August 13, 2020

Volume X, Number 226

August 12, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 11, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 10, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Tax Reform and Investment Management: Does the Foreign-Derived Intangible Income Provision Benefit U.S. Fund Managers?

On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”). In previous alerts, we have discussed how the Act made significant changes to the foreign provisions of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). This alert, which is part of our series of alerts on the impact of the Act with respect to the investment management industry, will continue our discussion of the more important foreign provisions that apply to investment funds. Chief among these is new Section 250 of the Code, which permits a deduction for domestic C corporations that reduces the effective U.S. tax rate on certain types of foreign-derived income. As discussed below, this new deduction may provide a benefit to U.S. fund managers that provide investment management services to certain types of foreign investment funds. 

The new Section 250, referred to as the Foreign-Derived Intangible Income (“FDII”) regime, incentivizes domestic C corporations to maintain their onshore operations by allowing a deduction that reduces the effective U.S. tax rate on certain foreign-derived income (i.e., the corporation’s FDII). Despite what its name suggests, the FDII regime does not apply solely to income that is attributable to intangibles but rather to “deemed” intangible income with respect to sales of goods, tangible and intangible property, and the provision of services. 

The calculation of a U.S. corporation’s FDII is complex but generally is that portion of income attributable to either (i) sales of goods to foreign persons or (ii) provision of services to foreign persons that exceeds a deemed rate of return on the U.S. company’s tangible depreciable business assets that are related to sales of property to foreign persons or the provision of certain services to any person, or with respect to any property, that is located outside of the United States. The deduction is generally available for income that is derived from a domestic corporation’s (i) sales of goods or provision of services to unrelated foreign persons and (ii) sales of goods or provision of services to related foreign persons, provided that such property is either resold or used in the sale of other property to an unrelated foreign person or, in the case of services, the related party does not provide substantially similar services to persons located in the United States. For taxable years 2018 through 2025, the deduction is equal to 37.5 percent of FDII (reduced to 21.875 percent in 2026). At the new 21 percent corporate income tax rate, this results in an effective U.S. federal income tax rate of 13.125 percent (increased to 16.41 percent in 2026) on FDII. 

A domestic investment advisor may qualify for the FDII deduction where it provides investment management services to a foreign investment fund that is not a related person. In the case of many managers, they may have branded offshore funds to which they provide investment management services. These funds will need to be closely scrutinized to determine whether they are related persons with respect to the investment advisor. For example, if an investment advisor retains the right to appoint the board of directors of a foreign company that is an investment fund, that company may constitute a related party with respect to the investment advisor. Different rules apply to corporations and partnerships in determining whether they are related persons. 

The FDII provisions became effective for taxable years beginning January 1, 2018. 

* * * 
In light of the Act’s significant ambiguities and uncertain application to a variety of industries and situations, the precise impact of the Act remains to be seen and likely will require interpretive guidance from the Internal Revenue Service. Congress may also consider corrections legislation to address issues that arise as implementation moves forward. 

Copyright 2020 K & L GatesNational Law Review, Volume VIII, Number 101


About this Author

Charles Purcell, KL Gates Law Firm, Tax Attorney

Charles Purcell works extensively in the alternative investments areas with a focus on federal and international tax issues.  He has broad experience in the formation of domestic and foreign investment funds including private equity, venture, real estate and infrastructure funds and fund-of-funds; large joint venture transactions; mergers and acquisitions; financing and banking transactions; ventures capital investments and start-up companies; and compensation of managers, executives and promoters.  Mr. Purcell represents numerous domestic and foreign institutional...

Adam Tejeda, KL Gates Law Firm, New York, Tax Law Attorney

Mr. Tejeda counsels clients on a wide range of tax matters associated with domestic and international business transactions. He focuses his practice primarily on tax planning in connection with inbound and outbound investments; cross-border financings; domestic and cross-border mergers and acquisitions; multinational IP planning; advising US based clients with regards to Subpart F; corporate and tax aspects of joint ventures and other partnership issues; hedge fund and private equity fund structures; tax planning with respect to the tax consequences of overseas operations of U.S. multi-nationals; and internal reorganizations. In addition, Mr. Tejeda has represented clients on contested matters with the Internal Revenue Service and similar state taxing authorities, as well as advising clients on Opportunity Zones (OZs) developments established by Congress in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

Frank Dworak, KLGates, Tax

Mr. Dworak is a partner in the firm’s Orange County office. His experience includes representation of clients in connection with transactional tax matters, including with respect to partnerships, mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, insolvency, compensation and other matters; domestic and international tax planning (both inbound and outbound); and complex tax controversy matters before the Internal Revenue Service and the Tax Court. Mr. Dworak also has experience negotiating and obtaining pre-filing agreements and private letter rulings from the IRS.

Elizabeth Crouse Tax Lawyer K&L Gates Law Firm

Elizabeth Crouse is a partner in the tax group of the Seattle office. She provides business-focused solutions for U.S. federal, state, and international tax matters pertinent to mergers and acquisitions, corporate divestitures, internal reorganizations, cross-border transactions, private equity and venture capital fund creation and investments, and start-up companies.

Ms. Crouse is also experienced with U.S. federal and state alternative energy tax incentive programs (including the investment tax credit, production tax credit, and 1603 cash...


Rachel Trickett is an associate in the firm’s Seattle office.  She works on Tax Matters.