February 1, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 32


January 31, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 30, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Nevada Begins 81st Legislative Session With Proposal For Significant Corporate Law Changes

On Monday, the Nevada legislature commenced its 81st session.   The legislature meets biennially in odd numbered years.  The Session is limited to 120 days.  Nev. Const. Art. 4, § 2.  Yesterday, Senator James Ohrenschall introduced SB 95 which would make numerous significant changes to Nevada's private corporation law.  

Among other things, SB 95 would amend NRS 78.046 to permit a Nevada corporation's articles or bylaws to require that "concurrent jurisdiction actions" be brought solely or exclusively in the court(s) specified in the articles or bylaws.  The bill defines "concurrent jurisdiction action" as any action, suit or proceeding against the corporation or any of its directors or officers, that:

  • Asserts a cause of action under the laws of the United States;

  • Could be properly commenced in either a federal forum or a forum of this State or any other state; and

  • Is brought by or in the name or on behalf of:

    • The corporation;

    • Any stockholder of the corporation; or

    • Any subscriber for, or purchaser or offeree of, any shares or other securities of the corporation.

If this seems less than pellucid, it apparently is an attempt to allow the articles or bylaws to require that actions brought under the Securities Act of 1933 to be brought exclusively in the federal courts.  The Securities Act provides for concurrent jurisdiction of the federal and state courts, but this was brought into question following the enactment of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act.  In 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that a class action alleging only violations of the federal Securities Act of 1933 could be brought in either state or federal court.  Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver Cty. Emples. Ret. Fund, 138 S. Ct. 1061 (2018).  See Cyan And The California Company.

© 2010-2023 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 35

About this Author

Keith Paul Bishop, Corporate Transactions Lawyer, finance securities attorney, Allen Matkins Law Firm

Keith Bishop works with privately held and publicly traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California.

While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of...