April 23, 2019

April 23, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

April 22, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Future of United States – Chile Bilateral Tax Treaty Remains Uncertain

On February 4, 2010, after more than a decade of negotiations, government officials from the United States and Chile executed the first bilateral income tax treaty (“Tax Treaty”) between the two countries. This event marked an important next step in economic cooperation; the United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement, which entered into force on January 1, 2004, had already significantly increased free trade by removing tariffs, reducing barriers, and providing necessary legal protections for investors from both countries. The Tax Treaty was designed to further encourage the stream of cross-border investments and widen the United States’ tax treaty network in Latin America beyond Mexico and Venezuela.

HandshakeHowever, 7 years later, the Tax Treaty has not yet entered into force – while it was approved by the Chilean Congress in 2015, it has not been ratified by the U.S. Senate. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved the Tax Treaty in both 2011 and 2015, but Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) has placed a hold on the Tax Treaty, along with tax treaties with 7 other countries, due to concerns that the exchange of information provisions infringe on personal privacy, blocking their consideration by the full chamber. To date, no compromise has been reached, and the future of the Tax Treaty remains uncertain, particularly under the current administration. President Trump’s trade policies seem so far to prioritize the review of the United States’ existing free trade agreements – and in the case of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), even renegotiation.

Recent corporate tax hikes in Chile have further highlighted the need for a United States-Chile tax treaty. Under a new Chilean tax law that went into effect on October 1, 2014, corporate tax rates are gradually increasing and are scheduled to reach a peak in 2018. Moreover, as part of the tax reform legislation, Chile implemented a dual tax system in early 2017 requiring company shareholders to select one of two tax regimes: (1) a fully-integrated regime under which shareholders are taxed at an effective tax rate of 35% of their share of company profits as they accrue annually; or (2) a partially-integrated system under which shareholders are taxed at a higher effective tax rate of 44.45% but only when profits are distributed. Both tax regimes have a negative impact on shareholders’ dividend income since the fully-integrated regime preserves the pre-tax reform effective tax rate but deprives shareholders from deferral of recognition of income, while the partially-integrated system allows for such deferral but raises the effective tax rate significantly.

Typically, an income tax treaty protects investors against the effects of such tax increases by setting a threshold on dividend withholding tax (e.g., 5, 10 or 15%). In its current form, the Tax Treaty contains a dividend withholding provision, but only in favor of Chilean resident shareholders receiving dividends from United States corporations. Thus, United States investors will not be able to rely on the Tax Treaty in its current form for complete protection from the negative impacts of the new tax regime, and may have to turn to other alternatives, such as investments through intermediary foreign entities.

We will continue to monitor the progression of the Tax Treaty in the U.S. Senate and whether President Trump seeks to revise it to address privacy concerns and secure further protections for U.S. investors.

© Copyright 2019 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Eugenia Mize, Squire Patton, Energy Transactions Lawyer, renewable energy project development attorney
Associate

Eugenia Mize is a lawyer in the firm’s Energy & Natural Resources Practice based in the Washington DC office. Her practice focuses on transactions in the energy sector, including renewable energy project development.

Prior to joining Squire Patton Boggs, Eugenia was in-house counsel for a multinational power generation company where she led numerous negotiations for the development of large scale power plant projects with commercial and government clients in North and South America. She also managed multiple development funding agreements...

202-457-5251
Ludmilla L. Savelieff, Policy Attorney, Squire Patton Boggs Law Firm
Associate

Ludmilla Savelieff draws on her experience in both domestic and international policy to assist clients on a variety of regulatory, legislative, and legal matters.

Prior to law school, Ms. Savelieff was the Special Assistant to the Chairman of the White House Council on Environmental Quality, where she gained first-hand experience in the daily operations of the Executive Branch. While at the Council, she worked closely with the Chairman and his team of policy advisors in the development and management of significant Administration policies and programs, such as the Major Economies Meetings on Energy Security and Climate Change.

202-457-5125