August 8, 2020

Volume X, Number 221

August 07, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 06, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 05, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Key Developments in US Sanctions

Global supply chains have been greatly disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, sending companies scrambling to find both new sources of supplies and new customers for their products. But even as businesses struggle to find their footing in this new international marketplace, they also must be aware of US sanctions. Aggressive enforcement of US sanctions programs continues, even in the COVID-19 environment, and companies face increasing pressure to perform robust due diligence on their counterparties to reduce the risks of sanctions non-compliance. 

US Sanctions Programs

  • Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) oversees and enforces economic/trade sanctions

  • Sanctions can be comprehensive or selective, based on policy & security goals

  • Secondary sanctions target non-US persons

Sanction Parties Lists & Responsible Agency

  • Denied Persons List (Bureau of Industry and Security)

  • Entry List (Bureau of Industry and Security)

  • Debarred Persons List (Directorate of Defense Trade Controls)

  • Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (OFAC)

Takeaways for 2019/Trends for 2020

  • Stronger existing sanctions against Venezuela, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia

  • More aggressive enforcement

  • Expansive view of US jurisdiction over activities of non-US persons (including non-US subsidiaries, affiliates & portfolio companies)

  • Authorizing DOC to block transactions involving information/communications technology (ex. Huawai)

  • Greater clarity around OFAC’s compliance program expectations and Department of Justice treatment of corporate voluntary self-disclosures

Risk Factors for Enforcement Action

  • Responsibility for foreign affiliates’ actions

  • Ignoring red flags

  • Humanitarian assistance to sanctioned countries

DOJ Self-Disclosure Policy for Willful Violations

  • If party self-reports and cooperates, presumption is party won’t be prosecuted or fined, unless aggravating factors are present.

  • Such factors include transactions involving sensitive items or end-users that are of heightened concern; repeated violations; involvement of senior management; significant profit

  • Self-disclosure to other agencies will not qualify unless independently disclosed to the DOJ’s National Security Division

Best Practices

  • Have a comprehensive compliance policy/program, including ongoing risk assessments

  • Consider OFAC 50% rule in conducting due diligence. Sanctions apply to entities owned 50% or more by Specially Designated Nationals (SDNs)—either directly or indirectly

  • Become a reliable business advisor and partner. Understand the risk areas and the key reasons behind sanction programs

2019 OFAC Compliance Guidance: A Risk Based Approach

Management & Resources

  • Direct reporting lines to management

  • Periodic meetings with management-high risk cases

  • Human capital, expertise, technology

Effective Compliance Program & Controls

  • Onboarding: customers, intermediaries, supply chain, subs, target companies

  • Sanctions screening and desktop research

  • Enhanced due diligence – high risk

  • Transactional review

Ongoing Training & Monitoring

  • Communicate policies to employees

  • Automated monitoring system

  • Analyst review

  • Annual review – high risk cases

Policy Audit & Updates

  • Identify deficiencies

  • Remediate weaknesses

  • Sanctions advisories

  • Training functional groups on new methodologies

“The Brief” provides Compliance and Ethics Network members with a brief overview of highlights and key points covered in the monthly Legal Quick Hit. The full recording of this presentation can be found on the ACC website.

Copyright © 2020 Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume X, Number 197

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

James Kearney, Government Contracting Attorney, Womble Carlyle Law FIrm
Partner

Mr. Kearney represents clients in matters involving government contracting, cross-border regulatory compliance, internal investigations, and enforcement proceedings. His practice focuses on helping clients assess and manage the unique regulatory risks involved in contracting with government entities, entering into federal grant and other funding agreements, and with managing cross-border transactions and global supply chains. He is a member of the Firm’s Government Contracts Group, Global Practice Group, and Supply Chain Initiative. Mr. Kearney represents regulated...

703-394-2214