November 26, 2021

Volume XI, Number 330

Advertisement
Advertisement

November 24, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

South Carolina Supreme Court Declares 2019 Tax Sale Bill Unconstitutional

The South Carolina Supreme Court issued its three-page opinion yesterday in Mercury Funding, LLC, v. Beaufort County Tax Collector Kimberly Chesney, a case involving the constitutionality of an act extending the 2019 tax sale redemption period. The Court’s opinion likely impacts the portfolios of tax sale buyers who participated in the 2019 tax sale by calling into question the validity of the tax sale or any tax deed a county might issue related to a 2019 tax sale property.

In September 2020, the South Carolina General Assembly passed House Bill 3755, which became Act 174 the next month. The Act dealt primarily with automobile insurance, but also included a provision impacting real property tax sales. Under South Carolina law before Act 174, delinquent taxpayers and other interested parties had one year from the date of the tax sale to redeem real property. Act 174 extended that redemption period for an additional year, but only for real property sold at the 2019 tax sale.

Petitioner Mercury Funding bought property at the 2019 tax sale impacted by the extended redemption period. It sued, challenging the constitutionality of the act under the South Carolina Constitution. The parties generally conceded the Act was unconstitutional, but disagreed on how to address the impacts of a ruling from the Court that the Act was unconstitutional, including:

  1. title issues attached to properties that were redeemed during the extended redemption period;

  2. whether delinquent taxpayers would have additional time to redeem properties that were not redeemed before the Act; and

  3. whether additional written notices to delinquent taxpayers were required before the redemption period could expire and a tax deed issued.

Although the parties explained to the Court during argument that they had reached an agreement on many of these issues, the Court declined to address those issues in its opinion. It instead declared the Act unconstitutional and explained that these other issues “should be vetted initially by a trial court.” Because the case was filed in the Court’s original jurisdiction, this likely means that the related issues will need to be resolved in another lawsuit filed in the Circuit Court, which will later be addressed by the appellate courts in the regular course of litigation.

Copyright ©2021 Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLPNational Law Review, Volume XI, Number 182
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Matt Abee Tax Litigation Attorney Nelson Mullins South Carolina
Partner

Matt practices in tax lien, escrow, lost property, and redemption law. He also works in the areas of appellate, business litigation, consumer financial services litigation, and employment litigation. Matt also has experience with litigating international child abduction cases under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction and the International Child Abduction Remedies Act. Matt has argued before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Va. and the South Carolina Court of Appeals in Columbia, S.C. He has also...

803-255-9335
Randall L. Saunders Financing Attorney Nelson Mullins Huntington
Partner

In addition to chairing the tax lien and litigation group at Nelson Mullins, his practice focuses on banking, financial services, business, taxation, and real estate matters. He routinely handles litigation, administrative, and transactional matters. While his practice originates in the heart of Appalachia, he routinely handles matters in jurisdictions across the country. Mr. Saunders also currently serves as the firm's Pro Bono chair.

304-526-3507
Megan Ware-Fitzgerald Litigation Attorney Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough Huntington, WV
Attorney

Megan Ware-Fitzgerald is a member of the litigation team and focuses her practice on commercial litigation, financial services litigation and tax lien resolution.

Experience

Following is a selected sampling of matters and is provided for informational purposes only. Past success does not indicate the likelihood of success in any future matter.

304-526-3511
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement