January 17, 2021

Volume XI, Number 17


January 15, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 14, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Federal Court Vacates Nationwide Permit 48 for Local Commercial Shellfish Growers

In yet another setback for the Army Corps of Engineers’ Nationwide Permit program, a June 11, 2020 federal court ruling vacated NWP 48 for commercial shellfish aquaculture in Washington State. Center for Food Safety v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, No. 17-1209. This remedy ruling followed the court’s prior October 2019 decision that the Corps did not adequately consider the impacts of commercial shellfish aquaculture under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the National Environmental Policy Act.

The court’s opinion focused on two main issues: 1) the seriousness of the Corps’ errors in issuing NWP 48, and 2) the potential interim consequences of vacatur. According to the court, the Corps’ actions were serious enough to support vacatur because they resulted in the environmental impacts of commercial shellfish aquaculture, both individually and cumulatively, remaining mostly unknown. The court rejected arguments that individual projects’ “verification process or state, local, and/or Tribal oversight of commercial shellfish aquaculture activities in Washington overcome the seriousness of the agency’s errors[.]” The court also expressed skepticism over the Corps’ ability to reissue any revised NWP 48 that would pass muster for broad-scale coverage. The Court reasoned the breadth and diversity of environments and activities likely preclude a nationwide impact analysis and crafting of an appropriate permit.  Instead, the court pointed industry and the Corps to the time-consuming and expensive Section 404 individual permitting process. 

An equitable assessment of the consequences that could arise from the vacatur of NWP 48 was a closer call for vacatur. The court considered that the Corps may be unable to process individual permits before NWP 48 expired in 2022. The Court also considered arguments raised by tribal and industry parties that vacating NWP 48 would seriously threaten the economic viability of their shellfish operations. The Swinomish Indian Tribal Community argued that the time needed to acquire a new permit in order to commence operations would inhibit their ability to run their company and provide sustenance for its members. Similarly, industry argued that local commercial shellfish farmers would be unable to compete on a national or international basis while waiting to obtain a new permit. Nevertheless, the court concluded that the potential environmental consequences of continuing the status quo under current NWP 48 outweighed business harms.

The court’s ultimate remedy features both tailored and draconian elements. On one hand, the court’s vacatur of NWP 48 is limited to the State of Washington, in contrast to the growing trends of nationwide injunctions by district courts, including for NWP 12. Moreover, the court agreed to stay its vacatur for 60 days to allow time for an appeal. The Court also stayed vacatur as to specific activities, including:

  • maintenance and harvesting activities for shellfish that were already planted/seeded as of June 11, 2020;

  • seeding/planting activities occurring within six months of the date of the Order in areas that do not contain mature native eelgrass beds, as well as to maintenance and subsequent harvesting of beds seeded/planted under this subsection; and

  • shellfish activities in furtherance of certain adjudicated treaty rights.

On the other hand, the court found that the vacatur of NWP 48 applies retroactively to projects previously verified under that permit.  Additionally, as a condition of its partial stay of vacatur, ongoing operations must apply for an individual Section 404 permit within the next six months. It is unclear whether the parties will appeal to the Ninth Circuit. Regardless, however, there will be much interim activity and uncertainty for both the Corps and Washington shellfish growers to fill the void left by the vacated NWP 48.

© 2020 Beveridge & Diamond PC National Law Review, Volume X, Number 171



About this Author

James M. Auslander Natural Resources & Project Development Attorney Beveridge & Diamond Washington, DC

James (Jamie) M. Auslander's legal practice focuses on project development, natural resources, and administrative law and litigation.

Mr. Auslander co-chairs Beveridge & Diamond’s Natural Resources and Project Development Practice Group, including its Energy Practice. He focuses on complex legal issues surrounding the development of oil and gas, hard rock minerals, renewable energy, and other natural resources on public lands onshore and on the Outer Continental Shelf. He frequently litigates appeals before federal courts and administrative bodies regarding rulemakings, permits...

Kirstin K. Gruver Environmental Litigation Attorney Beveridge & Diamond Seattle, WA

Kirstin Gruver is efficient and responsive to clients' needs.

She maintains a diverse environmental litigation and regulatory practice, working with clients nationwide across industrial sectors with a focus on wetlands and water issues. She also has experience in product stewardship and sustainability matters.

Prior to joining Beveridge & Diamond, Kirstin worked as a deputy prosecuting attorney at the Clark County Prosecutor's office. She also worked as a legal intern with the Department of Transportation, Maritime Administration, and as a summer clerk at Earthjustice....