December 9, 2021

Volume XI, Number 343

Advertisement
Advertisement

December 08, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

December 07, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

December 06, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Legal Implications of Facebook Hearing for Whistleblowers & Employers – Privacy Issues on Many Levels

On Sunday, October 3rd, Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen publicly revealed her identity on the CBS television show 60 Minutes. Formerly a member of Facebook’s civic misinformation team, she previously reported them to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for a variety of concerning business practices, including lying to investors and amplifying the January 6th Capitol Hill attack via Facebook’s platform.

Like all instances of whistleblowing, Ms. Haugen’s actions have a considerable array of legal implications -- not only for Facebook, but for the technology sectors and for labor practices in general. Especially notable is the fact that Ms. Haugen reportedly signed a confidentiality agreement or sometimes call a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) with Facebook, which may complicate the legal process.

What are the Legal Implications of Breaking a Non-Disclosure Agreement?

After secretly copying thousands of internal documents and memos detailing these practices, Ms. Haugen left Facebook in May, and testified before a Senate subcommittee on October 5th.  By revealing information from the documents she took, Facebook could take legal action against Ms. Haugen if they accuse her of stealing confidential information from them. Ms. Haugen’s actions raise questions of the enforceability of non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements when it comes to filing whistleblower complaints.

“Paradoxically, Big Tech’s attack on whistleblower-insiders is often aimed at the whistleblower’s disclosure of so-called confidential inside information of the company.  Yet, the very concerns expressed by the Facebook whistleblower and others inside Big Tech go to the heart of these same allegations—violations of privacy of the consuming public whose own personal data has been used in a way that puts a target on their backs,” said Renée Brooker, a partner with Tycko & Zavareei LLP, a law firm specializing in representing whistleblowers.

Since Ms. Haugen came forward, Facebook stated they will not be retaliating against her for testifying before Congress. It is unclear whether protections from legal action extend to other former employees, as is the case with Ms. Haugen.

Other employees like Frances Haugen with information about corporate or governmental misconduct should know that they do not have to quit their jobs to be protected. There are over 100 federal laws that protect whistleblowers – each with its own focus on a particular industry, or a particular whistleblower issue,” said Richard R. Renner of Kalijarvi, Chuzi, Newman & Fitch, PC, a long-time employment lawyer.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Ms. Haugen’s confidentiality agreement permits her to disclose information to regulators, but not to share proprietary information. A tricky balancing act to navigate.

“Big Tech’s attempt to silence whistleblowers are antithetical to the principles that underlie federal laws and federal whistleblower programs that seek to ferret out illegal activity,” Ms. Brooker said. “Those reporting laws include federal and state False Claims Acts, and the SEC Whistleblower Program, which typically feature whistleblower rewards and anti-retaliation provisions.”

Legal Implications for Facebook & Whistleblowers

Large tech organizations like Facebook have an overarching influence on digital information and how it is shared with the public. Whistleblowers like Ms. Haugen expose potential information about how companies accused of harmful practices act against their own consumers, but also risk disclosing proprietary business information which may or may not be harmful to consumers.

Some of the most significant concerns Haugen expressed to Congress were the tip of the iceberg according to those familiar with whistleblowing reports on Big Tech. Aside from the burden of proof required for such releases to Congress, the threats of employer retaliation and legal repercussions may prevent internal concerns from coming to light.

“Facebook should not be singled out as a lone actor. Big Tech needs to be held accountable and insiders can and should be encouraged to come forward and be prepared to back up their allegations with hard evidence sufficient to allow governments to conduct appropriate investigations,’ Ms. Brooker said.

As the concern for cybersecurity and data protection continues to hold public interest, more whistleblower disclosures against Big Tech and other companies could hold them accountable are coming to light.

During Haugen’s testimony during  the October 5, 2021 Congressional hearing revealed a possible expanding definition of media regulation versus consumer censorship. Although these allegations were the latest against a large company such as Facebook, more whistleblowers may continue to come forward with similar accusations, bringing additional implications for privacy, employment law and whistleblower protections.

“The Facebook whistleblower’s revelations have opened the door just a crack on how Big Tech is exploiting American consumers,” Ms. Brooker said.

Read more on the trade secret implications of Frances Haugen's testimony here.

Read more on the privacy implications of her testimony here.

Copyright ©2021 National Law Forum, LLCNational Law Review, Volume XI, Number 279
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Rachel Popa National Law Review Editorial Manager
Editorial Manager

Rachel Popa is an Editorial Manager  for the National Law Review. In her role with the NLR, Rachel edits and manages client content, authors original thought leadership articles for the publication, and manages the production of the NLR's new legal news podcast, Legal News Reach.  Additionally,  this past year, Rachel spoke about how to launch a successful law firm podcast in a webinar with McDougall Interactive.

Prior to joining the NLR, Rachel was a reporter for Becker's Healthcare in Chicago, where she covered the ambulatory surgery beat and authored custom content for...

708-357-3317 ext 705
Jessica Scheck NLR National Law Review Web Content Specialist Editorial Team
Web Content Specialist

Jessica Scheck is a Web Content Specialist for the National Law Review, and authors original thought leadership articles, and manages the production of the NLR's new legal news podcast Legal News Reach. Prior to joining the NLR, Jessica spent more than five years in the legal industry as a Virginia Circuit courtroom clerk and a paralegal in Virginia and North Carolina. Prior to her years as a legal professional, she worked in communications as a writer, copy-editor, social media...

708-357-3317 ext. 709
Chandler Ford Web Content Specialist National Law Review Legal News
Web Content Specialist

Chandler Ford is a Web Content Specialist for the National Law Review. Prior to joining the NLR, Chandler worked as a legal writer and team leader at Hudson, a corporate immigration law firm in Chicago, where he specialized in I-140 and I-129 case preparation. He also has experience in copy editing, proofreading, and journalism.

He graduated with a B.A. in English and Communication from Boston College in Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts. Currently, he is also pursuing an M.F.A. in Writing from Bennington College in Bennington, Vermont. Outside of work, Chandler spends his time...

708-357-3317
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement