March 27, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 86


March 24, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

The New Hart-Scott-Rodino Filing Thresholds: The FTC and Congress Join Forces to Further President Biden’s Antitrust Agenda

On January 23, 2023, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) enacted the most radical change to Hart-Scott-Rodino Act (HSR) filing thresholds in decades. Pursuant to the Merger Filing Fee Modernization Act of 2022, which was signed into law as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act on December 29, 2022, the new HSR filing fees are determined using a tiered system that decreases the financial burden on smaller businesses combining that are trying to establish a presence in the market and imposes a “tax” in the form of significantly higher fees on larger companies. The new structure is consistent with other antitrust legislative efforts to rein in Big Tech that have been percolating in Congress for years.

When Does a Transaction Trigger an HSR Filing?

Not all mergers and acquisitions require pre-merger notification to government agencies under the HSR Act; there is a three-prong test to determine whether a filing is necessary.  

1.     Commerce Test: Determine whether either party is engaged in commerce or an activity affecting commerce.

2.     Size-of-Transaction Test: As described below, if a transaction is below a certain value, the parties do not need to make an HSR filing. If the transaction is above a certain a value, an HSR filing is automatically required.

3.     Size-of-Person Test: Transactions between these lower and upper thresholds require an HSR filing depending on the size-of-person test. Specifically, if the Ultimate Parent Entity (UPE) of the buyer or seller, defined as the entity, has a certain amount of annual net sales or total assets, then the transaction is reportable.

New Filing Thresholds and Fees

The new filing thresholds and fees which take effect on February 27, 2023, are as follows:

The FTC Picks Up the Congressional Mantle

For years, Congress has considered legislation to “update” the Sherman Act so that, from the vantage point of the legislators sponsoring the bills, federal antitrust law is better equipped to deal with the challenges in modern markets. Among the bills in play were the Competition and Antitrust Law Enforcement Reform Act (S. 225) (CALERA), sponsored by Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), that sought to increase agency enforcement resources and curtail monopoly power. To date, sweeping overhauls like CALERA have stalled in Congress because bill sponsors are unable to attract the necessary support. Passing the Merger Filing Fee Modernization Act is a small but significant victory. First, the tiered-fee structure favors nascent competitors that are trying to gain a foothold in the market to take on bigger rivals, while “taxing” bigger companies allegedly seeking to further consolidate market power. Second, the FTC is expected to invest the hefty HSR filing fees back into the agency—essentially leveraging big transactions to increase its own enforcement capabilities.

Copyright © 2023 Robinson & Cole LLP. All rights reserved.National Law Review, Volume XIII, Number 30

About this Author

Jennifer Driscoll Litigation and Mergers Attorney

Jennifer Driscoll focuses her practice on investigations, litigation, arbitration, mergers, and counseling. Jen has extensive experience in the medical devices, pharmaceutical, electronic components and automotive industries, with a particular knowledge of industries in Japan and Taiwan. She is a member of the firm’s Business Litigation Group.

An experienced commercial litigator, Jen defends corporations and individuals against alleged antitrust and anti-corruption claims, both civil and criminal. Her recent cases, which include cartel matters,...