October 17, 2019

October 17, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 16, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 15, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

No Delay for Proposition 65 Listing of Glyphosate

For the past several months, Monsanto has been in court challenging California’s decision to add the chemical glyphosate—the active ingredient in its herbicide Roundup—to the Proposition 65 list. It recently faced a setback when the California Supreme Court rejected Monsanto’s request to stay a lower court’s decision to include glyphosate among the 960 chemicals on the list.  California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) wasted no time after the decision and added glyphosate to the list on July 7, 2017.

What next? While Monsanto’s appeal of the listing still is pending in California’s Fifth District, the ruling in Monsanto Co. v. OEHHA has short-term consequences for companies that make products containing glyphosate and the people who sell them. These companies have one year—until July 7, 2018—to comply with the Proposition 65 requirements.

The law requires businesses to provide a “clear and reasonable” warning on their products that exposure to a listed “chemical known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity” is contained in the products. Monsanto and other companies that make products containing glyphosate will have to develop the requisite label or other warning material. Absent the warning, companies that make glyphosate products may face public or private civil suits under Proposition 65.

With the Proposition 65 list now nearing 1,000 chemicals, the effectiveness of all the warnings may be diluted. Some farmers and other consumers may stay away from products containing glyphosate, but Proposition 65 listings for popular and useful products may not significantly impact product sales.

© 2019 Schiff Hardin LLP

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Alex Garel-Frantzen, Schiff Hardin, Environmental attorney, EPA regulation lawyer, air toxins legal counsel, environment law enforcement
Associate

Alex Garel-Frantzen is an associate at Schiff Hardin who works with the Environmental group on issues like EPA regulations, air toxins, and environmental law enforcement and compliance.

EDUCATION

  • University of Illinois College of Law, J.D., 2015, magna cum laude

    • University of Illinois Law Review, Managing Notes Editor

    • Environmental Moot Court, editor and national team member

    • ...

312-258-5521
Amy M. Rubenstein, general commercial and corporate disputes attorney, Schiff Hardin Law Firm
Partner

Amy M. Rubenstein handles a wide range of cases, such as general commercial and corporate disputes, reinsurance, intellectual property and federal constitutional law. 

312-258-5625