July 24, 2019

July 23, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 22, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Question of Consent Turns Putative TCPA Fax Class Action Into Junk

A recent decision by a Connecticut district court reiterates that the issue of consent may foreclose class certification in Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) junk fax cases. The action was one of several putative class actions brought by Gorss Motels Inc. against suppliers to Wyndham hotels and its various franchisees. Gorss was a former corporate owner of a Wyndham franchise hotel. Defendant Otis Elevator Co. had a contract with a subsidiary of Wyndham as an approved supplier. The contract provided that the subsidiary would share information about Otis with Wyndham franchisees. Gorss filed the action after a third-party vendor sent a “fax blast” regarding Otis to Wyndham franchisees. The fax blast contained an opt-out disclaimer and was allegedly transmitted to 2,936 fax numbers.

Gorss argued that the fax was a junk fax in violation of the TCPA. To have a viable TCPA claim, the fax must have been sent without prior express permission of the Wyndham franchisees, in other words, without their consent. While the parties agreed there were several questions of law and fact common to the putative class, Otis argued that the question of consent required an individualized inquiry and body of proof, which would preclude a finding of predominance under Rule 23.

The court noted that several other courts had identified the issue of consent in TCPA cases as presenting individualized questions of proof sufficient to defeat a claim of predominance. The court found that Otis’ preexisting relationships with many putative class members (Wyndham franchisees) was probative of the issue of consent and would require individualized inquiry into prior communications between Otis and the putative class members, making the action unsuitable for class certification.

Gorss Motels, Inc. v. Otis Elevator Co., No. 3:16-cv-1781-KAD, 2019 WL 1490102 (D. Conn. Apr. 4, 2019)

©2011-2019 Carlton Fields, P.A.


About this Author

Brooke Patterson  Associate Carlton Fields Litigation Insurance Financial Services

Brooke Patterson is a litigation associate whose practice focuses on class actions and complex civil litigation matters throughout the United States involving the insurance and financial services industries.While in law school, Brooke served as a judicial intern for the Honorable Edwin G. Torres, where she researched and prepared judicial opinions on various discovery and litigation issues. She was an editorial member of the University of Miami Law Review, and was on the executive board for the Charles C. Papy, Jr. Moot Court Board.