July 10, 2020

Volume X, Number 192

July 09, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 08, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 07, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

New Partnership Audit Regime Set to Take Effect in 2018, Proactive Planning Recommended

On November 2, 2015, Congress passed the new centralized partnership audit regime as part of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA) which is set to take effect for the tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018. The intent and purpose of the new regime is to allow the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to more effectively and efficiently audit partnerships by (1) allowing the IRS to collect from the partnership any partnership tax adjustment; and (2) requiring the appointment of a “partnership representative” to act as the point-person and binding decision maker with respect to any IRS audit procedures and related matters.


The BBA rules generally apply to all entities taxable as partnerships unless the partnership is eligible to elect to “opt-out” of the new regime. It is anticipated that the opt-out election will be available only in very limited circumstances because only partnerships with 100 or fewer partners, and whose partners consist only of eligible partners, may elect to opt-out of these rules. For this purpose, the term “eligible partners” includes individuals, C corporations, certain foreign entities, S corporations, and estates of deceased partners; but, according to the proposed regulations, does not include single-member LLCs (even though the sole member of the LLC is the K-1 partner) or trusts (whether complex or grantor trusts).

Under the current rules, the IRS collects partnership tax assessments at the partner level. The BBA regime changes this. The partnership itself will be required to pay any tax assessment, unless the partnership makes an election to “push-out” the assessed liability (including penalties) to the individual partners. Without a push-out election, the BBA rules effectively require the tax liability of the audited tax year to be borne by those that are partners during the year of audit (regardless whether they were partners during the audited year). This is a departure from current law pursuant to which any partnership adjustment is imposed on the partners of the audited year. The push-out election allows the partnership to cause those that were partners in the audited year to bear the tax adjustment. The eligibility for and consequences of making the push-out election should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

The BBA also eliminates the current position of the “tax matters partner”, instead opting for a “partnership representative” to act with a broader role on behalf of the partnership. In addition, the concept of other partners having the right to receive “notice” of and to participate in the audit has been eliminated. The partnership representative will now be the only person representing the partnership without any notice or participatory rights required to be given to any non-representative partner. Vis-à-vis the IRS, the partnership representative has the sole authority to act on behalf of the partnership during an IRS audit or other tax proceedings involving any partnership item and can bind the partnership and its partners. If a partnership fails to appoint a partnership representative, the IRS may choose one for it. Proposed IRS regulations provide that the partnership representative can bind the partnership and its partners, even if it exceeds the power granted to him, her or it in the partnership agreement. Partnerships need to consider whom to appoint as their representative (which does not have to be a partner in the partnership but must be a person or entity with a US presence) and the contractual limitations and obligations they would want to impose on their representative.

Next Steps

The new regime is complex and will affect virtually all partnerships. In order to prepare for the new regime, partnership agreements should be reviewed and amended as necessary to deal with some or all of the following provisions, among others, to accommodate the new rules:

  • whom to appoint as the partnership representative and procedures for his, her or its replacement;
  • indemnification provisions for the partnership representative;
  • contractual limitations of power on the partnership representative and/or notice requirements to partners with respect to all IRS (and state income tax) communications;
  • if it is eligible, whether the partnership should make an election to opt-out of the new regime; and
  • the ability of the partnership to request certain information from its partners necessary for the partnership to modify its tax liability.

Given the complexity and broad scope of the rules, each partnership agreement should be reviewed and amended based on the facts and circumstances of the partnership and its partners.

Robert Loewy, Glenn S. Miller and Saul E. Rudo also contributed to this article.

©2020 Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPNational Law Review, Volume VII, Number 220


About this Author

Banoff, Katten, portrait

Sheldon I. Banoff concentrates in federal income taxation with particular focus in investment, real estate, partnership and limited liability company taxation matters. He has represented major real estate developers, syndicators, lenders and investors, including taxable and tax-exempt investors and law, accounting and other professional services firms.

Shelly is also a nationally known author and lecturer. He has been editor of the Journal of Taxation’s monthly "Shop Talk" column since 1985, and has also written more than 200 leading articles in the tax area.

Ciavarella, Katten, portrait

Angelo Ciavarella focuses on advising clients on a wide range of tax matters with particular emphasis on domestic and cross-border corporate transactions, including mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, restructurings, tax-free reorganizations, leveraged buyouts and other major corporate transactions, as well as lending and other financing transactions. In addition, Angelo advises on the formation and operation of partnerships, limited liability companies and investment vehicles (including private equity and hedge funds) and their general partners and advisors, and partnership restructurings, acquisitions and divestitures. Angelo also advises on capital market transactions and financial products, including foreign and domestic stock and securities offerings, forward contracts, options, swaps, and other derivative contracts. Angelo has represented clients in connection with real estate transactions, including advising real estate developers, domestic and foreign real estate investors, real estate investment funds, and REITS.


Jill E. Darrow is head of Katten's New York Tax Planning practice. She concentrates her practice in tax planning and tax law with a focus on partnership transactions, financial services, hedge funds, commodities funds and real estate.

Jill advises clients on all aspects of tax with a concentration in the areas of financial services and real estate. Her practice covers the tax aspects of transactions involving partnerships, limited liability companies, carried interests, subchapter S corporations, regulated investment companies (mutual funds), recording and...

Valentina Famparska, Katten Muchin, management compensation lawyer, real estate investments attorney

Valentina Famparska concentrates her practice in the area of federal income taxation, focusing in private equity-backed investments, management compensation, partnerships, real estate investments, and mergers and acquisitions. She works closely with the firm’s Corporate, Financial Services and Real Estate practices.

Valentina is co-author of the article "Use of Restricted Stock as Equity Incentive Compensation," a Business Tax Article for the May 2004 Illinois Law Issue for President and CEO Magazine. Valentina is also a co-author of the...

Brandon D. Hadley, Katten Muchin Law Firm, Tax Lawyer

Brandon Hadley concentrates his tax practice in debt instruments, financial products, securitization, cross-border investments and tax credit investments. His principal areas of experience include debt capital markets transactions, asset-backed securitization, the structuring of derivatives and hybrid securities, and tax credit investments including tax equity investments in solar projects.

Brandon counsels US and offshore issuers and underwriters in public offerings and private placements of securities. He has provided tax advice for private equity...