October 28, 2021

Volume XI, Number 301

Advertisement
Advertisement

October 27, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 26, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 25, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

Mitigating the Impact of the 280G Golden Parachute Rules

Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (“280G”) (i) denies a corporate deduction for federal income tax purposes and (ii) imposes a 20% excise tax on the “disqualified individual” (e.g., officer) (a “DI”), if the value of the compensation and benefits (the “connected compensation”) received by a DI in connection with a change in control equals or exceeds three times the DI’s “base amount” (such three times of the base amount, the “280G Threshold”). The deduction is denied with respect to, and the 20% excise tax is imposed on, the amount of the connected compensation that exceeds one times the “base amount” (generally the DI’s average compensation over the five years prior to the change in control).

Business Point

Techniques exist to mitigate the impact of 280G.

Technical Points

280G mitigation techniques include:

  • Straight cutback – compensation that equals or exceeds the 280G Threshold is automatically forfeited. No 280G consequences.

  • “Better-off” cutback – the DI retains the greater, on an after-tax basis, of the amount resulting from (i) payment of the full amount (taking into account the 20% excise tax) and (ii) application of a straight cutback.

  • Full gross-up – the corporation pays the DI a gross-up payment sufficient to place him or her in the same after-tax position as if the 20% excise tax had not applied.1 Note that such a gross-up costs more than just the 20% excise tax because the gross-up payment is also subject income taxation (and, because it is connected compensation, also the 20% excise tax). Loss of deduction and the 20% excise tax will apply. 

  • Modified gross-up – the full gross-up, described above, applies only if the connected compensation exceeds the 280G Threshold by a particular amount (e.g., 110%), otherwise a straight cutback is applied.

  • Reasonable compensation – payments established by clear and convincing evidence as reasonable compensation for services on or after the change in control (including refraining from performing services under a non-competition agreement) are exempt from 280G.

  • Increase compensation in year preceding transaction – a DI or the corporation may take actions to increase the base amount in the year(s) before a potential transaction (e.g., exercise vested options or pay bonuses earlier than usual), which will increase the base amount, thus reducing the chances of exceeding the 280G Threshold (or at least reducing the excess).

  • Private corporation shareholder vote – if all material facts concerning the connected compensation are disclosed to all shareholders of a private corporation and 75% of the voting power of the outstanding stock approves the payments in a separate vote, 280G will not apply. DIs must, prior to the vote, irrevocably waive all rights to the connected compensation above the 280G Threshold if the vote fails.


1. Note that shareholder advisory services such as ISS considered 280G gross-ups to be problematic pay practices.

Copyright © 2021, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume VII, Number 271
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

 Matthew B. Grunert, Andrews Kurth Kenyon Law Firm, Employee Benefits Implementation Attorney
Partner

Matt's practice focuses on tax matters with an emphasis on employee benefits. Matt works with clients in the design, implementation, maintenance and termination of defined contribution plans, defined benefits plan, health and welfare plans and executive compensation plans. He also has experience with the employee benefits aspects of mergers, acquisitions, dispositions and spin-offs.

Matt represents clients on benefits-related matters before the Internal Revenue Service, the Department of Labor and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. He...

713.220.4429
Emily Cabrera, Andrews Kurth Law Firm, The Woodlands, Corporate Law Attorney
Associate

Emily's legal practice focuses on executive compensation and employee benefit arrangements (including their related tax, accounting, securities and corporate governance issues).

Representative Experience

Corporate Representation: Advises private and publicly-traded clients and their boards of directors on compensation and benefits matters, including:

  • Drafting and maintaining equity. phantom equity and cash bonus plans

  • Drafting CD...

713-220-4278
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement