September 17, 2021

Volume XI, Number 260

Advertisement

September 16, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 15, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 14, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

A New Commodity in a Traditional Box: Hemp's Commodity Status Demands Appropriate Attention

The United States government federally decriminalized hemp on December 20, 2018, making hemp biomass—the raw, harvested agricultural plant—a commodity like any other crop such as corn, wheat, or soybeans.  The transition of hemp from an unlawful item to a traditional agricultural commodity is critical, as commodities are considered "goods" under the default commercial laws of many states, including North Carolina. 

The treatment of hemp as a "good" triggers a legal structure that those in the business of buying and selling hemp biomass ignore at their own peril.

Goods v. Services

In the United States, there are typically two forms of law: common law, which is made up of traditional legal concepts that are recognized and applied by the courts, and statutory law, which is comprised of codified laws enacted by a legislative body. 

In broad strokes, contracts for services, such as accounting, freight, or construction, are governed by common law.  Conversely, contracts for the sale of goods, such as vehicles, consumer products, and such are governed by statutes.  As have most states, North Carolina has adopted a version of the Uniform Commercial Code ("UCC").  The UCC is a statutory scheme that provides a default structure for many types of commercial transactions, including, most relevantly here, the sale of goods.

Legally speaking, what is a "good"?  North Carolina's version of the UCC defines "goods" as "all things…which are movable at the time of identification to the contract for sale other than the money in which the price is to be paid… [and] also includes the unborn young of animals and growing crops."  Like other agricultural commodities, hemp biomass falls under this definition.  As a result, North Carolina's UCC—including all of its default rules—applies to the sale of hemp biomass.

Beware the Default Rules

The default rules contained in North Carolina's version of the UCC cover everything from contract formation requirements to special definitions for common sales terms to remedies available to disgruntled buyers and sellers.  This article focuses on a single example to illustrate the importance of sellers and buyers being aware of and prepared to contract around the default rules or risk the consequences of their application. 

By default under North Carolina's UCC, a seller impliedly warrants that the goods will be fit for the particular purpose for which they are being sold.  This warranty exists whenever there is a sale of goods unless and until it is modified or disclaimed in writing in a specific way detailed in the statutes.  This means that if there is a problem with the hemp biomass and the seller did not modify or properly disclaim the warranty, the disgruntled buyer may have an action for damages based on the sellers' breach of the warranty.  Understanding this default rule and how to avoid its application is critical for sellers, while understanding this rule and how to enforce it is critical for buyers.  This example is one of many of how North Carolina's UCC can impact the sale and purchase of hemp biomass. 

Conclusion

Like with any commercial transaction, risk management is key when selling and buying hemp biomass.  A solid step for hemp biomass sellers and buyers towards effectively managing their respective risks is to have an appreciation and understanding of the reach and impact of North Carolina's UCC on the sale and purchase of hemp biomass and how that understanding should shape the contracts they enter.

© 2021 Ward and Smith, P.A.. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 196
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Allen N. Trask III, Litigation Attorney, Ward Smith, Wilmington, North Carolina, business, civil, commercial litigation
Litigation Attorney

Allen focuses his practice on assisting those who own, manage, and invest in real estate and common interest communities.  He regularly works with real estate developers and the residential and commercial community associations that they create to handle all manner of issues, including the preparation, amendment, interpretation, and enforcement of restrictive covenants and governing corporate documents, declarant control transition and disputes, community management, insurance claims and disputes, and collections.  He also frequently represents Real Estate Investment...

910-794-4804
Amy H. Wooten Construction Litigation Attorney Ward and Smith Raleigh, NC
Litigation Attorney

Amy Wooten has a wealth of experience in a wide range of substantive areas. She litigates complex commercial litigation cases; construction disputes; community association matters, and disagreements arising in the HOA context; professional licensing defense; and employment litigation. She represents clients in a broad range of commercial matters, such as breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and unfair and deceptive trade practices claims. 

Amy also has significant experience representing industry professionals and contractors in construction defect disputes in state and...

919.277.9130
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement