March 25, 2018

March 23, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

March 22, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Taxpayers Bear Risk of State’s Proposals to Counter Elimination of SALT Deduction

Several states are considering proposals in an attempt to reduce the impact of federal tax reform’s $10,000 limit on state and local tax (SALT) deductions. In New York, the Governor’s budget proposal includes establishing two charitable organizations (one for health care and one for education) that will enable taxpayers to make a contribution to those funds and receive a credit for 85 percent of the amount donated to offset SALT liabilities. California’s SB 227 similarly creates a charitable organization (California Excellence Fund) and provides a credit against the California income tax for contributions made. Oregon has a similar proposal pending and New Jersey’s Governor indicated that his state is looking into such a plan as well. All of these proposals would give taxpayers the opportunity to make the charitable contribution and get a federal tax deduction and reduce their SALT liability which would be subject to the $10,000 limitation.

These attempts to ‘work around’ the new federal limitation are based upon an IRS chief counsel advice memorandum (CCA 201105010). This memorandum allows a charitable deduction for donations to a state agency or a charitable organization as a deductible charitable contribution, notwithstanding that a tax credit is provided and the amount of the tax credit will not reduce the charitable contribution. Of course, this guidance was given at a time when the law allowed for deductions for both charitable contributions and SALT. It is not clear if the IRS will withdraw that advice, issue guidance to address these proposals, or seek legislation to shut them down.

A taxpayer taking advantage of such a program would file their federal tax return and take a deduction for the charitable contribution and then be able to reduce their state taxes owed and possibly have their total state and local taxes reduced to $10,000 or at least minimize the excess over that amount. If the IRS were to challenge the legitimacy of the charitable contribution, the taxpayer would have to fight that disallowance or lose the benefit of that deduction—the states would bear none of the risk of disallowance.

Tax experts have differing opinions as to whether these ideas will survive IRS scrutiny, any subsequent guidance or legislative fix. There are some that believe that providing less than a credit of 100 percent of the contribution may make the proposal more defendable (hence, NY’s 85 percent credit). Others are quite sure the IRS and Congress will react quickly to preserve the federal revenue associated with the limitation of the SALT deduction.

In any event, if these proposals are enacted by the states, it is the taxpayers who will have to decide whether to risk an audit and disallowance of the charitable contribution or take the hit on the SALT limitation on deductions. For some, the prospect of an audit will deter them from opting to make the charitable donation. For others, the threat of an audit or disallowance is still better than just taking the reduced SALT deduction.

Taxpayers need to consult with their tax advisors before making decisions with regard to these proposals if they are enacted. Taxpayers may wish to wait until the very end of 2018 to see if the IRS provides additional guidance on this matter.

©2018 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.


About this Author


Glenn Newman focuses his practice on tax planning and controversy matters involving state and local taxes including personal income tax, corporate tax, sales tax and real property transfer taxes.He has held several government-positions in New York City throughout his illustrious career. He was most recently named to serve by the City Council as the President of the NYC Tax Commission. 

Prior to working in the finance department, Glenn Newman was the department's head of the Tax and Bankruptcy Division, in the Office of the Corporation Counsel of...

Bradley Marsh, Tax Controversy Attorney, Greenberg Traurig, business license legal counsel, estate tax lawyer, legislative solutions law

Bradley R. Marsh focuses his practice on tax controversy matters, including payroll, property, business license, employment, franchise, parcel, district, sales, documentary transfer, transient occupancy, utility user, income, parking, gift and estate taxes. Brad is experienced representing clients in audits, litigation and administrative hearings, as well as analyzing transactions and business models, and providing legislative solutions.

Areas of Concentration

  • State and local tax

  • Real estate purchase and sale

  • Government relations

  • Tax transactional

Marvin Kirsner, Greenberg Traurig, internet tax legal counsel, bankruptcy representation, transactional lawyer, corporate relocation attorney, entertainment industry law
Boca Raton Administrative Shareholder

Marvin A. Kirsner's primary areas of practice deal with corporate, transactional and industry specific tax issues.

Areas of Concentration

  • Internet tax and electronic commerce tax issues

  • Multistate tax issues

  • Federal, state and local tax controversies

  • Federal and state tax planning for business transactions, mergers, acquisitions and divestitures

  • Telecommunication...


William H. Gorrod focuses his practice on state and local tax issues, and advises clients on controversy, planning, and compliance matters on a multistate basis. His emphasis is on state and local income and franchise taxes, bank taxes, gross receipts taxes, unincorporated business taxes, sales and use taxes, real estate transfer taxes, and payroll taxes. 


  • State and local tax
  • Tax compliance advice
  • Civil tax disputes, including audits, appeals...