February 26, 2020

February 25, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 24, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Physician Provided PHI to Media When “No Comment” Would Have Sufficed

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office for Civil Rights (OCR) announced a $125,000 no-fault settlement and two-year corrective action plan with Allergy Associates of Hartford, P.C. (Allergy Associates) stemming from an incident involving a physician who impermissibly released protected health information (PHI) to the media.

In February 2015, a patient of Allergy Associates contacted a television station in Connecticut  about a dispute that had occurred between the patient and a physician at Allergy Associates. The dispute revolved around an allegation that Allergy Associates turned the patient away because she used a service animal. The television station contacted the implicated physician for comment soon thereafter and Allergy Associates’ Privacy Officer instructed the physician to remain silent on the matter. According to the HHS-OCR settlement announcement and Resolution Agreement, the physician ignored the Privacy Officer’s instructions and impermissibly disclosed the PHI of the patient to the television station. As a reminder, the Health Insurance and Portability Act (HIPAA) generally prohibits health care providers from disclosing a patient’s protected health information to media unless either (i) the patient or their personal representative authorizes the disclosure, or (ii) the disclosure fits within a HIPAA exception.

Following the impermissible disclosure, and after HHS notified Allergy Associates that it initiated its investigation, Allergy Associates failed to take any disciplinary action against the physician for this impermissible disclosure or pursue any corrective action following the disclosure. Please note that HIPAA requires a covered entity to have and apply appropriate sanctions against its workforce members who fail to comply with its own privacy policies and procedures or HIPAA’s privacy regulations, and further document such sanctions.

This settlement, announced on November 26, 2018, comes on the heels of three other media-related HHS-OCR settlements that DBR on Data reported on in September involving the disclosure of PHI in the course of filming a television series  at various hospitals in Massachusetts. Together, these recent HHS-OCR enforcement activities reflect HHS-OCR’s watchfulness as health care providers continue to face challenges that accompany increasing traditional and social media presence in daily health care operations.

© 2020 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved.


About this Author

Sumaya Noush, Drinker Biddle Law Firm, HealthCare Attorney

Sumaya Noush counsels health care clients on strategic and operational matters including transactions, corporate governance, and regulatory compliance. She helps her clients navigate the daily challenges of running their operations while identifying opportunities for growth in today’s rapidly evolving and highly competitive health care market.

Sumaya previously served as a law clerk for Drinker Biddle, an instructor at Yale’s Bioethics Institute where she taught a seminar on FDA law and medical ethics, and a Visiting Scholar at...