September 24, 2021

Volume XI, Number 267


September 23, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 22, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 21, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Federal Packaging Extended Producer Responsibility Legislation Under Development

For the first time in decades, federal legislators will soon consider legislation that would require manufacturers to manage and finance end-of-life recycling programs for product packaging. The bill would reflect proliferating extended producer responsibility (EPR) laws in U.S. states and municipalities, as well as abroad.  An outline of the planned legislation was published by Sen. Tom Udall (D-NM) and Rep. Adam Lowenthal (D-Calif.) in July, and comments will be accepted until August 21, 2019. The legislation is expected to be introduced in the fall.

Outline of Planned Legislation

The outline states that the key components of the legislation will include:

  • Requiring product manufacturers to design, manage, and finance end-of-life management for the packaging of their products. The outline does not specify what types of packaging would be included in, or excluded from, the legislation. However, the outline mentions the following as potentially in scope: food containers, packets, and wrappers; drink containers, cups, and lids; tobacco products with filters; wet wipes; and lightweight plastic bags.

  • Imposing national deposit requirements on beverage containers. The legislation would cover glass, plastic, and aluminum, and would require major beverage manufacturers to operate reverse vending systems.

  • Imposing a carryout bag fee. The legislation would require vendors to impose a fee when providing consumers with non-reusable paper and plastic bags.

  • Banning styrofoam. The legislation would ban the use of styrofoam in food packaging, disposable coolers, and shipping packaging.

  • Imposing labeling requirements for plastic. Plastic products would be required to bear labels indicating the presence of plastic and how the product should be disposed.

  • Setting recyclability and recycled content thresholds. The legislation would require that plastic bottles, packaging, and certain other products be 100% recyclable and contain significant recycled content.

Similar Developments in Other Countries and U.S. States and Municipalities

The federal legislation will be introduced at a time when many U.S. states and municipalities, as well as other countries, have considered similar measures. It is currently unclear to what extent the federal legislation, if enacted, would preempt existing state and local laws.

  • Legislators in California are considering bills that would require a dramatic reduction by 2030 in the waste generated from single-use packaging and certain priority single-use plastic products. Related measures were recently debated in Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and the State of Washington.

  • The EU has adopted a single-use plastics directive that includes requirements around extended producer responsibility, labeling, recycled content, separate collection for bottles, and a ban on certain styrofoam products. Together, those requirements cover a variety single-use plastics, including: food containers, packets, and wrappers; drink containers, cups, and lids; tobacco products with filters; wet wipes; and, lightweight plastic bags, among others.

  • Many countries, states, and municipalities have enacted laws that either ban retailers from providing single-use plastic bags to consumers or require consumers to pay a bag fee.

  • Ten states have enacted “bottle bills” requiring consumers to pay a refundable deposit when purchasing a drink container.

  • Many states and localities have imposed EPR obligations on manufacturers and retailers of electronics, pharmaceuticals, paint, carpeting, and thermostats. These laws deal principally with products and not packaging.

© 2021 Beveridge & Diamond PC National Law Review, Volume IX, Number 218

About this Author

Ryan J. Carra Environmental Attorney Beveridge & Diamond Washington, DC

A Ph.D. in Organic Chemistry compliments Ryan's law practice.

Ryan uses his extensive technical background to counsel clients in the chemicals, products, and energy sectors regarding environmental regulatory issues. Ryan’s experience includes:

  • Advising clients on Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) matters, including implementation of the 2016 reform legislation.
  • Advising product manufacturers, retailers, and other clients on extended producer responsibility, waste classification, chemical hazard classification, chemical notification...
Dacia T. Meng Producer Responsibility Initiatives Attorney Beveridge & Diamond Washington, DC

Dacie Meng advises clients on domestic and international circular economy and extended producer responsibility initiatives.

She specializes in end-of-life management of plastics, packaging, electronics, pharmaceuticals, and other products in the U.S. and globally.

Dacie regularly advises on requirements governing transboundary shipments of products for reuse, repair, and recycling. She also supports the development of product stewardship programs across the country in compliance with extended producer responsibility legislation.

In addition, Dacie counsels clients...