Eric is a leading energy and natural resources attorney in the Pacific Northwest.
He assists renewable and traditional energy companies, as well as major energy consumers, to navigate the complex legal and regulatory systems governing the nation’s energy industry. With more than 30 years of experience, Eric has successfully represented clients in litigation and regulatory matters, ranging from the U.S. Supreme Court to proceedings before federal and state agencies. Before entering private practice, Eric served as Assistant General Counsel at Snohomish County (WA) Public Utility District, one of the largest publicly-owned utilities in the U.S., and as a trial attorney at the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
Eric’s litigation experience includes successfully representing Snohomish County Public Utility District in a series of lawsuits arising from the Enron crisis involving action at every level of the federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, as well as administrative litigation resulting in an order requiring Enron to disgorge more than $1 billion. He has also litigated dozens of matters in the federal and state courts. These include federal court challenges to the landmark federal orders restructuring regulation of the electricity, natural gas, and oil pipeline industries in the U.S. and critical regulatory and Constitutional issues in the Washington courts, including several matters before the Washington Supreme Court.
Eric guides clients through transactions involving renewable and traditional energy facilities, energy and derivatives trades, environmental concerns, engineering and construction services, early-stage and traditional financing, risk management, and government grants and tax incentives. He assists clients with energy and infrastructure transactions throughout Washington, including wind generation, hydroelectric, and renewable energy projects as well as the contracts governing sales of power and transmission from the Northwest’s huge federal hydroelectric and transmission systems. He has put together transactions involving financing, engineering services, construction of buildings and similar facilities, and energy and commodity trades.
Eric also assisted with landmark litigation in both the state and federal courts as well as successfully litigated claims involving liability for hazardous waste contamination and assisted developers to reclaim and redevelop brownfields sites.
More Legal and Business Bylines From Eric L. Christensen
- Changing Climate for Corporate Disclosures: SEC Mandates Climate Disclosures for Public Companies - (Posted On Monday, March 11, 2024)
- FWS Issues Streamlined General Permits for Incidental Take of Eagles - (Posted On Friday, February 23, 2024)
- EPA Proposes Oil and Gas Sector Methane Fee - (Posted On Tuesday, February 06, 2024)
- Pacific Northwest Climate Law Update: Recent Developments Cloud the Future of Oregon and Washington Climate Programs - (Posted On Thursday, January 04, 2024)
- EPA Finalizes Air Rule Targeting Oil and Gas Industry Methane Emissions - (Posted On Thursday, December 14, 2023)
- California Requires Disclosures for Voluntary Carbon Offsets and Climate-Related Claims Beginning in 2024 - (Posted On Friday, October 27, 2023)
- Supreme Court Narrows CWA Jurisdiction Over Waters of the U.S. - (Posted On Wednesday, October 18, 2023)
- California to Require Climate Disclosures from Large Companies - (Posted On Tuesday, September 26, 2023)
- The Biden Boomerang Effect Reaches Clean Water Act Section 401 - (Posted On Thursday, September 21, 2023)
- Fourth Circuit Weighs In On Rules For Clean Water Act’s One-Year Deadline for State Water Quality Certifications for Federal Discharge Permits - (Posted On Thursday, September 21, 2023)
The National Law Review names Beveridge & Diamond a Go-To Thought Leader in the field of environmental law for the year 2022. Authors Eric L. Christensen, Brook J. Detterman, David M. Friedland, Jennifer J. Leech, and Zachary B. Pilchen authored the article "Key Takeaways from U.S. Supreme Court Decision in West Virginia v. EPA," detailing the considerable importance of this landmark SCOTUS ruling for environmental and administrative law. Their thought leadership saw significant readership throughout the year, demonstrating the high quality and timeliness of their work.