September 21, 2020

Volume X, Number 265

September 21, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 18, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

How the COVID-19 Lockdown will Disrupt the Upfront TV Ad Market

Around 311 million people in the United States—roughly nine out of ten Americans—are under instructions to “Stay Home!”

These captive audiences have resulted in a 17% increase in TV viewership across all demographics.  Indeed, adults aged 18-34—a demographic that has been increasingly difficult for advertisers to reach on ad-supported television—spent 83 million more hours watching TV during the first week of the lockdown as compared to the last week in February.

This HAS to be great news for media networks who traditionally generate billions of dollars in linear TV advertising, right?  Maybe not.

The COVID-19 lockdown period also happens to coincide with the TV industry’s annual “upfront” marketplace.  This is the time where every big media company hosts major TV buyers, including brands and agencies, to extravagant events where the networks unveil their latest slate of programming for the upcoming season.  One could say, it’s a classic future market, where the goal is to convince media buyers to commit to ad deals for shows months away—or even the following year.  In other words, they buy the inventory up front.

Approximately $20 billion—that is billion with a “B”—in network TV advertising inventory is typically committed during this period.

However, declines in linear TV viewership coupled with the steady increase of digital native content and online, user-generated videos, have caused many to consider this upfront process as a mere relic of a bygone era.  And, even more so during this period of increased uncertainty, ad buyers may be better off waiting for the “scatter market,” when ad time is bought much closer to the air date.

Perhaps the biggest question for buyers is how robust the content will even be.  Another effect of the shelter-in-place orders are that many studios have been forced to shut down their TV and movie productions altogether.  With an already-tight production schedule looming, will this standstill result in a truncated content slate?

On the other hand, many indicators suggest that television is still the most cost-effective ad medium for large-scale campaigns.  The upfront market is a time for advertisers to lock up premium, show-based inventory before other brands can claim it.  Brands might also consider that there may well be pent up demand for content once it resumes—particularly sports broadcasts, for instance.  Thus, the ultimate driver for the upfront participation is scarcity—has this really changed?

The Myers report currently predicts a $3 billion slash of marketing and advertising budgets in 2020 because of the coronavirus pandemic.  Fears over the resultant impact on the economy are top of mind.  But, if lessons can be learned from past economic downturns, studies show that companies who cut ad spending during these times lost shares to private labels—shares they did not regain. As the old adage goes, “when times are good you should advertise; when times are bad, you must advertise.” Brand awareness is often crucial as consumers seek stability.

Even still, brands must balance the effort to remain in customer focus with shifting realities.  For instance, in order to avoid deficient supplies, some brands have asked to pull ads until they get caught up with inventory.  Similarly, to hedge their bets during this uncertain period, brands may consider redirecting linear TV investments to other inventory controlled by the TV networks, such as streaming platforms.

Media companies, for their part, should also consider offering dynamic solutions such as flexible terms, incentives for continuing to advertise, or even “make good” provisions in upfront contracts in case content is severely curtailed due to the pandemic.

While the coronavirus pandemic may prove the latest catalyst to changes to the upfront marketplace, it is unclear that it will be replaced altogether.  Only one thing appears certain, brands and networks alike are in uncharted territory.  And, an individualized, tailored approach appears crucial to successfully navigating these circumstances.

Copyright © 2020, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.National Law Review, Volume X, Number 106

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Brian D. Anderson, Intellectual Property, Attorney, Sheppard Mullin, Law firm
Associate

Brian D. Anderson is an associate in the Intellectual Property Practice Group in Sheppard Mullin's San Francisco and Palo Alto offices. He is a member of the Entertainment, Media, and Technology Industry Team.

Areas of Practice

Brian enjoys a broad intellectual property and commercial transactions, corporate, advertising and privacy and data security practice.

He focuses his practice on structuring and negotiating intellectual property and technology deals, such as...

415-774-3287
Daniel E. Schnapp Entertainment & Digital Media Sheppard Mullin New York, NY
Partner

Daniel E. Schnapp is a partner in the Entertainment and Digital Media Practice Group in the firm's New York office and Team Leader of the firm's Technology Transactions Team and Esports Industry Team.

Areas of Practice

Daniel provides strategic counsel and transactional support for multinational corporations, as well as midcap and startup companies, in connection with a wide range of legal and policy issues arising out of the convergence of technology, advertising, entertainment and media, electronic commerce, intellectual property (IP), privacy, data breach, information security, and compliance and risk management, including: 

  • Digital video and music content licensing and distribution, and related audiovisual broadcasting initiatives on all new media platforms 
  • Mobile device and online app development and licensing and distribution of social media and networking services and applications
  • Cloud-based content distribution models and enterprise cloud computing initiatives
  • Video games and interactive entertainment development, publishing, merchandising, promotion, distribution and licensing
  • Digital and traditional advertising, sponsorships, product placements and promotional arrangements
  • User-generated content ingestion, distribution and syndication
  • Strategic alliances and joint ventures "offshore," "near shore" and domestic information technology, call center, manufacturing and business process outsourcing
  • Wireless device and network application 
  • Electronic publishing and distribution
  • Viral marketing, contextual advertising and brand management
  • Promotions, sweepstakes and contests compliance
  • Record retention and disaster recovery/contingency planning compliance
  • Stored value and smart card application development
  • Digital signatures and public key infrastructures
  • Electronic payment systems and solutions and internet banking
  • Software/hardware procurement, development, licensing, distribution and export
  • Systems integration and facilities management
  • Data warehousing and mining
  • Domain name trademark disputes
  • Application storage and service provider transactions
  • Website hosting and development
  • Technology and data export compliance
  • Patent and trademark licensing
  • Intellectual property audits

Dan was selected in 2008 as one of the "Top 50 IP Attorneys Under 45" in IP Law and Business magazine.

Dan writes and lectures extensively on new developments in the areas of digital content distribution and syndication, cloud-based content distribution models, end user-generated content and social networking initiatives, outsourcing, electronic commerce, electronic payment systems, privacy and information security.

212.634.3063
Brittany Walter Intellectual property Attorney Sheppard Mullin Law Firm San Francisco

Brittany Walter is an associate in the Intellectual Property Practice Group in the firm's San Francisco office. She is a member of the Privacy and Cybersecurity Team, the Advertising Team and the Technology Transactions Team.

Areas of Practice

Brittany’s practice focuses on protecting her clients’ intellectual property rights through counseling, prosecution, enforcement and litigation.

Prosecution and Enforcement. Brittany assists with matters before the United...

415.774.2973