March 8, 2021

Volume XI, Number 67


March 08, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

March 05, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Responding to Third Party Subpoenas


In civil litigation, litigants often seek information from third parties by using document subpoenas. In federal court, those subpoenas are governed by Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Upon receipt of a subpoena, consider the following:

Calendar the return date and any deadlines for objections

A third party should calendar both the return date and the deadline for objections. The return date is listed on the subpoena, and is the deadline by which the requested documents must arrive at a particular location. Third parties should also calendar the deadline for objections. Unless local rules state otherwise, third parties must object to subpoenas by either the return date or 14 days after the subpoena is served, whichever date is earlier. Keep in mind that third parties always have the option of working constructively with the subpoenaing party in an effort to reach an agreement relating to the production of documents that satisfies both the third party and the litigant seeking information.

Identify and preserve documents

A duty to preserve and produce subpoenaed material arises once litigants formally serve third parties with subpoenas. The third party served with a subpoena must ensure that all potentially responsive documents are identified, collected, and preserved for production by, among other steps, issuing a litigation hold that instructs personnel to locate, identify, and preserve all documents (in hard-copy or electronic form) that are potentially responsive; and taking appropriate steps to ensure that custodians of the records preserve and maintain the integrity of the materials.

Determine the best way to proceed

Simultaneously with identifying and preserving documents, third parties should determine how they want to proceed. This may hinge on factors such as the nature of the documents requested, the scope of the requests and the quantity of potentially responsive documents, the cost of complying with the subpoena, and whether any basis for contesting the subpoena exists.

Take Action

Complying with Subpoenas

In this instance, a third party must produce all responsive documents in their custody and control which are not privileged. Privileged documents may be withheld, but a privilege log identifying the documents withheld and the grounds for withholding the materials must be produced.

Objecting to Subpoenas

A third party may serve written objections to a subpoena. Generally, parties objecting to subpoenas must address each objectionable request separately, state the objections to each request, and include the specific grounds for each objection. Common grounds for objections include that the subpoena: (1) imposes undue burden or expense; (2) seeks documents containing irrelevant information; (3) is vague and/or ambiguous; and (4) seeks disclosure of trade secrets or other privileged or confidential information.

Moving to Quash or Modify Subpoenas

A third party may move to quash or modify a subpoena, or for a protective order to limit the obligations under the subpoena. The procedure for filing motions to quash, modify, or for a protective order varies based on the court, but generally, courts require parties to file such motions before the return date.

Copyright 2020 K & L GatesNational Law Review, Volume X, Number 289



About this Author

Gregory R. Youman Complex Commercial Litigation K&L Gates Boston, MA

Mr. Youman has nearly two decades of experience in a variety of complex commercial litigation, including business disputes, product liability, toxic tort, insurance coverage, professional liability and real estate matters. Throughout his legal career, Mr. Youman has worked closely with in-house legal teams to evaluate and implement case strategy, as well as to address day-to-day procedural matters, which has given him a well-rounded, strategic, and practical perspective on overall case development and management throughout all phases of litigation.

Mr. Youman is an experienced...

Molly R. Maidman Complex Commercial Litigation & Disputes Attorney K&L Gates Boston, MA

Molly Maidman is an associate at the firm’s Boston office. She is a member of the complex commercial litigation and disputes practice group.

Professional Background

Ms. Maidman was a summer associate for the firm in 2018. Prior to joining the firm, she served as a judicial intern to the Honorable Frank J. Bailey in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts. She also worked as a student attorney in the Boston University School of Law Civil Litigation Clinic, and as a teaching assistant in Boston University School of Law’s first-year writing program...