March 23, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 82


March 23, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

March 22, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

March 21, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

March 20, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Stricter Standards Emerging for Subscription-Style Services that Renew Automatically

Subscription-style services that renew automatically from month to month (or year to year) are all the rage. Businesses love them because they can provide ongoing revenue streams. Consumers often like them for convenience. But regulators (and consumers who sometimes may become surprised when a “free” trial converts into an unexpected paid service or who encounter hurdles when trying to cancel a service) increasingly view them with suspicion.

For these reasons, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and many states have taken action to help implement the following types of consumer protections for auto-renewal programs: (a) clear disclosure of terms prior to enrollment; (b) affirmative and specific acceptance of the auto-renewal feature; (c) confirmation of terms immediately after enrollment; (d) notice prior to an annual renewal period, including clear disclosure of the cancellation method; and (e) availability of functioning cancellation methods that are convenient, fast, free, and at least as easy as any enrollment method(s).1

One area receiving attention is the use of a separate checkbox (or other similar mechanism) for the consumer to accept auto-renewal terms apart from any other terms. A Vermont statute that took effect in 2019 provides: “[a] contract between a consumer and a seller or a lessor with an initial term of one year or longer that renews for a subsequent term that is longer than one month shall not renew automatically unless … in addition to accepting the contract, the consumer takes an affirmative action to opt in to the automatic renewal provision.”2 Additionally, the FTC has recommended separate acceptance in a policy statement,3 and has imposed a specific requirement for separate acceptance in at least one recent enforcement action.4

Whether a totally separate checkbox (or similar mechanism) is strictly required in every case remains an open question – at least where: (1) the acceptance of the auto-renewal terms comes first and is extremely clear, (2) any additional terms (such as a privacy policy) are referenced via a simple link and don’t change the auto-renewal terms, and (3) any reference to acceptance of additional terms doesn’t blur or interfere with the consumer’s ability to clearly see and understand the auto-renewal terms being accepted.

Nevertheless, in light of the statutory and regulatory developments mentioned above – and possible further expansion of these trends – it is a recommended best practice to seek affirmative acceptance of auto-renewal terms apart from any other terms. Specifically, companies should consider the following principles when seeking consent from consumers for auto-renewal program terms:

  • The auto-renewal terms should be clear and conspicuous at the time and place where the consumer enrolls.

  • The consumer’s consent to the auto-renewal terms should be separate from any other terms or portion of the transaction.

  • The mechanism used to seek consent (checkbox, signature, express consent button, etc.) must appear immediately adjacent to the auto-renewal terms.

  • Do not use a pre-checked box for acceptance.

  • Do not rely on terms in a linked set of general Terms of Service/Use to set forth the auto-renewal terms.

In addition to obtaining unambiguous, affirmative consent to clearly disclosed auto-renewal terms, companies should remember to follow the other requirements referenced above (often with differences in time periods and other details under individual state statutes) to do the following: (1) send any statutorily required post-enrollment confirmation email (with a reminder of the easy-to-use cancellation method(s)); (2) send any statutorily required annual auto-renewal reminder (again with a reminder of the easy-to-use cancellation method(s)); and (3) make sure the cancellation method is fast, convenient, free, not encumbered with efforts to persuade the consumer to re-enroll, and at least as easy to use as the available enrollment method(s).

Those seeking assistance with developing or reviewing the terms of their auto-renewal program should consult with experienced promotional law counsel.


1 See, e.g., Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17602D.C. Code § 28A-203N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 527-a; FTC, Bringing Dark Patterns to Light, pp. 11-15 (Sept. 2022).

2 9 V.S.A. § 2454a(a)(2).

3 FTC, Enforcement Policy Statement Regarding Negative Option Marketing (Nov. 4, 2021).

4 See, e.g., FTC v. Vonage Holdings Corp., et al., No. 3:22-cv-6435 (D.N.J. Nov. 3, 2022).

©2023 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved. National Law Review, Volume XIII, Number 32

About this Author

Ed Chansky, Greenberg Traurig Law Firm, Las Vegas, Intellectual Property Law Attorney

Ed Chansky focuses his practice in the areas of intellectual property (particularly development, selection, protection and licensing of trademarks worldwide) and advertising, sales promotion, and trade-regulation law, including charitable promotions, cause-related marketing, sweepstakes, contests, gift cards, eCommerce, substantiation of advertising claims, social gaming, social media, and all aspects of unfair or deceptive trade practices in a wide variety of industries.

A trusted advisor to many national companies, Ed is a frequent speaker at...

 Erica L. Okerberg Greenberg Traurig Las Vegas Associate Gaming Marketing, Advertising, Sweepstakes  Promotions Law Regulatory & Compliance Video Games  Esports

Erica L. Okerberg focuses her practice on gaming law, including licensing and regulatory work; and promotional law, including sweepstakes and social gaming. Erica's experience includes: assisting U.S. and international clients with regulatory and operational matters; representing clients in connection with gaming applications; researching and analyzing a variety of gaming-related topics – from state and federal sports wagering requirements to the application of anti-gambling laws; preparing materials for and assisting with sweepstakes, contests, and other promotional offers; and counseling...

Victoria Noam Gaming Attorney Las Vegas

Victoria Noam is a member of the Gaming Practice in Greenberg Traurig’s Las Vegas office. She helps with handling complex gaming licensing, operational, and regulatory matters for U.S. and international clients. Victoria serves the firm’s gaming clients, including land-based and online casino companies, sports wagering operators, manufacturers and distributors, and other companies providing services to the gaming industry. She also provides support in promotional matters, including drafting sweepstakes rules, researching cause-related marketing laws, and registering...