September 21, 2021

Volume XI, Number 264

Advertisement

September 21, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 20, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Federal Judge Dismisses Putative Class Action Complaint on Chocolate-less White Chips

  • On April 8, 2020, a California federal judge dismissed a putative class action complaint challenging Ghirardelli Chocolate Co.’s labels on its cocoa-free white baking chips. Cheslow, et al. v. Ghirardelli Chocolate Co., Case No. 19-cv-07467-PJH, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62044 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2020).

  • Plaintiffs asserted they purchased Ghirardelli’s “Premium Baking Chips Classic White Chips” under the impression that they contained “real” white chocolate, and that the product label, advertising, and marketing (including use of the term “premium”; references to “white” chips; and inclusion (until at least June 2019) of the term “chocolate” on product packaging and website) would mislead and deceive a reasonable consumer to believe the product contained “real” white chocolate.  Plaintiffs alleged that due to the absence of cocoa butter/cacao fat, however, and the use of purportedly inferior ingredients such as hydrogenated and palm oils, the product contains “fake” white chocolate instead.

  • Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton (Northern District of California) granted Ghirardelli’s motion to dismiss, noting, among other things: the words “chocolate” and “cocoa” did not appear anywhere on the product label, at the time of the order (other than as part of Ghirardelli’s logo, which did not apply); the word “white” in “White Chips” defined the color of the food and not the quality of the product (“white wine may define the characteristic of the wine’s color but does not inform the consumer whether the wine is a zinfandel or gewürztraminer”); and the use of “premium” constituted mere puffery.

  • While the motion was dismissed without prejudice and plaintiffs were granted leave to amend their complaint, Judge Hamilton noted that
    “[b]ecause defendant’s product packaging would not change in an amended complaint, the court is skeptical that the complaint can be amended to state a claim.”

© 2021 Keller and Heckman LLPNational Law Review, Volume X, Number 108
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Keller and Heckman offers global food and drug services to its clients. Our comprehensive and extensive food and drug practice is one of the largest in the world. We promote, protect, and defend products made by the spectrum of industries regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Commission and Member States authorities in the European Union (EU) and similar authorities throughout the world. The products we help get to market include foods, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, veterinary products, dietary supplements, and cosmetics. In addition...

202-434-4100
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement