December 16, 2018

December 14, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

December 13, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

IRS Finalizes Regulations Allowing Use of Forfeitures to Fund Safe Harbor Contributions, QNECs and QMAC

The Internal Revenue Service recently released final regulations confirming that employers can use plan forfeitures to fund qualified non-elective contributions (QNECs), qualified matching contributions (QMACs) and safe harbor contributions.

As explained in our earlier On the Subject discussing this topic, IRS regulations historically provided that QNECs, QMACs and certain safe harbor contributions had to be 100 percent vested at the time the amounts were contributed to an employer’s plan. The IRS interpreted this requirement to prohibit employers from using forfeitures to fund QNECs, QMACs and certain safe harbor contributions. In particular, according to the IRS, using forfeitures for this purpose was impermissible because contributions allocated to a plan’s forfeiture account were subject to a vesting schedule when the contributions were first made to the plan (as employer matching or profit sharing contributions). Therefore, the IRS took the position that forfeitures could never be used to fund QNECs, QMACs or certain safe harbor contributions even if the forfeitures were fully vested at the time they were ultimately re-allocated to participant accounts as QNECs, QMACs or safe harbor contributions.

In response to numerous comments regarding this requirement, the IRS issued proposed regulations in January, 2017 clarifying that QNECs, QMACs and safe harbor contributions were only required to be fully vested at the time the contributions were allocated to participant accounts, rather than when first contributed to the plan. As a result, employers could use forfeitures to fund QNECs, QMACs and safe harbor contributions.

The final regulations issued late last month confirm the approach outlined in the proposed regulations. Importantly, employers were actually permitted to rely on those proposed immediately. As a result, the final regulations simply confirm that plan sponsors can continue to use forfeitures to fund QNECs, QMACs and safe harbor contributions. Before doing so, however, plan sponsors should review their plan documents carefully to ensure that the plans allow forfeitures to be used for such purposes.

© 2018 McDermott Will & Emery

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Joshua Lerner, McDermott, employment lawyer
Associate

Joshua N. Lerner focuses his practice on a variety of executive compensation, employee benefits, corporate governance and securities matters. He has experience advising public and private companies and individual senior executives on executive compensation and benefits matters in a range of corporate transactions and in a regular advisory role. Joshua also counsels clients on ongoing public company matters, including their Securities Exchange Act of 1934 reports and corporate governance and disclosure compliance, and has experience advising clients on a wide range of equity-based incentive...

1 212 547 5478
Associate

Sarah Engle* is an associate in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Chicago office. She focuses her practice on employee benefits matters.

Sarah counsels clients regarding a variety of employee benefits matters, including the design, drafting and operation of tax-qualified pension and profit sharing plans, health and welfare arrangements, and deferred compensation plans.

She is experienced advising clients on employee benefits design, implementation and transition matters arising in connection with corporate mergers and acquisitions, and advises companies on regulatory compliance with the Internal Revenue Code, ERISA, HIPAA, COBRA, PPACA, and related state and federal laws affecting employee benefit plans.

Sarah also has particular experience helping clients address compliance issues related to the administration of their employee benefit plans and has represented clients in matters before the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Department of Labor (DOL) and Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC).

Sarah received her J.D. in 2010 from University of Pittsburgh School of Law, where she was articles editor for the University of Pittsburgh Law Review. She earned her B.S. in 2007 from Indiana State University.

Sarah is admitted to practice in Pennsylvania.

*Not admitted to practice in Illinois. Supervised by principals of the Firm who are admitted to the Illinois bar.

312 984 2024