February 28, 2020

February 27, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 26, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 25, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

States Urge FERC to Reduce Public Utility Rates Following Tax Reform

Nineteen states have asked the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to modify public utilities’ FERC-regulated cost-of-service revenue requirements to reflect the recent reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate. The states claimed that “[t]he Tax Cuts and Jobs Act significantly reduces the marginal federal corporate income tax rate from 35 to 21 percent. Unless the Commission adjusts… revenue requirements to reflect this federal corporate income tax reduction, utility customers nationwide will be overpaying for their electric and gas service by hundreds of millions of dollars.”

According to the states, the level of current corporate income tax expense incorporated into public utilities’ rates could render those rates unjust and unreasonable, and if FERC does not proactively reduce those rates, a significant amount of money would need to be refunded to customers in the future.

FERC has taken similar action in the past in response to a reduction in the corporate tax rate. Under the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the federal corporate income tax rate was reduced from 46% to 34%. In response, FERC issued Order 475 to allow electric public utilities to submit a voluntary, abbreviated rate filing to reflect a decrease in costs to customers based on the new 34% federal corporate income tax rate. The abbreviated filing reflected a “formula reduction in rates” based on data supplied by the utility in its most recent rate filing at the time (not its FERC Form 1). FERC believed that this method would best allow utilities to closely approximate the actual cost-to-service impact of the lower, 34% tax rate. This was much shorter than a full rate case proceeding and allowed participating utilities to more quickly pass through the benefit of the lower corporate tax rate to their ratepayers.

The states called upon FERC to use its prior experience and expertise, along with stakeholder input, to determine the appropriate procedural mechanisms needed to curtail the scope of over-collections of tax expenses, the types of voluntary rate reductions or refunds that can be implemented under existing rules and regulations, and the best way to ensure that customers remain unharmed by any delay in making those changes. It seems very likely that FERC will consider some or all of this advice as it formulates its response to the change in tax law.

Copyright © 2020 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.


About this Author

J. Daniel Skees, Energy attorney, Morgan Lewis

J. Daniel Skees represents electric utilities before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and other agencies on rate, regulatory, and transaction matters. He handles rate and tariff proceedings, electric utility and holding company transactions, reliability standards development and compliance, and FERC rulemaking proceedings. The mandatory electric reliability standards under Section 215 of the Federal Power Act are a major focus of Dan’s practice. He advises clients regarding compliance with reliability standards, and helps them participate in the...

Serge Agbre, Morgan Lewis, Energy Lawyer, FERC Compliance,

Serge Agbre represents electric, natural gas, and other energy industry participants in a variety of regulatory, transactional, and litigation matters before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). His practice includes related court appeals. Serge represents clients in enforcement matters, rate proceedings, certificate proceedings, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) matters connected to gas infrastructure projects. He also represents electric utilities in rate proceedings, tariff proceedings, and reliability standard compliance and enforcement matters. Serge is admitted in New Jersey only, and his practice is supervised by DC bar members.