February 21, 2019

February 21, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 20, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 19, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Standards for Use of Opiates in Treatment of Pain Changes in Ohio

On December 23, 2018, new State Medical Board of Ohio regulations became effective which marked another change in the legal standards governing provider use of opiates for treatment of pain.[1] Notably, these new regulations also serve to rescind and replace Ohio’s previously long-standing “Chronic Pain Rules,” also known as the “Intractable Pain Rules,” which were first adopted as a component of the earlier “5th Vital Sign” era which preceded the current opioid epidemicIn this respect, these new rules eliminate the last remaining regulatory vestige of that prior era.

In rescinding and replacing the previous law, the new rule combines standards for the use of opiates in the treatment of non-acute pain – meaning pain that has lasted for more than six weeks.  The new definitions include those for “sub-acute pain” and “chronic pain.” Further, an added time component to the definition of “acute pain” has also been implemented. These new rules do not apply to hospice care patients or patients being treated for a terminal condition.

The new rules impose significant changes in provider approach to the use of these medications, as well as specific documentation requirements. For example, providers are now required to consider and document non-pharmacologic and non-opioid treatment options. If opioids are used, the provider must prescribe the minimum quantity and potency to treat the expected duration of the pain and to improve patient functionality. 

Moreover, explicit treatment and documentation requirements now imposed by the new rules include the following: 1) history and physical examination, including prior treatment response, patient compliance, and screening for substance misuse or substance use disorder; 2) laboratory and diagnostic testing, specifically to include urine drug screening if evidence of substance misuse or a substance use disorder exists; 3) functional pain assessment; 4) comprehensive treatment plan, including but not limited to clinical rationale for the choice and dosage of medication and planned duration of treatment, and steps for further assessment and follow-up; 5) discussions with the patient as to risks and benefits of the medication, including potential for addiction and overdose risks, as well as patient responsibility for safe drug storage and appropriate disposal; and 6) offering of naloxone prescription under certain circumstances.[2]

The new rules also impose varying standards based upon the patient’s Morphine Equivalent Dose (“MED”) – creating benchmarks at MED levels equal to or greater than 50, 80, and 120. While these standards vary based on the MED level, they can consist of written informed consent, specialist consultations, detailed pain treatment agreements, naloxone recommendations, and medication therapy management review, among other required features. Finally, specific requirements are set forth as to mandatory follow-up assessments.

It is clear that these new rules mark another chapter in the evolution of treatment and documentation standards for the use of opiates in Ohio.  Should you have any questions regarding these significant new rules, please contact your Dinsmore health care attorney for further information.


[1] The new rules are located at Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) 4731-11-14. See here.

[2] Providers must also obtain and document review the results of an OARRS check in compliance with OAC 4731-11-11.

© 2019 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Eric J. Plinke, Dinsmore Law, Health Care Lawyer, Corporate Attorney
Partner

Eric Plinke is a Partner in the Corporate Department and Health Law Practice Group, and he routinely advises corporate and individual clients regarding a wide-range of health care industry legal issues. He has counseled clients in practice formation and acquisition, hospital and joint venture transactions, hospital and medical practice affiliations, contract review and preparation, compliance programs, HIPAA regulations, scope of practice issues, telemedicine and Stark law and Anti-kickback statutes, as well as significant experience counseling in ambulatory surgery centers and other joint...

614-227-4213
Daniel S. Zinsmaster, Dinsmore Law Firm, Health Care Lawyer
Partner

Dan provides trusted counsel and advocacy to health care clients on a variety of matters, such as corporate compliance, provider credentialing, administrative proceedings and litigation.  He also advises clients on practice formation and acquisition, as well as contract review and preparation.  In recent years, Dan has helped health care companies and providers navigate through fraud and abuse investigations, antitrust reviews, and other white collar criminal matters.  He is a frequent author and lecturer on telehealth and telemedicine issues.

Prior to joining Dinsmore, Dan practiced for nearly seven years with the State Medical Board of Ohio, where he advised board members and agency personnel on issues related to the Medical Practices Act of Ohio, Chapter 119 Administrative Procedures, and federal rules and regulations implicating the area of health care.  His substantial regulatory experience enables him to bring a unique and insightful perspective to handling diverse and complex health care matters, and his thorough understanding of health care laws and policies helps him serve as a valuable resource to corporations, health care associations, hospitals, medical practices and individual practitioners. 

In addition to his experience with federal and state health care regulatory agencies, Dan has successfully aided clients appearing before a number of other administrative or executive entities, including the Ohio Department of Commerce, Accountancy Board of Ohio, and the Ohio Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and Surveyors.  He previously served as an extern for the Legal Office of the Ohio governor, as well as the Business & Regulations Division of the Columbus city attorney’s office.

(614) 628-6949