May 9, 2021

Volume XI, Number 129

Advertisement

May 07, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 06, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Keeping (Trade) Secrets Amid a Reduction in Force

With the US economy officially in a recession as of June and business closures continuing due to rising coronavirus infection rates, more companies may need to conduct layoffs in the coming months. Although discharging employees who have worked with the company’s confidential information can increase a company’s exposure to trade secret theft, advance planning can help companies head off many of the risks.

Before announcing any reduction in force, companies should figure out which employees have access to vital trade secrets. Armed with that knowledge, companies can monitor specific employees’ computer activity around the reduction in force and capture a forensic image of a specific employee’s computer if necessary. A document management software program with features indicating who has opened, edited, and closed documents is a valuable tool for tracking activity related to a company’s sensitive information. Setting up a permissions system that only allows select employees to view confidential information is another way to ensure that only employees that need access to confidential and highly valuable information have it, and to further prevent employees from taking secret information before their departure. After the reduction in force, the company can assess its vulnerability to trade secret misuse by conducting an audit to determine what files or information have been changed or copied.

Along with using technology for auditing and traceability, including confidentiality provisions in severance agreements can further support a misappropriation of trade secrets claim if a company needs to file a case in court.

Taking a close look at who knows what and what they’re doing with the information and carefully crafting severance agreements can help companies keep critical secrets in-house when they need to cut staff.

Advertisement
©1994-2021 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume X, Number 230
Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Adam Samansky IP Attorney Mintz Law Firm
Member

Adam is an experienced IP litigator who primarily serves pharmaceutical, medical, high tech, and defense industry clients. He handles patent, trademark, and trade secret matters for innovators and investors. Adam has a strong record of success in multiparty, highly contested Hatch-Waxman litigation, in addition to other litigations involving advanced biochemistry, polymers, optics, manufacturing processes, and electronics. He has tried cases before multiple US district courts, briefed and argued cases before the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and briefed bet-the-company...

617-348-1819
Nicholas W. Armington, mintz levin law firm, patent, IP, litigation attorney
Associate

Nicholas is a litigator with experience representing clients in United States District Courts and the International Trade Commission, among other venues. Nicholas’ practice focuses on patent and trade secret litigation and he has litigated cases in a variety of technology areas, including network devices, semiconductors, converged devices, LED lighting, and manufacturing devices.

In 2018-2019, Nicholas served as a Special Assistant District Attorney in the Middlesex County District Attorney’s Office prosecuting criminal cases in the Framingham and Natick District...

1.617.348.4451
Advertisement
Advertisement