the severity of the violation or violations, the size of the contractor, and any mitigating factors."

The Department’s lengthy proposed guidance can be accessed at http://1.usa.gov/1KAXlFV.

© Copyright 2019 Armstrong Teasdale LLP. All rights reserved

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Tod Stephens, Armstrong Teasdale, Security Lawyer, Iraq Vet
Associate

Security and Facility Clearance Law

After leading American and Iraqi soldiers in combat for nearly three years, Tod Stephens has become a leader in the field of security law. In his practice, Tod helps businesses anticipate and resolve defense industry compliance challenges.

Within the cleared defense industry, Tod advises in-house counsel, business managers, corporate directors, and Facility Security Officers (FSOs) in navigating their complex regulatory obligations. Tod regularly represents clients during their...

314.342.8065 Read more: http:/
Brian E. Kaveney, Litigation, Attorney, Armstrong Teasdale, Law firm
Partner & Security Clearance Team Leader

Brian Kaveney is an experienced business litigator whose practice includes advising defense contractors on compliance matters and assisting companies and individuals in obtaining and maintaining the proper security clearance.

The founder and head of Armstrong Teasdale’s Security Clearance and Facility Clearance Task Force, Brian guides companies, key management personnel, and employees through the process of obtaining and keeping the approval that is required to work with the Department of Defense, the military services and other agencies. He anticipates issues and concerns and helps clients adhere to the appropriate guidelines, directives, executive orders, statutes and case law.

800-243-5070