September 23, 2020

Volume X, Number 267

September 23, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 22, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 21, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Letters of Intent in Construction Industry: The How, Why and Why Not of Enforceability

A common form of agreement in the construction industry is the letter of intent. A letter of intent is essentially an agreement to agree. The parties are agreeing that they will work together on a project and work out the details later. But what happens when the parties fail to work out the details later?

If everything goes smoothly, there often isn’t a problem. But things don’t always go smoothly. What happens when a problem occurs before the contract is finalized? Is there an enforceable contract? And, if so, what are the terms of that contract?

Luckily, Illinois law does provide guidance for these types of situations. In fact, the Illinois Supreme Court, in Quake Const. Inc., v. American Airlines, Inc., 141 Ill. 2d 281, 289 (1990), outlined several factors used to determine whether a letter of intent will be binding:

1) Whether the agreement is of a type usually put into writing

2) The amount of detail in the agreement

3) The amount of money involved

4) Whether a formal writing is required

5) Whether the parties contemplated a formal written document at the end of negotiations

Establishing Enforceability — or Not — of a Letter of Intent

If the factors outlined by the Illinois Supreme Court apply to your case, you may be able to enforce a letter of intent. For the letter of intent to be enforceable, it must include all the “material terms” of the agreement, such as the parties to the agreement, the price, the work to be done and the date the work is to be completed. If the letter of intent does contain sufficient detail, then the terms of the contract are outlined by letter of intent itself.

In other situations, you may only want a letter of intent to serve as a starting point for further discussion. Because the letter of intent is typically not intended to be a formal agreement, it is important to know how to ensure that it does not become a binding contract. One way to achieve that goal is to specifically provide in the letter of intent that the negotiations are not binding unless and until a formal contract is actually executed. The Illinois Supreme Court has indicated that such a clause can ensure that a letter of intent is non-binding and intended simply for purposes of negotiation.

© 2020 Much Shelist, P.C.National Law Review, Volume VII, Number 38


About this Author

Tower cranes are back on skylines as the construction industry emerges from challenging times. This emergence is sector-driven and success often depends on consolidation, innovation and a renewed dedication to productivity. Careful attention must be paid to risks, old and new.  More than ever, owners, contractors and design professionals need counsel who understand their challenges.  At Much Shelist, we know our clients’ businesses and we understand the risks they can face.  We care deeply about our clients, and we admire their dedication to design and construction.  A...

Shawn M Staples, Principal, Much Shelist Law Firm

Shawn Staples focuses his practice on complex commercial litigation, appellate litigation, and defense of professional malpractice claims. Shawn has extensive experience inside and outside of the courtroom. He has conducted trials in state and federal court and has assisted in appeals before the Illinois Supreme Court. Shawn has conducted depositions, resolved cases during mediation and pre-trial settlement conferences, and successfully argued many contested motion hearings. Shawn also has experience in successfully arguing and defending hearings for temporary restraining orders and injunctive relief for his business clientele.

Shawn has assisted the firm’s banking clients in a variety of matters by representing the FDIC, banks, mortgage lenders, and servicers in fraud claims and commercial real estate foreclosures. Shawn has also represented financial institutions and business in prosecuting and defending claims under the Uniform Commercial Code.

Shawn is admitted to practice in Illinois and before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (including the Trial Bar).