Skip to main content

May 27, 2022

Volume XII, Number 147

National Law Review
  • Login
  • FB
  • twt
  • link
  • home
  • rss
Advertisement
  • logo
  • Publish / Advertise with Us
    • Publish
    • Advertise
    • Publishing Firms
    • E Newsbulletins
    • Law Student Writing Contest
    • Contact Us
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Join Our Team
    • Search
  • Trending Legal News
    • Most Recent
    • Legal News Podcast
    • What's Trending
    • Type of Law
      • Antitrust Law
      • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
      • Biotech, Food & Drug
      • Business of Law
      • Construction & Real Estate
      • Cybersecurity Media & FCC
      • Election & Legislative
      • Environmental & Energy
      • Family, Estates & Trusts
      • Financial, Securities & Banking
      • Global
      • Health Care Law
      • Immigration
      • Insurance
      • Intellectual Property Law
      • Labor & Employment
      • Litigation
      • Public Services, Infrastructure, Transportation
      • Tax
      • White Collar Crime & Consumer Rights
    • E Newsbulletins
    • Legal Educational Events
    • NLR Blog
    • Search
  • About Us
    • About the NLR
    • NLR Team
    • Publishing Firms
    • E Newsbulletins
    • NLR Thought Leadership Awards
      • 2018
      • 2019
      • 2020
      • 2021
    • NLR Blog
    • Contact Us
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Search
  • Contact Us
    • Contact Us
    • E Newsbulletins
    • Publish
    • Advertise
    • Law Student Writing Contest
    • Search
  • Quick Links
    • Legal News Podcast
    • Type of Law
      • Antitrust Law
      • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
      • Biotech, Food & Drug
      • Business of Law
      • Construction & Real Estate
      • Cybersecurity Media & FCC
      • Election & Legislative
      • Environmental & Energy
      • Family, Estates & Trusts
      • Financial, Securities & Banking
      • Global
      • Health Care Law
      • Immigration
      • Insurance
      • Intellectual Property Law
      • Labor & Employment
      • Litigation
      • Public Services, Infrastructure, Transportation
      • Tax
      • White Collar Crime & Consumer Rights
    • E Newsbulletins
    • Legal Educational Events
    • Law Student Writing Contest
    • NLR Blog
    • Contact Us
    • Search
  • ENEWSBULLETINS

 

New Articles
Bottom Row Image
Advertisement

May 26, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
  • California Supreme Court Adds New Employer Obligations for Meal and... by: Brandon Miller
  • EPA Authorizes Anti-Monkeypox Claims for Pre-Designated Disinfectant... by: Alan J. Sachs and Kathryn E. Szmuszkovicz
  • Rhode Island Legalizes Recreational Marijuana and Protects Off-Duty... by: Catherine A. Cano
  • Electric Vehicles and Their Impact on Land Use and Development by: John F. Lushis, Jr. and Thomas H. Dinkelacker
  • Preparing for an On-the-Record (OTR) Interview: What Brokers Need to... by: Dr. Nick Oberheiden
  • California Employers Must Know: Meal/Rest Premiums Are ‘Wages’ by: Armida Derzakarian
  • The Hunt for Clarity in Eligibility for Temporary Total Disability by: Theresa M. Muhic and Anthony "T.J." Jagoditz
  • Illinois Amends ‘One Day Rest in Seven’ Law, With Significant... by: Kathryn Montgomery Moran and James D. Thomas
  • Roetzel HealthLaw HotSpot: How to Spot Unethical Business Conduct in... by: Ericka L. Adler
  • Washington State’s Economy-Wide Climate Plan Takes Shape: Ecology... by: Eric L. Christensen and Brook J. Detterman
  • Junior Creditors Beware: Third Circuit Awards Damages for Breach of... by: Ingrid Bagby and Michele C. Maman
  • The Performance Review Episode 15: Fit Fam - Lifting the Weight of... by: Ryan Bykerk and Philip Person
  • Texas Supreme Court Clarifies Standard for Payment of Commissions... by: Lawrence D. Smith
  • Expert Witness Qualifications, Trends, & Leadership – Episode 37... by: Erica Evans and Adam Bloomberg
  • Small Businesses Don’t Recognize Risk of Cyber-Attack Despite... by: Linn F. Freedman
  • Premium Processing Will Soon Be Available for EB-1C and EB-2 NIW I-... by: Immigration & Nationality Law Practice
  • USPTO Transitions to Electronic Trademark Registration Certificates by: Matthew J. Smith
  • FDA Webinar on Action Levels for Lead in Juice by: Food and Drug Law at Keller and Heckman
  • ISO Publishes Standard on Characterization of CNT and CNF Aerosols... by: Lynn L. Bergeson and Carla N. Hutton
  • It's About Time: Federal Court Addresses Delta-8 by: Allen N. Trask, III and Amy H. Wooten
  • USCIS Extends Premium-Processing to Certain Pending Immigrant... by: Phillip Pullig and Katie P. Jacob
  • Working through the new EU SCCs? European Commission Releases FAQs by: Julia K. Kadish
  • Chicago Public Schools Notifying Students and Staff of Vendor’s... by: Linn F. Freedman
  • Data Breach Class Action Against Radiology Companies Dismissed for... by: Kathryn M. Rattigan
  • Immigration Forward - Episode 2: Diversity in the Arts with Melanie... by: William C. Menard
  • CFPB Uses Springtime To Grow Authority by: Craig N. Landrum
  • DOJ’s New CFAA Policy: Relief for White Hat Hackers and Web Scrapers? by: Scott Ferber and Todd S. McClelland
  • Asia Pacific Legal Market Summary And Partner Moves - May 2022 by: Maggie Kwok
  • USPTO Issuing E-Registration Certificates by: Trademark, Copyright & Advertising Counseling at Foley & Lardner LLP
  • EPA Withdraws its Direct Final Rule to Adopt the New ASTM E1527-21... by: David P. Ruetz
  • FTC Adopts Policy Statement to Increase Scrutiny for COPPA Violations by: Kathryn M. Rattigan
  • Delay in Enforcing Trademark Measured from When Infringement Became... by: Eleanor B. Atkins
  • Supreme Court Rejects Prejudice Requirement for Waiver of Arbitration... by: Larry J. Saylor and Nhan T. Ho
  • Florida Gov. Signs Bill that Defines ‘Virtual Currency’ and Eases... by: Carl A. Fornaris and Marina Olman-Pal
  • Voiceprints and Biometric Litigation by: Kathryn M. Rattigan
  • How Changing Beneficial Ownership Reporting May Impact Activism by: Alexandra Clark Layfield and Rachel Solino
  • Big News at The FTC: Democrats Finally Get the Majority Back by: Eric J. Troutman
  • Borrower/Lender Disagreements in PPP Loan Forgiveness Applications by: Theodora McCormick and Robert Lufrano
  • Small Businesses Don’t Recognize Risk of Cyberattack Despite Repeated... by: Linn F. Freedman
  • SEC Anti-Greenwashing Rules Approved At Hearing by: John Gardella
  • How to Make Informed Performance Bond and International Arbitration... by: Martin Gusy and Robert Meade
  • There Should Be No Secret about Scope of Trade Secret Injunction by: Jodi Benassi
  • Will FDA’s Proposed Ban on Flavored Tobacco Products Ever be... by: Devaki Patel and David L. Rosen
  • Texas Takes Much-Anticipated Steps to Streamline Permitting and... by: Lydia González Gromatzky and Frederick R. Eames
  • Privacy Tip #333 – Chatbots Used to Steal Credentials by: Linn F. Freedman
  • BIG NEWS IN THE BIG APPLE: New York Legislature Passes Law Requiring... by: Eric J. Troutman
  • California Supreme Court Raises the Stakes (Again) on Meal and Rest... by: Todd L. Nunn and Penny Chen
  • China Releases Draft Cross-Border Personal Information Transfer... by: Sherry Xiaoxuan Ding and Gretchen A. Ramos
  • Getting Local: Requirements for San Francisco Employers by: Lisa Barnett Sween and Trey Sims
  • Cybersecurity, Data Privacy and Sanctions Developments [VIDEO] by: Seth D. DuCharme and Lucy Porter
  • If You Can’t Stand the Heat, Don’t Build the Kitchen: Construction... by: Eva Gunasekera and Renée Brooker
  • SEC Announces Disclosures and Rules Changes Intended to Combat "... by: Jacob H. Hupart
  • Time Bar Dismissal Saves Patent Found Unpatentable by: Bhanu K. Sadasivan, Ph.D.
  • Key Takeaways from AmericaMakes: 2022 RAPID + TCT Additive... by: Brooke C. Bahlinger and Gary B. Solomon
  • Can A Corporation Pledge Its Own Shares? by: Keith Paul Bishop
  • Managing the LIBOR Transition in GCC Islamic Financings [VIDEO] by: Oliver Irwin and Shayan Najib
  • ESG Task Force Climate Settlement Is First Of Many To Come by: John Gardella
  • Is Nevada’s Collateral Source Rule Changing? by: Michael Lowry

May 25, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
  • What’s the Big Deal About Dark Patterns? by: Liisa M. Thomas and James V. Fazio
  • Rachel Bloomekatz Nominated to the Sixth Circuit by: Litigation Group Squire Patton Boggs
  • Supreme Court Discrimination Case Narrows Scope of Restitution for... by: Audrey Crowell and Sara Helene Shanti
  • NJDEP Announces FHA Emergency Rulemaking by: Michael J. Gross and Marc D. Policastro
  • FCC Announces Nine More State Robocall Investigation Partnerships by: Paul C. Besozzi
  • U.S. Supreme Court Eliminates Prejudice Requirement for Waiver of... by: Lindsay Sampson Bishop and John L. Gavin
  • Attorney-Client Privilege Issues: Illinois Corporations and Other... by: Kirstie Brenson and Adam Diederich
  • 10 Productive Things to Do on Social Media When You’re Uncomfortable... by: Stefanie M. Marrone
  • Former Employee Adequately Alleged Disability Under The ADA by: Anthony J Oncidi
  • Monkeypox—Do Employers Need to Worry? by: Katherine Dudley Helms
  • USCIS to Implement Premium Processing for Certain Pending EB-1, EB-2... by: Sheila T. Minihane
  • California Resident May Rely Upon Labor Code § 925 To Challenge Non-... by: Anthony J Oncidi
  • USPTO Moves to Electronic Trademark Registration Certificates by: Joseph S. Heino and Erin E. Kaprelian
  • USCIS to Implement Premium Processing for Certain Previously Filed... by: Shannon N. Parker
  • Update on Securities and Exchange Commission’s Landmark Proposed... by: Kevin A. Ewing and Rachel B. Goldman
  • Heating Things Up: OSHA Launches National Standard Outdoor and Indoor... by: Jane H. Heidingsfelder
  • Proving Liability Against Apartment Buildings by: Lawrence J. Buckfire
  • SCOTUS Cert Recap: Venue For Constitutional Challenges To SEC... by: Kian Hudson and Sarah E. Brown
  • Second Circuit Reverses Dismissal of Securities Claim Alleging... by: Jonathan E Richman
  • New York Establishes First Pharmacy Benefits Bureau in the Nation as... by: Tara E. Swenson Dwyer and Cody Keetch
  • Employee with Mild Symptoms of COVID-19 Was Not “Disabled” Under... by: Anthony J Oncidi and Wesley C. Shelton
  • FTC Targets Children’s Privacy and Stealth Advertising Directed at... by: Alan L. Friel and Kyle R. Dull
  • DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD: Call Recording Sinks TCPA Defendant’s Claim of... by: Eric J. Troutman
  • Reminder: San Francisco’s Family Friendly Workplace Amended Ordinance... by: Peter Y. Lee
  • California Supreme Court Holds Meal Period Premiums Are “Wages” and... by: Raymond J. Nhan and Gregg A. Fisch
  • Supreme Court Rules That Prejudice Is Not a Required Element To... by: Michael L. Stevens
  • Connecticut Makes Significant Changes to its Collaborative Drug... by: Michael G. Lisitano and Nathaniel T. Arden
  • Federal Court Finds Tort Claims Preempted by CERCLA Consent Decree by: Brent A. Rosser and Kate Perkins
  • We Shouldn't Be Surprised the Massachusetts AG Is Doing to PFAS... by: Jeffrey R. Porter
  • Navigating the Data Privacy Landscape for Autonomous and Connected... by: Adam J. Brody and John J. Rolecki
  • Medicare Advantage: OIG Report Finds Improper Denials by: Alexis Finkelberg Bortniker and C. Frederick Geilfuss II
  • Modifications to Proposition 65 Short-Form Warnings on Pause – New... by: Lynn R. Fiorentino and Shayshari Potter
  • How Do State Statutes Differ in Terms of How They Define “Targeted... by: David A. Zetoony
  • UK Sanctions Update - Ban on Services and Prevention of... by: Michael E. Ruck and Rosie Naylor
  • In Case You Missed Our Webinar “Navigating Opportunities and... by: Data Privacy & Cybersecurity
  • Pop-Tarts False Ad Lawsuit Permanently Dismissed by: Food and Drug Law at Keller and Heckman
  • A Few Things You Should Know in Case of Windstorm Damage to Your Home... by: Michael J. Parrish and Amy H. Wooten
  • North Carolina Prohibits Public Sector Entities from Paying Ransom in... by: Joseph J. Lazzarotti
  • EU Commission Publishes Draft Directive to Remove Tax Driven Debt-... by: Robert Gaut and Emma C. McDonnell
  • Employers Beware: Take-Home COVID Cases are on the Rise (US) by: Karen E. Wentzel and Cristen R. Hintze
  • MEANWHILE IN WASHINGTON: New Law Taking Effect June 9 Requires... by: Eric J. Troutman
  • CBP Releases Known Importer Letters and Enforcement Guidance relating... by: Alexis B. Chandler
  • Netflix “Sees What’s Next” with New Policy Addressing Employee... by: Anthony J Oncidi and Dylan K. Tedford
  • Ronaldinho and Henry Marks Step Over Bad Faith Finding by: Simon Casinader and Niall J. Lavery
  • Whose Law Applies To LLC Alter Ego Claims? by: Keith Paul Bishop

May 24, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
  • DOJ Limits Application of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, Providing... by: Kyle R. Freeny and Linda Ricci
  • Outside the Beltway of Health Care - Episode 17 [PODCAST] by: Harry Sporidis and Barry D. Alexander
  • DOJ Revises Policy for CFAA Prosecution to Reflect Developments in... by: Jeffrey D. Neuburger
  • Homeland Security Prepares for Increase in Migration by: Raymond G. Lahoud
  • Washington Becomes Latest State to Tighten Restrictions on... by: Joseph C. Wylie II and Molly K. McGinley
  • What Principles of Explainability and Transparency Should an Employer... by: Nathaniel M. Glasser and Alexander J. Franchilli
  • Two More Nails in the Coffin for Opportunistic Data Breach Claims by: Victoria Leigh
  • Meal Period Violations Trigger Slew of Additional Penalties,... by: Lindsay E. Hutner and Samuel S. Hyde
  • City of Chicago Expands Protections for Victims of Sexual Harassment by: Jennifer L. Colvin and Sam Sedaei
  • CFPB’s Administrative Changes to Enforcement Raise Industry Concerns by: Rusty Melges and Brandon Hill
  • Adding Impact to Your Next Cross Examination: 5 Things to Consider... by: Adam Bloomberg
  • Cybersecurity to Protect Critical Infrastructure Is a Top Priority... by: Peter Vogel
  • IRS Appeals Acknowledges Massive Backlog of Cases, Shares Plan to... by: Andrew R. Roberson and Kevin Spencer
  • Federal Trade Commission Petitioned To Investigate Electric Utilities by: John D. Carroll and Joseph Antel
  • EPA Extends Comment Period for Proposed Rule to Ban Ongoing Uses of... by: Lynn L. Bergeson and Carla N. Hutton
  • The State of U.S. State Privacy Laws: A Comparison by: Sheila A. Millar and Tracy P. Marshall
  • A New Wave of Unionization is Driving Change; Make Sure Your... by: Katelynn M. Williams and Mark J. Neuberger
  • OFCCP Announces Option to Bulk Upload for Large Federal Contractors by: Guy Brenner and Megan A. Childs
  • Beijing IP Court Dismisses First Trademark Case Under New Supreme... by: Aaron Wininger
  • Federal Circuit Declines to Extend Blue & Gold Waiver Rule in... by: Aron C. Beezley and Patrick R. Quigley
  • US Issues Guidance to Companies Warning of Cybersecurity and... by: Hunton Andrews Kurth’s Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Cal/OSHA Extends COVID-19 Regulations Through December 2022 by: Jessalee L. Landfried and Jayni A. Lanham
  • Cal/OSHA Releases Guidance on New COVID-19 ETS Impacting Employers... by: Susan F. Wiltsie and Blake E. Guerrero
  • Looking For Cryptocurrency In All The Wrong Places . . . by: Keith Paul Bishop
  • Breaking News: California Break Premium Pay Can Trigger Waiting Time... by: Paul R. Lynd and Lynn R. Fiorentino
  • OSHA’s Permanent COVID-19 Standard and Enforcement Blitz – Diagnosing... by: Denise Merna Dadika and Robert J. O’Hara
  • FDA Denies Request to Exempt D-Tagatose from Added Sugar Labeling by: Food and Drug Law at Keller and Heckman
  • Federal Court Calls Unconstitutional the U.S. Securities &... by: Matthew P. Allen and Thomas W. Cranmer
  • USCIS to Hold EB-5 Reform Listening Session May 25 by: Julia Holod
  • Washington State’s Silenced No More Act, Which Largely Prohibits... by: Lori A. Medley
  • EEOC, DOJ Release Expectations on Employers’ Use of Technology, AI... by: Joseph J. Lazzarotti and Paul Patten
  • Where Exactly Does an Opt-Out of Targeted Advertising Link Need to Be... by: David A. Zetoony
  • Increasing Due Diligence Before Token Listings to Uncover Fraud by: Matthew E. Brown and Matthew B. Lerner
  • DOJ’s Cyber-Fraud Initiative: Increased False Claims Act Scrutiny of... by: Scott A. Schipma and Aaron M. Levin
  • Four Ways to Avoid General Solicitation in Private Offerings by: Matthew W. Bower
  • Litigation Minute: Mitigating Class Action Risks Posed by Collecting... by: Nelson M. Hua and Desiree F. Moore
  • 66,000 Prescriptions in 3 Years: Pharmacy Owners Convicted for... by: Eva Gunasekera and Renée Brooker
  • Indiana Tightens the State’s Deadline for Providing Notification of a... by: Joseph J. Lazzarotti
  • Mental Health in the Workplace: Addressing Employee Wellness and... by: William E. Grob and Zachary V. Zagger
  • Lombard v Skyjets: Key Takeaways for Lenders and Restructuring... by: Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
  • Is Motivation To Obtain A Patent Motivation For Obviousness? by: Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
  • California High Court Rules Missed Meal Break Premiums Are ‘Wages’ by: Michael J. Nader and Robert R. Roginson
  • The Garrulous Gavel: Lawyers for All Humans and the Legal Services... by: Jonathan Tycko
  • FTC Imposes Multi-Million Dollar Penalties for Deceptive Consumer... by: Susan M. Kayser
  • California Supreme Court Rules Meal and Rest Break Premiums... by: Kate Gold and Ariel N. Brotman
  • U.S. Supreme Court Holds Waiver of Arbitration Rights Does Not... by: Samia M. Kirmani and Scott P. Jang
  • Illinois Issues Proposed Regulations in Connection With Equal Pay... by: Jennifer L. Colvin and Sarah J. Platt
  • A Renewed Focus on Stablecoins [PODCAST] by: Anne M. Termine
  • Deputizing State AGs: CFPB Issues Broad New Interpretive Rule on... by: Tonya M. Esposito and Benjamin M. Saul

Article By

Natalia M. Szlarb

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Lex Arbitri
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP full service Global 100 law firm handling corporate law

Related Practices & Jurisdictions


  • ADR / Arbitration / Mediation
  • Administrative & Regulatory
  • Communications, Media & Internet
  • Global
  • European Union
  • Printer-friendly
  • Email this Article
  • Download PDF
  • REPRINTS & PERMISSIONS
Tweet
Advertisement

GDPR and International Arbitration at a Crossroads

Wednesday, December 4, 2019

The International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA) and the International Bar Association (IBA) have established a Joint Task Force on Data Protection in International Arbitration Proceedings. The task force will develop guidance for arbitration professionals with regard to data protection in arbitration proceedings. This guidance, which is expected to be published for comment later this year or in early 2020, aims provide practical guidance on the potential impact of data protection principles. In particular, it will recommend how information and evidence subject to the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) is to be handled in international arbitration proceedings.

The task force arose because of the supranational impact of GDPR. In international arbitration proceedings, information and evidence are gathered and transferred to the opposing party, counsel, arbitrators, and professional third parties across different jurisdictions. Because such evidence or information may be subject to the GDPR’s data protection framework, a careful review at the onset of the arbitration is required to determine whether electronically stored information can be transferred (and produced to other parties), and if so, how. Failure to comply with restrictions on the use of electronic data can result in punitive sanctions. For example, a violation of GDPR can lead to a penalty of up to 4% percent of a company’s global annual revenue or €20 million, whichever is higher.

The GDPR came into effect in 2018. It holds as fundamental that processing of protected personal information is prohibited unless expressly permitted by the GDPR.  As an EU Regulation, no local law implementation is required to adopt the GDPR, and it applies directly in each member state of EU.  Its application is broad. GDPR applies to any company or entity that controls or processes “personal data” as part of the activities of its branches established in the EU, or if it targets or monitors “data subjects” in the EU, regardless of the company’s location.

Protected “personal data” relates to the information of an identifier–data subject–and covers simple information such as work email address, telephone number or IP address, and generally anything through which a person can be identified. The “data controller” means any person or organizational body that determines the means of processing personal data. “The data processor” refers to any entity that processes personal data on behalf of the data controller. The GDPR also defines “processing” very broadly as any operation that is performed on personal data and specifically includes activities such as collection, use, disclosure by transmission, and dissemination, or otherwise making available personal data.

These broad definitions of personal data and data processing mean that GDPR can apply to any party, counsel, arbitrator, tribunal or professional third party participating in an arbitration within the GDPR’s reach. Personal data processing during an arbitration includes review of information or evidence by which an individual is identified or identifiable, even if the personal data is contained in a business-related document.

There are exemptions under GDPR which allow sharing of personal information under specified circumstances. These include, among other things, the explicit and well-informed consent from the data subjects, and, importantly, the necessity to process personal data for the performance of a contract, or to comply with a legal obligation, or for the purpose of a legitimate interest.  Interestingly, while a document production in international arbitration would appear at first glance to fall into the category “compliance with a legal obligation,” the exemption only explicitly covers legal obligations created by Member State law such as a court order, not ones created by an arbitral tribunal order. Whether, in fact, data processing and sharing in international arbitration falls within this exemption, is still a matter of debate. Nonetheless, the general understanding is that disclosure obligations in arbitral proceedings satisfy at least the last exemption provided for in the GDPR, i.e., the processing is necessary for the purposes of legitimate interests pursued by the data controller.

How these exemptions would be interpreted for purposes of ensuring the integrity of evidentiary deliberation in an international arbitration would need to be carefully monitored. It certainly will require a careful balance between the data subject’s interests and the interest of maintaining a robust evidentiary process in an international arbitration proceeding. As it currently stands, the data controllers and processors, i.e., party, counsel, arbitrator, tribunal or experts, are required to ensure appropriate technical and organizational measures are in place to safeguard handling of personal data. This means that every arbitral participant has to consider at the outset of an arbitration whether or not GDPR applies to its use of personal data and, if so, what rules apply. Practitioners should be aware that the GDPR may be relevant to their arbitration, regardless of whether the parties are, or the arbitration is seated, in Europe.

The intersection, if not clash, of international arbitration and GDPR will certainly produce interesting decisions, awards and opinions for arbitration practitioners.

Copyright © 2022, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.National Law Review, Volume IX, Number 338
  • Printer-friendly
  • Email this Article
  • Download PDF
  • REPRINTS & PERMISSIONS
Advertisement
Advertisement

Related Legal Headlines

What’s the Big Deal About Dark Patterns?
By
Liisa M. Thomas
In Case You Missed Our Webinar “Navigating Opportunities and Challenges: Cross-border Data, the Cookiepocalypse and Standard Contractual Clauses”
By
Data Privacy & Cybersecurity
Virginia Finalizes CDPA Text With the Addition of Three Amendment Bills
By
Eva J. Pulliam
"extra, Extra, Read All About It"—final European and Uk Brand Distribution Rules Published
By
Gabriela R. Da Costa
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

California Supreme Court Adds New Employer Obligations for Meal and Rest Breaks
By
Barnes & Thornburg LLP
EPA Authorizes Anti-Monkeypox Claims for Pre-Designated Disinfectant Products
By
Beveridge & Diamond PC
Rhode Island Legalizes Recreational Marijuana and Protects Off-Duty Use
By
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Electric Vehicles and Their Impact on Land Use and Development
By
Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Natalia M. Szlarb Intellectual Property & Arbitration Attorney Sheppard Mullin Law Firm
Natalia M. Szlarb
Associate

Natalia Szlarb is an associate in the Intellectual Property Practice Group in the firm's Washington, D.C. office.

Areas of Practice

Natalia focuses her practice on international arbitration and commercial litigation. She often works on complex arbitrations governed by a variety of arbitration rules, including ICC, ICDR, UNICTRAL and AIAC.

During law school, Natalia worked as an international intern at Beijing Arbitration in China and at the International Law Institute. She also...

nszlarb@sheppardmullin.com
202-747-2322
www.sheppardmullin.com
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
National Law Review
  • Antitrust Law
  • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
  • Biotech, Food, & Drug
  • Business of Law
  • Election & Legislative
  • Construction & Real Estate
  • Environmental & Energy
  • Family, Estates & Trusts
  • Financial, Securities & Banking
  • Global
  • Health Care Law
  • Immigration
  • Intellectual Property Law
  • Insurance
  • Labor & Employment
  • Litigation
  • Cybersecurity Media & FCC
  • Public Services, Infrastructure, Transportation
  • Tax
  • White Collar Crime & Consumer Rights
  • Coronavirus News
  • Law Student Writing Competition
  • Sign Up For NLR Bulletins
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQs

 

As a woman owned company, The National Law Review is a certified member of the Women's Business Enterprise National Council

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 3 Grant Square #141 Hinsdale, IL 60521  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 or toll free (877) 357-3317.  If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.

Copyright ©2022 National Law Forum, LLC