March 30, 2020

March 29, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

March 28, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

March 27, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

President Obama Nominates Jessica Rosenworcel for Second Term as FCC Commissioner

Legislative Activity

MOBILE NOW Act Reintroduced in Senate

On Tuesday, January 3, Sen. John Thune (R-SD), chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation (Senate Commerce Committee), reintroduced S.19, the Making Opportunities for Broadband Investment and Limiting Excessive and Needless Obstacles to Wireless (MOBILE NOW) Act. The bill targets the build-out of next-generation 5G wireless broadband networks by ensuring that more spectrum is made available for commercial use and by reducing various regulatory barriers associated with network build-out. Sen. Thune introduced the bill during the 114th Congress, and the Senate Commerce Committee passed it by voice vote in March 2016. However, the legislation was never passed by the full Senate. In a press release, Sen. Thune characterized the bill as “a gateway to faster and more extensive wireless coverage that empowers more Americans to use technologies requiring a connection to the internet.” Sen. Thune further indicated that the MOBILE NOW Act is “an early technology priority” for the 115th Congress and one that he expects the Senate Commerce Committee to “send to the Senate floor soon.”

Rep. Walden Introduces Two Telecom Bills

On Wednesday, January 4, Rep. Greg Walden (D-OR), the chairman of the House Energy & Commerce Committee (House Commerce Committee) introduced two telecom bills. While the text of the bills has not yet been released, the bill titles suggest that the first bill, H.R.290, would “provide for greater transparency and efficiency in the procedures followed by the Federal Communications Commission [FCC].” The second bill, H.R.288, would “ensure that small business providers of broadband Internet access service can devote resources to broadband deployment rather than compliance with cumbersome regulatory requirements.” Both bills have been referred to the House Commerce Committee for consideration.

Regulatory Activity

President Obama Nominates Jessica Rosenworcel for Second Term as FCC Commissioner

On January 4, President Barack Obama nominated former FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel for reappointment as an FCC Commissioner according to a White House press release. Ms. Rosenworcel’s tenure as a Commissioner ended January 3 after the previous session of Congress did not reconfirm her for a second term. Her nomination for a second term has been sent to the Senate for confirmation and, if confirmed, she would serve a five year term from July 1, 2015. FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler issued a statement “applaud[ing] President Obama’s reappointment of Jessica Rosenworcel to the FCC” and expressing his “hope that Congress will act quickly to confirm her nomination.” According to some reports, Senate Republicans—including Senate Commerce Committee Chairman John Thune—are opposed to reconfirming Ms. Rosenworcel prior to President-Elect Donald Trump taking office.

FCC’s Media Bureau Denies Petitions for Reconsideration of Certain Ownership Reporting Obligations of Broadcast Stations; FCC Commissioners Pai and O’Rielly Issue Statement Objecting to Decision

On January 4, the FCC’s Media Bureau released an Order on Reconsideration denying petitions for reconsideration of the 323 and 323-E Order. The 323 and 323-E Order revised the FCC Form 323 (Ownership Report for Commercial Broadcast Stations) and Form 323-E (Ownership Report for Noncommercial Broadcast Stations) by, among other things, adopting a requirement that form filers “provide a unique FCC Registration Number (FRN) generated by the Commission Registration System (CORES) . . . for each attributable interest holder that must be reported on the forms,” according to the Media Bureau. Petitions for reconsideration were filed by the “American Public Media Group (APMG), the NCE Licensees, the Public Broadcasting Parties, and the State University of New York (SUNY)” seeking “reconsideration of the [FCC’s] decision to apply the FRN requirement to Form 323-E.” The Media Bureau stated that the petitions were denied “because they repeat arguments that the [FCC] fully considered and rejected in the 323 and 323-E Order and they identify no material error, omission, or other reason warranting reconsideration.”

FCC Commissioners Ajit Pai and Michael O’Rielly released a statement “strongly object[ing] to the Media Bureau’s decision,” stating that the 323 and 323-E Order ruling “no longer enjoys the support of the majority of Commissioners – nor is there a majority that supports [the] Media Bureau decision – so it was wrong for the Bureau to bypass Commissioners and reaffirm these reporting requirements unilaterally.” Commissioners Pai and O’Rielly “encourage[d] public broadcasters to file an application for review so that the newly constituted Commission will have an opportunity to revisit this matter,” commenting that the 323 and 323-E Order “impose[d] unnecessary reporting requirements on noncommercial educational (NCE) television stations.”

© Copyright 2020 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Steven F. Lederman, Communications, ATtorney, Squire PAtton Boggs, law firm
Senior Associate

Steven Lederman focuses his practice on general communications law matters including issues involving regulation of wireline, wireless and cable television providers. Steve has an in-depth understanding of state and federal regulations impacting telecommunications providers and has participated in proceedings before the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). He has extensive experience with respect to FCC decisions, federal statutes, and regulations affecting telecommunications and cable television providers. In addition, Steve has experience with communications-...

202-626-6283
Koyulyn K. Miller, Squire Patton, Technology, Communication Lawyer, FCC
Associate

Koyulyn Miller advises clients in the communications and technology sectors, specializing in enforcement matters before government agencies, including the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). She works tirelessly to unpack and analyze complex legal matters, counseling clients on how to navigate enforcement and other regulatory proceedings. Drawing from her years of experience working in the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau, she educates clients on practical matters such as how to respond to Commission correspondence and enforcement actions, how and when to broach negotiations with Commission staff, and how to implement proactive measures to ensure compliance with the relevant regulations and statutory provisions going forward.

202 457 5321
Peter M. Bean, Squire Patton, Communication Licensing Lawyer
Associate

Peter Bean is a member of the firm’s Communications Practice Group. Peter represents public and private sector US and non-US clients in the technology and communications industries on a range of complex legal, regulatory and legislative issues, many of which are at the forefront of telecommunications law and policy. Peter’s practice is global in scope and leverages the firm’s global footprint for the benefit of clients. In the US, his practice includes varied experience practicing before the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and counseling clients on matters...

202 457 6625
Benjamin D. Tarbell, Squire Paton, Government Enforcement Lawyer,
Attorney

Benjamin Tarbell draws on his experience in regulatory policy to assist clients in the technology and communications sectors, specializing in matters before government agencies including the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

While attending law school, Ben clerked full-time for Commissioner Ajit Pai of the FCC. In that role, he worked alongside the Commissioner’s advisors to draft statements, speeches and agency publications, and advise the Commissioner on FCC issues including the Broadcast Incentive Auction, media ownership, market...

202 457 6159