April 24, 2018

April 24, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

April 23, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Ninth Circuit Doubles Down on Lack of Standing Under Spokeo in Facta Cases

Recently, the Ninth Circuit held in Bassett v. ABM Parking Services, Inc. that an allegation that a business violated the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”) by printing a credit card expiration date on a customer’s receipt is, by itself, insufficient to establish Article III standing under Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins. (For more information, read K&L Gates alerts on the Bassett decision and FACTA standing jurisprudence.) Now, in Noble v. Nevada Checker Cab Corp., No. 16-16573 (9th Cir. Mar. 9, 2018), the Ninth Circuit reached the same conclusion with respect to an alleged FACTA violation arising out of the printing of the first digit of the card number in addition to the last four digits. In doing so, the Ninth Circuit appears to be sending a strong signal to potential FACTA plaintiffs that something more than a technical violation is necessary to have standing to pursue statutory damages in federal court under FACTA.

FACTA provides that “no person that accepts credit cards or debit cards for the transaction of business shall print more than the last 5 digits of the card number or the expiration date upon any [electronically-printed] receipt provided to the cardholder at the point of the sale or transaction.” 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g). Thus, printing the first digit of a 16-digit card number technically violates the statute. But, the Noble plaintiffs did not allege any other facts that, if proven, would have demonstrated injury, such as that the receipts in question were lost or stolen. Under that circumstance, the Ninth Circuit concluded that Bassett was controlling. It reasoned that “[a]s in Bassett, [the plaintiffs] did not allege that anyone else had received or would receive a copy of their credit card receipts” and that the plaintiffs’ “alleged injury depended entirely on a FACTA violation.” Slip op. at 4. Further, the Court found that the risk the receipts at issue posed was no greater than those in Bassett, because “the first digit of a credit card number merely identifies the brand of the card, and Congress has not prohibited printing the identity of the credit card issuer along with the last five digits of the credit card number.” Id.

In reaching this result, the Ninth Circuit joins the Second Circuit’s view of the issue. Several appeals regarding the issue (or the related issue regarding the printing of expiration dates) remain pending in the Third, Fifth, and Eleventh Circuits.

Copyright 2018 K & L Gates

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Gregory Blace, KL Gates Law Firm, Class Action Litigation Attorney
Partner

Mr. Blase is a partner in the Boston office of K&L Gates where he is a member of the firm's Class Action Litigation Defense group. Mr. Blase has experience in complex commercial litigation, and has represented mortgage lenders, servicers and other financial institutions in class action and individual suits under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Truth in Lending Act, Fair Housing Act, Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and various state unfair and deceptive practices...

617-951-9059
Andrew Glass, KL Gates Law Firm, Financial Litigation Attorney
Partner

Mr. Glass is a partner resident in K&L Gates’ Boston office, and a member of the firm's Consumer Financial Services Litigation and Class Action Litigation Defense groups, with extensive experience in complex commercial litigation. Mr. Glass's practice focuses on the defense of federal and state class action litigation brought against consumer financial services, mortgage lending, and consumer credit institutions. These class actions concern challenges under federal statutes, including the Fair Housing Act, Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, Truth in Lending Act, Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, state unfair and deceptive acts and practices statutes, and common law claims. He also represents consumer financial services institutions in government enforcement proceedings and individual litigation matters.

617-261-3107
Roger Smerage, KLGates Law Firm, Commercial Disputes Attorney
Associate

Roger Smerage is an associate in the commercial disputes group of the Boston office of K&L Gates. He concentrates his practice in class action litigation and financial institutions and services litigation. Mr. Smerage’s experience includes representing mortgage lenders, banks, loan servicers, and other consumer financial services institutions, as well as wireless telephone companies, computer software developers, and energy providers, in class action and individual litigation matters. He has represented a variety of corporate and individual clients in contract, tort...

617-951-9070