February 5, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 36

Error message

  • Warning: Undefined variable $settings in include_once() (line 135 of /var/www/html/docroot/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in include_once() (line 135 of /var/www/html/docroot/sites/default/settings.php).

February 03, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 02, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

New York Fashion Sustainability Act: Now In Committee

The New York Fashion Sustainability and Social Accountability Act (A8352/S7428), if passed, will be the first US law to explicitly place sustainability requirements aimed at large fashion companies. These requirements would apply to fashion retailers and manufacturers that:

  1. do business in New York; and

  2. have global revenues in excess of $100 million USD.

New Obligations Under the Proposed Act

Companies subject to the proposed Act would be required to disclose their environmental and social due diligence policies, processes, and outcomes. Four disclosures are particularly notable.

Supply Chain Mapping. Companies would be required to use good faith efforts to map at least 50% of their supply chains, focusing on suppliers with higher social and environmental risks.

Social and Environmental Sustainability Report. Companies would be required to publish reports describing what they did to identify, prevent, and account for potential adverse impacts. These reports would need to include the below information in alignment with various global principles (including the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human RightsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights At WorkOECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, and OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct).

The reports would also need to include:

  • Links to relevant policies on responsible business conduct;

  • Information on measures taken to embed responsible business conduct into company policies and management systems;

  • Identified areas of risk in the company’s global supply chain;

  • Criteria for how risks are being prioritized;

  • Actions taken to prevent/mitigate risks (citing corrective action plans, where available);

  • Measures to track implementation and results; and

  • The company’s remediation efforts, if any.

Impact Disclosure on Prioritized Adverse Environmental & Social Impacts. Companies would have to make an impact disclosure within 18 months of the Act’s enactment. The impact disclosure would have to include:

  • Quantitative baseline and reduction targets on energy and greenhouse gas emissions;

  • Annual volume of materials produced, including breakdown by material type;

  • Median wages of workers of prioritized suppliers and how this compares with local minimum wages/living wages; and

  • The company’s approach for incentivizing supplier performance with respect to workers’ rights.

Targets Company Has for Impact Reductions. Companies would also be required to provide estimated timelines and benchmarks for improvement in covered areas such as climate change.


Failure to comply with the potential Act, if enacted, could result in penalties brought by the NY Attorney General (AG). These could include injunctions, monetary damages, and/or civil performance of a statutory duty. The current proposal would provide companies a 3 month period to remedy issues identified by the AG. Failure to remedy would result in a fine of up to 2% of annual revenues. The AG would also publish an annual report identifying companies found not to be in compliance with the Act.

Additionally, the current draft of the bill provides a private right of action by any citizen against any person alleged to have violated the Act or related AG orders. It would also allow any citizen to compel the AG to investigate a company’s compliance with the Act.

Current Status & Next Steps

The bill was initially introduced in October of 2021, and is now pending in the Consumer Protection committee. A vote is expected later this spring. Should it pass, fashion retailers and manufacturers should consult with counsel regarding strategies to publish the covered disclosures.

Copyright © 2023, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.National Law Review, Volume XII, Number 119

About this Author

Rachel Hudson, Lawyer, Sheppard Mullin, Intellectual Property Practice Group

Rachel Tarko Hudson is an associate in the Intellectual Property Practice Group in the firm's San Francisco office.

Areas of Practice

Rachel advises clients in the retail, technology, media, and other industries in online and mobile e-commerce transactions and vendor agreements, intellectual property licensing, commercial and development agreements, and other transactional matters. She assists clients in complying with domestic and international privacy laws, clearing advertising campaigns, conducting contests and sweepstakes promotional initiatives, and...

Alyssa Sones, Sheppard Mullin Law Firm, Century City, Cybersecurity and Litigation Attorney

Alyssa M. Sones is an associate in the Business Trial Practice Group. She is the Lead Associate of Sheppard Mullin’s Retail, Fashion & Beauty Industry Team and serves as an Editor for its Retail Trend Spotter blog. Alyssa is also an active member of the firm’s Privacy and Cybersecurity Team and a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP/US).

Areas of Practice

Alyssa excels at helping businesses resolve disputes with customers. She is dedicated to guiding clients through thorny state and...

Dhara Shah Law Clerk Chicago Shephard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Law Clerk

Dhara Shah is an law clerk in the Intellectual Practice Group in the firm’s Chicago office.