April 17, 2021

Volume XI, Number 107


April 16, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

April 15, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

April 14, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

PHMSA Issues Gas Pipeline Regulatory Reform Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

On June 9, 2020, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (“PHMSA”) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NOPR”) to revise the Federal Pipeline Safety Regulations (“Regulations”) to reduce regulatory burdens associated with construction, operation, and maintenance of gas pipeline systems. The NOPR is in response to a series of executive orders (E.O. 13771, 13777, and 13783) calling on agencies to reduce or eliminate regulatory burdens. According to PHMSA, the value of the annualized cost savings associated with the proposed amendments is approximately $129 million (at a discount rate of 7 percent). The key reforms, which ease certain monitoring requirements, streamline reporting obligations, and reduce the burden on distribution pipelines associated with the Distribution Integrity Management Program (“DIMP”), are summarized below.

DIMP Requirements

PHMSA has proposed two revisions to DIMP requirements to ease the regulatory burden on gas distribution operators. The NOPR would provide operators of farm taps originating from regulated source pipelines the flexibility to choose between inspecting pressure regulators pursuant to their DIMP, or the inspection requirements of § 192.740 of the Regulations, which currently requires pressure regulators and overpressure protection equipment to be inspected and tested at least once every three calendar years. The NOPR proposes to exempt farm taps originating from unregulated gathering and production pipelines from both DIMP and incident and annual reporting requirements.

The NOPR also proposes to exempt master meter operators from DIMP requirements. Given the small and simple nature of master meter systems, PHMSA determined that requiring a DIMP for these systems has provided little safety benefit and imposed a significant burden. Master meter operators would still be subject to the rest of the pipeline safety regulations under Part 192 of the Regulations, such as operations and maintenance requirements, continuing surveillance requirements, and failure to investigate requirements.

Reporting Requirements

The NOPR proposes to streamline reporting requirements for distribution operators by eliminating the requirement for operators to submit mechanical fitting failure reports (“MFFs”) through DOT Form PHMSA F-7100.1-2. Instead, PHMSA will collect necessary information by adding a MFF count to the gas distribution annual report form.

PHMSA also proposes to raise the threshold for reporting incidents that result in property damage from $50,000 to $122,000. This threshold, which hasn’t been revised in over 30 years, is being revised to account for inflation. Adjusting the threshold will significantly decrease the number of reportable incidents. PHMSA intends to update the monetary damage threshold on a regular basis in the future.

Monitoring Requirements

The NOPR also proposes amendments related to corrosion control. PHMSA proposes to revise the requirement of regular inspection of rectifiers on gas pipelines under § 192.485(b) of the Regulations to clarify that operators may inspect rectifier stations onsite or remotely. Remote monitoring of rectifiers should coincide with when the operator conducts a cathodic protection test, which currently occurs once each calendar year.

Currently, all onshore gas pipelines exposed to the atmosphere must be inspected once every three years. PHMSA proposes to extend the maximum inspection interval for distribution service lines to once every five calendar years, unless atmospheric corrosion was identified on the last inspection. If an operator identifies atmospheric corrosion on a service line during an inspection, then the interval for the subsequent inspection would be once every three years. In other words, absent atmospheric corrosion, operators are permitted to inspect once every five years.

In addition to the cost savings, the proposed reforms, which are largely deregulatory in nature, benefit gas pipeline operators by reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens, increasing flexibility and administrative efficiency, and clarifying existing regulations. Eliminating and streamlining redundant reporting requirements, exempting certain operators from DIMP requirements, and increasing the monetary threshold for reportable incidents would reduce the volume of information shippers will have to review and will enable PHMSA to focus on other important safety and compliance activities.

Comments on the NOPR are due by August 10, 2020. 

©2021 Pierce Atwood LLP. All rights reserved.National Law Review, Volume X, Number 163



About this Author

Randall S. Rich Pierce Atwood Partner DC Energy Energy Infrastructure Project Development & Finance

Randall Rich is the Leader of our Energy Practice Group and the partner-in-charge of the Washington, DC office. Throughout his over 38 years of experience, beginning in the Office of General Counsel of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and continuing for more than 23 years at Bracewell, LLP, Randy always strives to form close personal bonds with clients as well as trusting relationships with both regulators and his colleagues in the energy bar. He gains an intimate understanding of the business and legal needs of clients by working for extended periods in their offices, hand-...

202- 530-6424
Valerie L. Green Pierce Atwood Partner DC  Energy Energy Infrastructure Project Development  Finance Litigation

Valerie Green focuses her practice on natural gas, electricity, renewable energy, and regulatory and compliance issues involving the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and other administrative agencies. Clients rely on Valerie’s responsiveness, attention to detail, and deep knowledge of regulatory process and precedent in proceedings involving administrative litigation, compliance audits and investigations, and in appellate litigation before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Valerie’s focus on coalition and consensus building in situations involving...

Kayla Grant  energy regulatory attorney Portland ME

Kayla Grant is an experienced energy regulatory attorney with a strong interest in energy policy and regulation. Kayla capitalizes on her prior experience as an attorney advisor to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) administrative law judges to advocate for clients in utility ratemaking and electric transmission matters. This includes advising clients on issues related to FERC jurisdiction, cost-of-service and formula transmission rates, electric utility tariffs, and RTO/ISO markets. Kayla also assists clients with North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Reliability...