August 12, 2020

Volume X, Number 225

August 11, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 10, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

How to Contest a Will: The Basics

We all know that a person can control who will own his or her property after death by signing a will.  But when questions arise as to the circumstances surrounding the signing of the will, what can be done to challenge it?

The validity of a will is formally challenged in what is known as a caveat proceeding. A caveat proceeding addresses the issue of whether a will that has been admitted to probate should be declared void.

A caveat proceeding is effectively a type of lawsuit that must be filed with the Clerk of Superior Court. Caveat actions have their own special procedures (different from many other types of lawsuits) found in Chapter 31 of the North Carolina General Statutes. Any "interested person" can bring a caveat action. "Interested persons" include potential heirs to the estate in question (that is, family members who would receive property from the deceased person in the absence of a will) or beneficiaries named in a lost, destroyed, or prior will.

Most often, caveat proceedings begin after a will has been admitted to "probate in common form," or filed with certain paperwork with the Clerk of Superior Court, and a challenger, known as a "caveator," learns of facts or circumstances in which he or she believes would void the will. When the will has been probated in common form, the caveator has three years from the probate application to bring a caveat action. On rare occasions, wills are offered for probate in "solemn form."  When a will is offered for probate in solemn form, the Clerk will notify all interested parties and give them an opportunity to appear in court and state if they wish to challenge the will. If any person contests the will, the Clerk will convert the matter to a caveat proceeding. If none of the interested parties served contest the will, the probate in solemn form is binding and none of the parties served can subsequently contest the will.

The most common challenges to a will's validity include (1) lack of testamentary capacity; (2) undue influence; and (3) fraud. To prove that a person who signed the will (known as a "testator") lacked the capacity to execute the will, the caveator must prove that the testator did not know who her heirs would be if she did not have a will, did not understand the nature and extent of her property, did not understand the nature of signing a will; and did not realize the effect signing a will would have upon her estate. Generally speaking, a mere showing of poor physical health or mental decline is not enough to show a lack of testamentary capacity. The fact that the testator showed some signs of dementia prior to or shortly after the execution of the will is also not enough, standing alone, to show a lack of testamentary capacity.

In order to void a will on the basis of undue influence, a caveator must prove that at the time the will was signed, the testator was under coercion or influence which caused her to leave her property in a way she would not have otherwise done. Factors considered by our Courts when determining whether undue influence occurred include: (a) old age and physical and mental weakness; (b) whether the testator lived in the home of the person accused of undue influence and was subject to his constant association and supervision; (c) whether others had little or no opportunity to see the testator; (d) whether the will is different from and revokes a prior will; (e) whether the will was made in favor of someone with whom there is no blood kinship; (f) whether the will disinherited the testator's direct family members; and (g) whether the person accused of undue influence is the one responsible for getting the will signed.  No single factor is necessarily required or sufficient to establish undue influence.  Instead, all of these factors are subject to consideration in determining if undue influence was present.

Fraud is the least common of the grounds to challenge a will's validity. Claims for fraud usually arise when a third party convinces the testator to sign a will by telling her that the document is something other than a will, such as a release form at the hospital.

Once a caveat proceeding is brought, the case eventually will be set for a jury trial in superior court. After all evidence and testimony are heard, the jury renders a verdict either in favor or against the caveator. If the caveator wins her challenge, then the estate will pass through a prior valid will or, if there was no prior will, through intestacy. If the caveator loses, then the challenge is dismissed and the will originally admitted to probate dictates how the estate will be distributed.

© 2020 Ward and Smith, P.A.. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume X, Number 192


About this Author

E. Bradley Evans, Ward Smith, Litigation lawyer, mediations, arbitrations, jury trials, and appeals

Brad is one of the firm's Managing Directors.  His experience encompasses various areas of civil litigation in both the federal and state courts.  He has experience in all aspects of civil litigation, including depositions, hearings, mediations, arbitrations, jury trials, and appeals.  Brad advises clients and litigates cases involving all forms of commercial, business, estate, and intellectual property disputes.  He regularly represents contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers in construction litigation in state and federal courts.  He has litigated numerous matters...

Juliana S. Inman Family Law Litigation Attorney Ward and Smith New Bern, NC
Litigation Attorney

Juliana's practice focuses on family law and related commercial or estate litigation. She also assists in public housing authorities work and is associated with matters before the North Carolina Business Court. 

After earning her bachelor's from the University of North Carolina at Wilmington, Juliana earned her J.D. from Wake Forest University School of Law. During law school, served as an editorial staff member for the Wake Forest Journal of Business and Intellectual Property Law. She also received the CALI Excellence Award for the highest grade in Legal Analysis, Writing & Research I.


  • Civil Litigation
  • Family Litigation