January 17, 2022

Volume XII, Number 17

Advertisement
Advertisement

January 15, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 14, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Miller Act Suit Stayed until CDA Remedies Exhausted

A federal district court in Washington recently rejected a subcontractor’s motion for reconsideration of a previously granted motion to stay in a Miller Act lawsuit (the Miller Act governs prime contractor bond requirements on federal projects and sets forth remedies against the bond for subcontractors, vendors, and suppliers on such projects). In United States of America, for the use and benefit of Ballard Marine Construction, LLC, v. Nova Group Inc., et al., the prime contractor, Nova Group, moved to stay Ballard Marine’s Miller Act lawsuit until Ballard Marine and Nova Group exhausted the Contract Disputes Act (CDA) resolution process.

The parties’ subcontract required Ballard Marine to await resolution of the CDA process and a determination by the government of the amount to which Ballard Marine and Nova Group may be entitled before pursuing Nova Group or its sureties separately. The district court granted Nova Group’s motion, and Ballard Marine moved for reconsideration and clarification as to whether the stay extended through the contracting officer’s final decision or through the exhaustion of the CDA appeals process.

Ballard Marine argued that the latter view of the stay was unfair because the appeals process could take years to fully resolve, and it was more appropriate to extend the stay only until the Navy’s contracting officer issued its final decision on Ballard Marine’s claim. Nova Group countered by arguing that the report and recommendation granting the motion to stay was already clear that the stay extended through the CDA appeals process.

Further, Nova Group argued that until the CDA appeals process was exhausted, no determination could be made as to the amount due under the subcontract. Nova Group persuasively argued that the Miller Act was not intended to “bypass the [CDA] process under which monetary entitlement is quantified.” According to Nova Group, the government’s determination of entitlement was a prerequisite to Ballard Marine’s pursuit of any claims. Nova Group also offered evidence that it had been pursuing Ballard Marine’s claim diligently and disputed the assertion that the CDA appeals process would take many years to resolve. The district court agreed with Nova Group and denied the motion for reconsideration.

Lessons from Ballard Marine Construction

Contractors and subcontractors should be cognizant of the dispute requirements in their subcontracts. Subcontracts on federal projects often contain clauses incorporating prime contract requirements or provisions requiring adherence to and exhaustion of the CDA process prior to pursuit of a prime contractor on pass-through claims. These provisions should feature prominently in internal company assessments about recovery options/exposure and potential litigation timelines.

© 2022 Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLPNational Law Review, Volume XI, Number 342
Advertisement

About this Author

Douglas L. Patin Construction Litigation Attorney Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Washington DC
Partner

Doug Patin has an extensive government contracts and construction litigation practice. While this work has involved the entire spectrum of traditional government contract disputes, he has developed extensive experience in various aspects of government and construction contract law including: claims, appeals, bid protests, international arbitration, insurance coverage, federal fraud and False Claims Act issues.

Doug's extensive teaching and writing efforts keep him current on changing case law and developments in the field, including the...

202-719-8241
Aron C. Beezley Government Contracts Attorney Bradley D.C.
Partner

Aron Beezley is the co-leader of Bradley’s Government Contracts Practice Group. Ranked nationally in Government Contracts Law by Chambers in 2019-2021, named one of the “Top Attorneys Under 40” nationwide in Government Contracts Law by Law360 in 2016-2017, and listed in Washington, D.C. Super Lawyers as a “Rising Star” in Government Contracts Law in 2014-2021, Aron’s vast experience includes representation of government contractors in numerous industries and in all aspects of the government-contracting process, including negotiation, award,...

202-719-8254
Aman Kahlon Construction Attorney Bradley
Partner

Aman Kahlon represents owners, general contractors, and subcontractors in his construction and government contracts practice. His litigation experience covers a wide variety of disputes, including substantial experience in power and energy matters. He advises clients on delay, interference, defective design and negligence claims. Representative actions include:

  • A $60 million breach of contract dispute between a subcontractor and general contractor involving the construction of a power plant in Colorado

  • ...
205.521.8134
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement