August 8, 2020

Volume X, Number 221

August 07, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 06, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 05, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Methane Rule Update—Industry and Environmental Groups Seek Reconsideration

As we previously wrote on this blog, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency finalized New Source Performance Standards for methane emissions from the oil and gas industry on June 3, 2016. Both industry and environmental groups later submitted petitions for reconsideration of certain aspects of these New Source Performance Standards (the Methane Rule), which are now pending for consideration by the EPA Administrator. An additional round of notice and comment will be held for any provisions of the Methane Rule that the Administrator agrees to reconsider. The denial of a petition for reconsideration, in whole or in part, may be appealed directly to the relevant federal appellate circuit.

The American Petroleum Institute and the Texas Oil & Gas Association each filed petitions on August 2, 2016, requesting that EPA revisit a number of the Methane Rule’s technological emissions reductions requirements. Perhaps most significantly, the industry petitions challenge the rule’s requirement that licensed professional engineers certify certain emissions control systems, the definition of the terms “brownfield” and “greenfield” as used in the rule, and the steps operators must take before routing emissions from well completion activities to combustion devices. The American Petroleum Institute’s petition also included a list of 17 additional recommended changes to the Methane Rule for which the group was not seeking formal reconsideration.

While the industry groups’ petitions addressed narrow technical requirements of the Methane Rule, the environmental groups challenged several broad, foundational elements. First, the environmental groups challenged EPA’s requirement that producers use low-bleed pneumatic controllers, arguing that no-bleed controllers are available and appropriate. They also urged EPA to reconsider its decision to forgo emission standards for oil and gas storage vessels and to shorten the time allowed for repair of methane leaks. Finally, the environmental groups’ petition asked EPA to revisit its decision to adopt rules only for new sources, arguing that emissions rules for existing sources in the oil and gas industry are overdue.

© 2020 Schiff Hardin LLPNational Law Review, Volume VI, Number 292

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Ryan Granholm Litigation Attorney Schiff Hardin
Associate

Ryan C. Granholm assists clients with complex compliance and litigation matters involving local, state, and federal environmental rules. He regularly advocates for his clients in a variety of different jurisdictions and venues, from county circuit court, to state administrative agencies, to federal district and appellate courts.

Ryan believes the best lawyers are flexible. He tailors his approach to his clients’ needs and goals—from answering pressing compliance questions to crafting long-term litigation strategies. Employing technical, legal, and negotiation-based approaches, Ryan...

312-258-5633