February 20, 2020

February 19, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 18, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 17, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Payday Loan Rule is Officially a Go- or is it?

Today, January 16, 2018, officially marks the effective date of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s final rule targeting what it refers to as “payday debt traps” (the “Rule”).  As outlined in our previous publications (found here and here), the Rule marks a significant change in the landscape for lenders offering short-term loans or longer-term loans with balloon payments, including payday and vehicle title loans.  Looming large is the new requirement that lenders determine a borrower’s ability to repay prior to originating covered loans.

As of today, 60 days following publication of the Rule in the Federal Register, the Rule is a “go” and industry participants are now on the clock, with April 2018 deadlines for certain registered information systems requirements and an August 2019 compliance deadline on the horizon.  And it will likely take industry participants every bit of that time to build the infrastructure and implement the policies and procedures necessary to get into compliance with what is a new frontier for lenders in this space.

But not so fast.  While the Rule is now effective, there remain a number of legislative session days for Congress to repeal the Rule under the Congressional Review Act (“CRA”).  A bipartisan joint resolution to overrule the Rule was introduced in the House of Representatives in early December to do just that, but has been sitting in the House Committee on Financial Services since, with no action to date.  Under the CRA, Congress generally has 60 legislative days (i.e., days when Congress is actually in session) from when the Rule is transmitted to Congress to pass the joint resolution to repeal the Rule (“60-day rule”).  With the Rule’s publication on November 17, 2017, applying this 60-day rule, Congress’ opportunity to repeal the Rule under the CRA is expected to expire sometime in March 2018.

As discussions on this issue progress, interested stakeholders may want to engage in order to achieve their particular policy objectives.  Stay tuned as we continue to monitor the status of the Rule.

Copyright 2020 K & L Gates


About this Author

Jennifer Nagle, KL Gates Law Firm, Financial Services Litigation Attorney

Ms. Nagle is a partner in the litigation department of the firm's Boston office. She concentrates her practice in complex commercial litigation, with emphases in financial institutions and services litigation and class action litigation defense. Ms. Nagle has also counseled clients on compliance with various consumer financial services laws, and in connection with government inquiries into various servicing practices.

Robert W. Sparkes III, Complex Civil and commercial Litigation, KL Gates, Law Firm

Mr. Sparkes is a partner in the Boston office of K&L Gates with extensive experience in complex civil and commercial litigation, including federal and state class action litigation. Mr. Sparkes is a member of the firm’s Financial Institution and Services Litigation group and the Class Action Litigation Defense group. He regularly represents banking, mortgage lending, mortgage servicing, consumer financial services institutions, and other business entities in consumer class actions and individual litigation matters in federal and state courts throughout the United States, including in Massachusetts, California, Missouri, Michigan, Connecticut, Ohio, Delaware, Maryland, Arizona, West Virginia, New Jersey, Vermont, Washington, Illinois, Pennsylvania, and New York. These actions often concern challenges under federal statutes, including the federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, as well as state unfair and deceptive acts and practices statutes, and common law claims. Mr. Sparkes also has experience representing a variety of corporate and individual clients in contract, tort, class action, consumer protection, and other general business litigation and arbitration matters.