September 22, 2020

Volume X, Number 266

September 22, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 21, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Perfect Storm for Automotive Patent Disputes?

As the automotive industry rebounds from its recessionary levels to an all time record level of spending on vehicles and healthy profitability, one of the key drivers of the increased vehicles sales has been increased innovation and major redesigns of vehicles. The number of new products in 2014 increased nearly 50% compared to the preceding 3 years and in 2015 alone, about 50 new or redesigned models were expected to hit the market. In order to keep pace with its Japanese counterparts, domestics OEM’s have worked hard to introduce more sophisticated infotainment features and high end electronics into their mainstream vehicles, which has resulted in a higher electronics/software content in vehicles.

In order to provide such increased content, we have seen a large increase from non-traditional players in the automotive industry and speed to market and premium on protecting innovation is of utmost importance. Automakers have not traditionally seen patents as a revenue-driver, but today, the automotive industry is the 3rd most active sector for worldwide patents and the rate of growth is faster than any other industry. One of the principal drivers has been the push for greater fuel efficiency, but the evolution of connected and autonomous vehicles and improvements in batteries for electric and hybrid vehicles is creating a different landscape in the automotive industry. As the use of patents increases in the automotive industry, new threats are emerging to the traditional OEM business model.

The increase in technology innovations and the healthy nature of the automotive market is putting a bulls-eye on the automotive industry for patent litigation. For starters, traditional competitor-on-competitor cases have continued among suppliers desiring to protect and/or capture market share. In addition, massive technology integration has invited a significant expansion of electronics-related patent suits in recent years against automotive companies, much the same way electronics-focused patent litigation expanded in the past decade against consumer electronics companies selling laptops and cellphones. Perhaps most importantly in terms of the total number of suits, the last few years have seen a significant increase in suits brought by non-practicing entities against automotive companies, in all kinds of technology areas. Some examples include:

  1. American Vehicular Sciences, who has sued OEMs on a number of patents allegedly covering “heads up displays” with elements of motion detection, voice recognition, and user interface features;

  2. Innovative Display Technologies which has asserted a series of patents relating to “light emitting panel assemblies” asserted against LCD displays; and

  3. Beacon Navigation bringing a series of suits in federal court and the International Trade Commission against numerous OEMs relating to automotive GPS navigation systems.

The traditional supply chain in the automotive industry – involving suppliers at many tiers and located in numerous countries all over the world – brings about complicated questions for defending the suits. Some issues include practical ones associated with figuring out the real details of the technology that is being accused of infringement. For U.S. lawsuits, the geographic reach and ability to obtain discovery can place important limits on the available discovery. In addition, normally-fierce competitors are often faced with having to coordinate defenses to avoid contradiction in the suits. This is aside from the legal issues concerning who is ultimately responsible for the patent owner’s assertions of infringement. Lessons learned from consumer electronics industry should provide insight for handling similar issues in the automotive industry.

© 2020 Foley & Lardner LLPNational Law Review, Volume V, Number 281


About this Author

Pavan K. Agarwal, Foley Lardner, Patent Licensing Lawyer, Automotive technology Attorney

Pavan K. Agarwal is a partner and intellectual property lawyer with Foley & Lardner LLP. He practices in various patent law areas, including patent litigation and licensing, as well as opinions and prosecution. Mr. Agarwal represents numerous high-tech clients, with a focus on electronics and automotive technology companies. He has extensive experience representing manufacturing clients in several patent-heavy U.S. Federal Districts and the International Trade Commission. Mr. Agarwal has been involved in several portfolio level licensing negotiations and also manages...

Daljit S. Doogal, Foley Lardner, international practice lawyer, cross-border transactions attorney

Daljit S. Doogal is a partner and business lawyer with Foley & Lardner LLP, where he is managing partner of the Detroit office and chair of the firm’s Business Law Department in Detroit. His international practice focuses on cross-border transactions between the United States and India. Mr. Doogal also focuses his practice in corporate, securities and restructuring law matters. He is a member of the firm's Transactional & Securities, Private Equity & Venture Capital and International Practices, and its Automotive Industry Team. He is also co-chair of the India Business Committee and the Asian Pacific American Affinity Group for Foley. 

michael r. houston, foley lardner, intellectual property attorney, patent lawyer

Michael R. Houston is a partner and intellectual property attorney with Foley & Lardner LLP, where his practice focuses on patent challenges before the USPTO, and patent litigation at the trial and appeal levels across a wide array of technology areas. Dr. Houston has litigated patents involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, biorenewable fuels, microelectronics fabrication and packaging, electronics, and general chemical and polymer processing, among others. More recently, Dr. Houston has been heavily involved in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings at...

Kevin J. Malaney, Foley Lardner, Patent Resolution Attorney, Trade Secret Matters Lawyer,

Kevin J. Malaney is senior counsel and an intellectual property lawyer with Foley & Lardner LLP where his practice involves the resolution of patent, trade secret, and other intellectual property disputes. Mr. Malaney is a member of the firm’s Intellectual Property Litigation Practice.

His case experience spans many diverse technologies with a primary focus on computer software and hardware disputes. Exemplary technologies include process control systems, VoIP, 802.11, biometric encryption and decryption, and media content delivery...